Your fleet running reports

User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11483
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Rich B »

Sundayjumper wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 3:58 pm
Sundayjumper wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 1:19 pm
Beany wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 12:37 pm One assumes you're planning on using the Ferrari in more inappropriate manners, like doing a small tip run in a tattered hoodie and jeans?
Not quite, but I was genuinely planning a trip to the bottle bank in camo trousers & a NIN t-shirt :lol: I'll do it this afternoon.

IMG_1288.jpeg



IMG_1290.jpeg
https://aldousvoice.com/2012/08/23/ferr ... nge-grill/

😀
User avatar
Sundayjumper
Posts: 8076
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:04 pm
Currently Driving: Peugeot 406 replica, jaaaag, beetle, tractor

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Sundayjumper »


Yes, they do look nice but when he says:
aldousvoice.com wrote:However, these days www.prosport-ferrari.com make pattern grills for a fraction of the OEM price.

Remember that "a fraction" of a very large number is still a pretty large number :lol:
prosport-ferrari.com wrote:65919700 360 CHALLENGE GRILL (AFTERMARKET) (PRANCING HORSE NOT INCLUDED)
Availability: IN STOCK

Excl. Tax: £950.00
Incl. Tax: £1,140.00

It's a low priority right now !
Carlos
Posts: 2528
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Carlos »

GT86 is in lovely condition and still under Toyota Warranty for another 2 years so should be a relatively safe purchase for her.

Image

I'm looking forward to it myself, more than quick enough to have fun. Not sure why I've read that it needs more power!
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5536
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by duncs500 »

@Carlos I like that! 8-) How old is your daughter? I'm assuming late teens early twenties, if so, that's a bloody nice car for her age. Living the dream she is! :)
Carlos
Posts: 2528
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Carlos »

She was 18 in May so a lucky girl.

Another advantage of the earn as you learn route as she's paid for it with a bit of help from me :D
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14562
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by mik »

duncs500 wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 7:57 pm that's a bloody nice car for her age!
That! :shock:

I assume insurance isn’t £whaaat??? As they aren’t that powerful?
User avatar
240PP
Posts: 1864
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:27 am
Currently Driving: A5 3.0 TDI, 987 S.

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by 240PP »

mik wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 8:42 pm
duncs500 wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 7:57 pm that's a bloody nice car for her age!
That! :shock:

I assume insurance isn’t £whaaat??? As they aren’t that powerful?
I’m assuming it very much is £whaaat?!?!1 for an 18 year old.. happy to be pleasantly surprised though!
Carlos
Posts: 2528
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Carlos »

£2800 which I think is ridiculous but she seems to think is ok!

200hp and 1250kg. I drove it 20 miles today on the test drive and enjoyed it, it's not powerful enough to make it snappy though.

You'd have to try to get it moving on tidy tyres which it has and I've told her the car knows if you've turned the tc off if she crashes so hopefully that will buy some time for experience and tuition which she wants to do.

There's also a halfway house tc which allows some slip like the M button on BMW's. Which is also banned!
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5536
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by duncs500 »

Carlos wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 8:27 pm She was 18 in May so a lucky girl.

Another advantage of the earn as you learn route as she's paid for it with a bit of help from me :D
Presume she's a chip off the old block in terms of car interest then? Not an obvious choice for a modern 18 year old I'd say, very cool.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12063
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Jobbo »

Carlos wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 6:33 pm GT86 is in lovely condition and still under Toyota Warranty for another 2 years so should be a relatively safe purchase for her.

Image

I'm looking forward to it myself, more than quick enough to have fun. Not sure why I've read that it needs more power!
Wow - good work you and your daughter!
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12085
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Mito Man »

That's infinitely better than a mito :lol:
How about not having a sig at all?
Shlergen
Posts: 351
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2018 8:22 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Shlergen »

Genuinely liked the 86 I drove circa 5 years ago, went for the Focus ST instead, mainly for practicality reasons.

Felt punchy enough, still want one.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5507
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Carlos wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 6:33 pm GT86 is in lovely condition and still under Toyota Warranty for another 2 years so should be a relatively safe purchase for her.

Image

I'm looking forward to it myself, more than quick enough to have fun. Not sure why I've read that it needs more power!
8-)

I never understood the power comments. It came out when the Clio 197 was still in production I think? And I remember them having incredibly similar PWR and even the same tyre sizes and yet there was rarely such criticism directed at the Clio
Last edited by Swervin_Mervin on Sat Jul 29, 2023 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 8052
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Beany »

I think the sort of people who think it needs more power have never gone above 4500rpm in first and second gear - my mates one zips along very nicely when you test the rev limiter.

Other than wheels, that's near identical to his, too!
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11483
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Rich B »

Beany wrote: Fri Jul 28, 2023 10:37 pm I think the sort of people who think it needs more power have never gone above 4500rpm in first and second gear -
ah yes, the writers at evo fit that description well...

https://www.evo.co.uk/toyota/gt-86/performance

Heck of a car for an 18 year old though! Looks best in white too. 😎
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 8052
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Beany »

Yeah, about that....
Indeed, with the car’s true performance on offer only close to the red line, you need to work the engine hard to extract the flat-four engine’s potential. The commotion will come as a surprise to anyone used to modern four-cylinder turbocharged units
Oh, look basically exactly what I said, and includes the writer admitting that they think it's not as good as a nice, lazy, torquey turbo lump because who wants to rev an NA engine, that sounds like hard work!
It does mean that exploring the car’s limits requires a committed driving style.
Again, sounds rather like what I said.
We’re not saying the GT86 needs another 200bhp, just a broader powerband and another 50bhp and 50lb ft, which would alleviate some frustration and imbue the driving experience with a little more gusto and verve.

Oh daddy, please, please, puw-eaaase put a light pressure turbo on the GT86, I don't like....I don't like having to press the loud pedal too much, it's haaaaaard and it's nooooisy. Please daddy make my life easier. 🥺

Funnily enough chuck 'em the keys to a £200k 911 GT3 and suddenly having to rev an engine out is alright, though.....

There's a reason I don't bother with Evo any more.
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 5131
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by jamcg »

Clio got less criticism because it had a slot in a range, if you wanted faster you got a Megane. Clio was heavily criticised for a lack of torque at the time. Renaultsports of that era had to be thrashed too, my twingo is nippy at low revs but you’ve got to bang it up to the gear change light at 7000rpm if you want to go quick
User avatar
240PP
Posts: 1864
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:27 am
Currently Driving: A5 3.0 TDI, 987 S.

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by 240PP »

Beany wrote: Sat Jul 29, 2023 12:29 am Yeah, about that....
Indeed, with the car’s true performance on offer only close to the red line, you need to work the engine hard to extract the flat-four engine’s potential. The commotion will come as a surprise to anyone used to modern four-cylinder turbocharged units
Oh, look basically exactly what I said, and includes the writer admitting that they think it's not as good as a nice, lazy, torquey turbo lump because who wants to rev an NA engine, that sounds like hard work!
It does mean that exploring the car’s limits requires a committed driving style.
Again, sounds rather like what I said.
We’re not saying the GT86 needs another 200bhp, just a broader powerband and another 50bhp and 50lb ft, which would alleviate some frustration and imbue the driving experience with a little more gusto and verve.
Image
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12063
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Jobbo »

I was going to post the same thing 😂
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11483
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: Your fleet running reports

Post by Rich B »

Beany wrote: Sat Jul 29, 2023 12:29 am Yeah, about that....
Indeed, with the car’s true performance on offer only close to the red line, you need to work the engine hard to extract the flat-four engine’s potential. The commotion will come as a surprise to anyone used to modern four-cylinder turbocharged units
Oh, look basically exactly what I said, and includes the writer admitting that they think it's not as good as a nice, lazy, torquey turbo lump because who wants to rev an NA engine, that sounds like hard work!
It does mean that exploring the car’s limits requires a committed driving style.
Again, sounds rather like what I said.
We’re not saying the GT86 needs another 200bhp, just a broader powerband and another 50bhp and 50lb ft, which would alleviate some frustration and imbue the driving experience with a little more gusto and verve.

Oh daddy, please, please, puw-eaaase put a light pressure turbo on the GT86, I don't like....I don't like having to press the loud pedal too much, it's haaaaaard and it's nooooisy. Please daddy make my life easier. 🥺

Funnily enough chuck 'em the keys to a £200k 911 GT3 and suddenly having to rev an engine out is alright, though.....

There's a reason I don't bother with Evo any more.
Concepts like power delivery, engine character and torque are difficult things to understand and explain. You just need to drive more cars yourself to understand why some engines characters match the car and some don't.

Then there's the fact that some cars simply need more because the chassis is so competent. The R53 Mini Cooper S was a prime example of this. In standard tune it was about the same speed 0-60 as the GT86, and when I test drove one it felt a bit dull because the chassis could easily cope with more. Hence pretty much everyone who had one (who was interested in driving) tuned them with another 40-50bhp and reduced the 0-60 from a dull mid 7s to a more fun low 6s.
Post Reply