Page 1 of 2
Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 4:06 pm
by speedingfine
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 4:28 pm
by speedingfine
Additionally, this parked behind me:
Not my cuppa tbh

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:09 pm
by John
Looks great
I really need to get my finger out and visit this place.
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:34 pm
by Coaster1
Nice pics. What camera did you use?
I’m a fan of Lotus Elan. I think they would work quite well as a weekend car in the congested roads here in the south.
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:07 pm
by speedingfine
Coaster1 wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 5:34 pm
Nice pics.
What camera did you use?
I’m a fan of Lotus Elan. I think they would work quite well as a weekend car in the congested roads here in the south.
I spoke to Dave off here a few years ago as I wanted an SLR around £200 (second hand) and AFAIK he's still the man to go to about cameras. I bought mine with two lenses from MPB Photographic (supplier was also his recommendation). It's a Canon 450D with a EFS 18-55 IS and a EFS 55-250 IS. The latter is just as good as Wookie said and pretty much the only zoom lense I'll ever need.
Hope that helps, but in short speak to Dave!
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 9:34 pm
by Jobbo
Portofino is the California replacement. Nicer, but still very much a tan/gold bracelet Ferrari.
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:15 pm
by speedingfine
Jobbo wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 9:34 pm
Portofino is the California replacement. Nicer, but still very much a tan/gold bracelet Ferrari.
'Base model' but still 592bhp

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:31 pm
by nuttinnew
Nice pics (no.5 reminds me I saw an RV8 a couple of days back), glad you didn't get the rain we had to spoil it

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:33 pm
by Jezh
Jobbo wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 9:34 pm
Portofino is the California replacement. Nicer, but still very much a tan/gold bracelet Ferrari.
Except the photo isn't of a Portofino?

Looks like a Superfast
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:53 pm
by nuttinnew
Jezh wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:33 pm
Jobbo wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 9:34 pm
Portofino is the California replacement. Nicer, but still very much a tan/gold bracelet Ferrari.
Except the photo isn't of a Portofino?

Looks like a Superfast
The one at the back

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 7:34 am
by Jobbo
nuttinnew wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:53 pm
Jezh wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 10:33 pm
Jobbo wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 9:34 pm
Portofino is the California replacement. Nicer, but still very much a tan/gold bracelet Ferrari.
Except the photo isn't of a Portofino?

Looks like a Superfast
The one at the back
Yeah, you can tell because it has Portofino on the number plate

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 9:26 am
by ZedLeg
speedingfine wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 4:28 pm
Additionally, this parked behind me:
Not my cuppa tbh
Ooft, based on an MX-5 apparently. Do you have any pics of the front?

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:16 am
by speedingfine
This one's got the for sale sign on it, £8500 IIRC

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:02 pm
by Coaster1
speedingfine wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:07 pm
I spoke to Dave off here a few years ago as I wanted an SLR around £200 (second hand) and AFAIK he's still the man to go to about cameras. I bought mine with two lenses from MPB Photographic (supplier was also his recommendation). It's a Canon 450D with a EFS 18-55 IS and a EFS 55-250 IS. The latter is just as good as Wookie said and pretty much the only zoom lense I'll ever need.
Hope that helps, but in short speak to Dave!
Thanks. I was sort of hoping you would say ‘phone camera’
My objective is to ditch the DSLR

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:09 pm
by speedingfine
Coaster1 wrote: Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:02 pm
speedingfine wrote: Sun Aug 12, 2018 8:07 pm
I spoke to Dave off here a few years ago as I wanted an SLR around £200 (second hand) and AFAIK he's still the man to go to about cameras. I bought mine with two lenses from MPB Photographic (supplier was also his recommendation). It's a Canon 450D with a EFS 18-55 IS and a EFS 55-250 IS. The latter is just as good as Wookie said and pretty much the only zoom lense I'll ever need.
Hope that helps, but in short speak to Dave!
Thanks. I was sort of hoping you would say ‘phone camera’
My objective is to ditch the DSLR
If you're photographing motorsport (or airshows on occasion in my case) you're always going to need a decent zoom lens and phone cameras are never going to compete

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:10 pm
by ZedLeg
speedingfine wrote: Mon Aug 13, 2018 10:16 am
This one's got the for sale sign on it, £8500 IIRC
It doesn't look as bad from the front, you were clearly trying to make it look worse in that first pic

.
I assume you bought it?
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:14 pm
by JLv3.0
speedingfine wrote: Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:09 pmIf you're photographing motorsport (or airshows on occasion in my case) you're always going to need a decent zoom lens and phone cameras are never going to compete
Yep - not a chance. Phones make tremendous cameras 99% of the time but fall flat on their arse when it comes to zooming.
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 4:29 pm
by Coaster1
Chris / JL,
I agree. But the number of times I took action photos at motorsport events or air shows in the last 5 years...... twice.
Hence a small mirrorless and a decent phone should cover my needs. I could always borrow a DSLR if required.

Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:39 pm
by duncs500
I really want an 812.
Re: Shelsley Walsh yesterday
Posted: Tue Aug 14, 2018 8:06 am
by speedingfine
duncs500 wrote: Mon Aug 13, 2018 6:39 pm
I really want an 812.
It looked awesome tbh, I'm not usually such a fan of modern Ferraris. The wheels in particular looked spot on.