Smart Motorways

Post Reply
User avatar
Zonda_
Posts: 3016
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:35 pm

Smart Motorways

Post by Zonda_ »

User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 5197
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: Smart Motorways

Post by jamcg »

Fucking dumb from the start. It’s like the person who had the idea had never drove on a motorway
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12153
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Smart Motorways

Post by Mito Man »

Yay. Can they bin the gantry cameras too 😂
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10757
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: Smart Motorways

Post by nuttinnew »

I'm sure it'll be the wrong decision and end up costing more, as sure as I am that people will think this means the scrapping of all smart motorways already in existence.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5531
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Smart Motorways

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Good decision. if only they'd bin the existing ones as well.

The cheapest way of saving face would simply be to keep the dynamic speed control and reinstate the hard shoulders. Minimal cost as it's just reinstating a solid line (sort of).
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 5506
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: Smart Motorways

Post by Simon »

Yeah, it's not as simple as that though. Where the M25 clockwise joins the M3 southbound the junction lane joins the M3 where the old hard shoulder was and becomes the left lane. You'd lose a lot of junction space if you reinstated the HS.

I'm sure that's not the only example.
Last edited by Simon on Mon Apr 17, 2023 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12168
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Smart Motorways

Post by Jobbo »

There were always a few places on the motorway network without a hard shoulder before - they were the exception, but it wouldn't be a big leap to retain the merge area without a hard shoulder. Of more interest is how they will then drop a lane when the carriageway reverts to having a hard shoulder.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5531
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Smart Motorways

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Simon wrote: Mon Apr 17, 2023 8:13 am Yeah, it's not as simple as that though. Where the M25 clockwise joins the M3 southbound the junction lane joins the M3 where the hold hard shoulder was and becomes the left lane. You'd lose a lot of junction space if you reinstated the HS.

I'm sure that's not the only example.
It would just merge in further on. You'd just have a relatively short section without hard shoulder.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12168
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Smart Motorways

Post by Jobbo »

Really good article here about the future of Smart Motorways: https://www.roads.org.uk/blog/not-so-smart

TLDR version: the cancellation of Smart Motorways only relates to future projects. Existing Smart Motorways are not going to be re-lined to have a hard shoulder again. The best we can hope for, it appears, is more CCTV, more Stopped Vehicle Detection and more refuge lay-bys to be installed on them.

I learnt something else from the article; it appears the vague 'Report of Obstruction' messages on the smart signs are automatically triggered by Stopped Vehicle Detection. Since they're so undescriptive, I assumed they were manually triggered after someone calls in an object which is in a live lane; I think 'Report of Stopped Vehicle' or similar would be far more useful.
Post Reply