A 2.9l V8 putting out 650hp meant it would do just under 230mph.





I kinda see your point - the arches are more pumped, and the wheels (rears at least) look wider, but the 288 wheels fill the arches far more convincingly.Gavster wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 7:51 am I like 90% of it. If you ignore the front 12" then it looks like a 288 with real cojones.
Whereas this would drive me nuts.integrale_evo wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 12:03 pm I’d I had enough money to own my dream car, an f40, I’d probably also have enough money to have a 288 and 288 evo to park beside it.
![]()
I've changed my mind, it's fucking hideous compared to the 288. The front end looks like a Volvo B7TL Plaxton President 66 seater.mik wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 10:05 amI kinda see your point - the arches are more pumped, and the wheels (rears at least) look wider, but the 288 wheels fill the arches far more convincingly.Gavster wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 7:51 am I like 90% of it. If you ignore the front 12" then it looks like a 288 with real cojones.
![]()
LolzGavster wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:58 pm
I've changed my mind, it's fucking hideous compared to the 288. The front end looks like a Volvo B7TL Plaxton President 66 seater.
Twss. (Mind wanders....).Gavster wrote: Wed Oct 26, 2022 5:58 pm Best bet would be to come at it from the back end, with the front against a brick wall. Or drive into and smash the fuck out of it.