Musky Poll

Is there any impact of Musk's activities on his main consumer brand:

1. I don't own a Tesla, but his antics would not have any impact on my decision if I wanted to buy one
1
3%
2. I don't own a Tesla. His antics put me off a bit, but I'd probably still purchase one if I wanted to.
2
6%
3. I don't own a Tesla, and his antics would (currently at least - no pun intended) absolutely prevent me from purchasing one.
27
87%
4. I own a Tesla, but his antics would not have any impact on my decision to get another one.
0
No votes
5. I own a Tesla. His antics have put me off the brand a little, but I like the products - would probably purchase another
1
3%
6. I own a Tesla, but due to his antics I would not (currently at least - pun now intended) buy another.
0
No votes
7. I own a Tesla, won't buy another and will possibly replace my current car earlier than I had planned
0
No votes
8. I own a Tesla, won't buy another, and will definitely get rid of my existing car earlier than planned.
0
No votes
9. Heck I quite like the guy. I gonna buy moh Tesla.
0
No votes
10. Sorry, I wanted to add a button to select an argument, but I'm afraid I've ran out of options.
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 31

User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11517
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: Musky Poll

Post by Rich B »

Sounds like it’ll be a ball!
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14649
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Musky Poll

Post by mik »

With that salary you'll get some relief every pay-day.

(Also as someone who works in private industry - WTAF?? A Civil Service Pension with an employer contribution of 28.97% :shock: )
User avatar
JonMad
Posts: 2993
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:25 pm
Currently Driving: 2015 Swift; 2012 Yeti

Re: Musky Poll

Post by JonMad »

Yeah, salary probably justified there. Oh for such a pension (defined benefit, as well, not defined contribution. sad times)
Left over crest; tightens.
User avatar
Explosive Newt
Posts: 1904
Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm

Re: Musky Poll

Post by Explosive Newt »

I think I'm the only Tesla owner to have voted!

It's a challenge. I originally didn't want to buy a Tesla because of Elon Musk back in 2022 but I thought I would give it a fair chance. Compared to the Polestar (heavy, flabby), VW i3 (shopping cart like), BMW whatever it was - the Tesla was best in terms of ride and handling, tech (self driving etc), driving position and of course the charging infrastructure. I think even now when there are credible rivals in terms of handling and tech, I would still worry about losing the charging infrastructure.

The buying experience was a bit cheap but the aftersales has been fine (only issue a cracked wheel).

I think I would need to do my homework before I buy one again. And I may well be in a different financial position when the PCP runs out in 18 months. But without seeing better fast charging infrastructure I would probably stick with Tesla or go back to ICE.

And that is painful to say. It's a good product and I'm sure Tesla employees hate him too.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12129
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Musky Poll

Post by Jobbo »

mik wrote: Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:42 am (Also as someone who works in private industry - WTAF?? A Civil Service Pension with an employer contribution of 28.97% :shock: )
Further down the figure is set out:
Benefits
Alongside your salary of £290,000, Ministry of Defence contributes £84,013 towards you being a member of the Civil Service Defined Benefit Pension scheme.


Remind me what the cap on pension contributions is before incurring tax? Oh yes, £60k. So in practice private sector employees are capped at £60k per annum contributions. A contribution of £84,013 is generous but stupid because the NAD will be taxed on £24,013 of it at 45%, unless there's some concession I'm not aware of for the civil service scheme, or perhaps DB schemes are different? I've never needed to look at them because they were practically all gone by the time I started work in the 1990s.
User avatar
Jimmy Choo
Posts: 2319
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:43 am

Re: Musky Poll

Post by Jimmy Choo »

Sundayjumper wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 10:52 pm It’s unique of course. We have only one NAD.
It's not that unique. I was at school with a guy who had an unfortunate accident that required him to have a NAD removed leaving him with a nickname of Womble.
Banal Vapid Platitudes
Carlos
Posts: 2539
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: Musky Poll

Post by Carlos »

Jobbo wrote: Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:56 am
mik wrote: Thu Mar 20, 2025 9:42 am (Also as someone who works in private industry - WTAF?? A Civil Service Pension with an employer contribution of 28.97% :shock: )
Further down the figure is set out:
Benefits
Alongside your salary of £290,000, Ministry of Defence contributes £84,013 towards you being a member of the Civil Service Defined Benefit Pension scheme.


Remind me what the cap on pension contributions is before incurring tax? Oh yes, £60k. So in practice private sector employees are capped at £60k per annum contributions. A contribution of £84,013 is generous but stupid because the NAD will be taxed on £24,013 of it at 45%, unless there's some concession I'm not aware of for the civil service scheme, or perhaps DB schemes are different? I've never needed to look at them because they were practically all gone by the time I started work in the 1990s.
Its different for DB schemes, the contribution in £s isn't a factor in the calculation. The annual contribution is calculated as 16x the pension accrued in that year, so if you accrued £4,000 per year worth of pension from a age 65 in that year the annual allowance contribution would deemed to be 16x4000=£64,000.

Even using some carry forward allowance from unused previous years though would result in a tax charge quite quickly!
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 5447
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: Musky Poll

Post by integrale_evo »

Sundayjumper wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 12:47 pm True story - ahead of the Model 3 launch, when they were taking pre-orders, I put down a deposit. Closer to launch they removed silver as a colour option and I removed my deposit. No regrets. Even before the current lunacy they were depreciating pretty hard and I felt I'd dodged a bullet.

Last year I bought a s/h i3 when I absolutely could have bought a s/h Model 3. Also no regrets.
Saw a silver Model S today, first silver Tesla I’ve ever seen I think. Always thought it strange that the colour options were so limited, even if you’d have to pay a lot more for one bit from the standard range.
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14649
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Musky Poll

Post by mik »

integrale_evo wrote: Thu Mar 20, 2025 5:41 pm

Saw a silver Model S today, first silver Tesla I’ve ever seen I think.
Silver seems pretty popular on the CiderTrump mind.
V8Granite
Posts: 5395
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:57 am

Re: Musky Poll

Post by V8Granite »

Jimmy Choo wrote: Thu Mar 20, 2025 2:11 pm
Sundayjumper wrote: Wed Mar 19, 2025 10:52 pm It’s unique of course. We have only one NAD.
It's not that unique. I was at school with a guy who had an unfortunate accident that required him to have a NAD removed leaving him with a nickname of Womble.
A lad with an undecended testicle was called Singular as he wasn’t Plural.

Dave!
User avatar
240PP
Posts: 1876
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:27 am
Currently Driving: A5 3.0 TDI, 987 S.

Re: Musky Poll

Post by 240PP »

I saw a BRG Model 3 a couple of days ago. I assume it was a wrap, strange choice if it was.
Post Reply