Nathan wrote: Thu May 16, 2019 2:05 pm It's just a new growing internet trend of being sanctimonious

Nathan wrote: Thu May 16, 2019 2:05 pm It's just a new growing internet trend of being sanctimonious
Yeah. Wrong people.
Unless you're fortunate enough to live near decent, empty roads then I'd wager most prefer an auto. For shlepping through traffic to work, for going to the shops, for taking stuff to the tip. Can't think of any time nowadays I drive for 'fun' so auto all the time IMO.
That’s your choice though, I and many others still drive for fun as you find a nice route home, get up early or just play being a wally at a load of local roundabouts.Simon wrote: Thu May 16, 2019 6:41 pmUnless you're fortunate enough to live near decent, empty roads then I'd wager most prefer an auto. For shlepping through traffic to work, for going to the shops, for taking stuff to the tip. Can't think of any time nowadays I drive for 'fun' so auto all the time IMO.
Their criticism is based entirely on subjectivity, regarding the tie-up with BMW. Dislike it because you’ve driven it and it’s no good, that’s acceptable. Hate based on the inevitable compromise in this day and age is just a load of band waggoning.integrale_evo wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 11:08 pmAh, I forgot, no one must ever criticise anything they can't afford.ShockDiamonds wrote: Wed May 15, 2019 12:20 pm Company attempts to satisfy a dwindling market segment by pairing up with another major OEM and produce something inevitably compromised when compared to their back catalogue. Then gets slammed by people many of whom could never afford the £50k asking anyway.
I agree with you on that.
One won races, one starred in a series of comedy films. Definitely competitors.JLv3.0 wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 9:32 am Yep that's valid, but we are all quite good at cars, and can get a rough idea of performance from the numbers they produce. I stand by my initial source of disappointment - possibly just for nostalgic reasons but the Supra should go up against the GTR and it just doesn't.
i’m with you on this one, I’m poking fun at myself as much as anyone!JLv3.0 wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 9:32 am Yep that's valid, but we are all quite good at cars, and can get a rough idea of performance from the numbers they produce. I stand by my initial source of disappointment - possibly just for nostalgic reasons but the Supra should go up against the GTR and it just doesn't.
THIS is part of the problem, numbers being worth more than a driving experience. More power means: more weight devoted to cooling, to braking, the increased loads on everything and the vicious circle just continues until the compromises required to deliver "enough" power kills everything pleasurable about driving on the road.Orange Cola wrote: Sun May 19, 2019 1:56 pm I guess the ‘magic’ figure for me would be at or over 400bhp for that money, with performance models going 450bhp+. You can get 3.0L diesels producing around the same horsepower as the Supra and that just feels a bit naff![]()