S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12148
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Mito Man »

Image
Erm, where’s the radiator and where is that exhaust manifold going :lol: Never seen under the bonnet of a Griffith before.

The S2000 looks so fresh it could still be sold as a new car today if they just add some garish DRLs to it.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Sundayjumper
Posts: 8076
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:04 pm
Currently Driving: Peugeot 406 replica, jaaaag, beetle, tractor

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Sundayjumper »

Cat - if fitted - is in the chunky pipe front centre and then it loops back under the engine and towards the rear. Chimp is the same.

82191B20-BD66-4DFB-999A-DDFB0E7AF9F6.jpeg
82191B20-BD66-4DFB-999A-DDFB0E7AF9F6.jpeg (68.25 KiB) Viewed 1168 times
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12148
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Mito Man »

Interesting, I guess being front mid engine there’s no place else for it to go. Off to check out other front mid engine cars to see how they’re done.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Jimexpl
Posts: 645
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:30 pm
Contact:

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Jimexpl »

Mito Man wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 2:03 pm Interesting, I guess being front mid engine there’s no place else for it to go. Off to check out other front mid engine cars to see how they’re done.
I don’t think many do it like TVR. You have to remember that the chassis is a central spine, using the driver and passenger as side impact protection! There’s no space to collect the 8 pipes as the transmission tunnel would become too large.
Transaxle cars like Corvettes avoid this because the gearbox is out the back, freeing up space in the middle.

I’m sure TVR logic also did it to ensure that you’d burn yourself if working on a slightly warm engine, and to make sure that the radiator gets nice and toasty when in heavy traffic…
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 5449
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by integrale_evo »

Pipes going the normal route are a pain to thread the steering column through too. Doing it the tvr way means it’s nowhere near and you can thread the pipe the opposite side to the column.
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14664
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by mik »

Now I like an S2000 as much as the next car geek :ugeek: . But. That’s not really a contest, is it? :D

The curving simplicity of the Griff design, on 17’s? <chef’s kiss>.

And whilst those fanny-moulds may indeed look rather silly, they allow the Griff to play one of the sweetest multi-toned tunes ever written for a 4-wheeled plaything, hence they are forgiven.

Want. 8-)
speedingfine
Posts: 2562
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:05 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by speedingfine »

mik wrote: Fri Apr 15, 2022 7:23 pm Now I like an S2000 as much as the next car geek :ugeek: . But. That’s not really a contest, is it? :D

The curving simplicity of the Griff design, on 17’s? <chef’s kiss>.

And whilst those fanny-moulds may indeed look rather silly, they allow the Griff to play one of the sweetest multi-toned tunes ever written for a 4-wheeled plaything, hence they are forgiven.

Want. 8-)
MIC
User avatar
Sundayjumper
Posts: 8076
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:04 pm
Currently Driving: Peugeot 406 replica, jaaaag, beetle, tractor

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Sundayjumper »

The sound of a pre-cat Griff is aural ecstasy.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12149
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Jobbo »

I wondered when I saw this comparison linked whether the S2000 would spring a surprise. Shame it can’t. The Griffith is a car that made me lose 45 minutes (and my girlfriend, who walked off) 30 years ago when I saw one parked in Oxford. But I’d never buy one; even when new, one of my stepfather’s friends had one and returned it after a few months because it just didn’t work. As a classic I guess you expect a bit of involvement in ongoing maintenance but I can imagine that, for me, the amount of that would take the shine off the driving and noise.
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5551
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by duncs500 »

I have been in love with the Griff since they came out, but when it's come to making decisions with real money, much like Jobbo I end up worrying too much about the ownership proposition. I'm sure most of them have had their glitches ironed out by now in truth, but still reckon you need more spannering skillz than I have to make them viable.
User avatar
Sundayjumper
Posts: 8076
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:04 pm
Currently Driving: Peugeot 406 replica, jaaaag, beetle, tractor

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Sundayjumper »

My Dad had a Chimaera for quite a long time and apart from the annual service at a specialist being quite expensive (this was late nineties / early noughties when the car was still relatively new, maybe there's better options now) it gave very few problems. The only time he got stranded was when the alarm / immobiliser crapped itself and refused to let the engine start.

I had one for a while too and although it never gave me any problems I never totally trusted it and that tainted my enjoyment. And buying a TVR after a string of BMWs I found the build quality quite shocking :lol:

That said, they're not complicated cars. No reason at all why you can't spanner them yourself.

Jobbo & Duncs - just do it. YOLO etc.
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5551
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by duncs500 »

Sadly only one garage spot, and I'm very happy with the Elise, but maybe one day.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12149
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Jobbo »

I’d have an Elise, Alpine or even an ND MX5 in 184bhp form. Any of which I’d trust to work on the rare occasions I’d get to drive them.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14664
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by mik »

duncs500 wrote: Sat Apr 16, 2022 8:42 am I have been in love with the Griff since they came out.
Snap.

Sitting beside one for about 15mins in 5-10mph M8 rush-hour traffic when they were a current model didn’t help. All windows down in my diseasel ZX Volcane - the glorious rumble was drowned out only by my beating heart. ;)

It would need to be a 3rd car though. And since I don’t even have a 2nd car (that is mine) the dream is unlikely to ever become a reality. :cry:
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 993
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by MikeHunt »

Jobbo wrote: Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:09 am I’d have an Elise, Alpine or even an ND MX5 in 184bhp form. Any of which I’d trust to work on the rare occasions I’d get to drive them.
Oi!! :lol:
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14664
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by mik »

User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12149
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Jobbo »

MikeHunt wrote: Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:46 am
Jobbo wrote: Sat Apr 16, 2022 10:09 am I’d have an Elise, Alpine or even an ND MX5 in 184bhp form. Any of which I’d trust to work on the rare occasions I’d get to drive them.
Oi!! :lol:
It’s the one I’m quite seriously considering, in preference to the other two, so I’m not demeaning it!
speedingfine
Posts: 2562
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:05 pm

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by speedingfine »

See my sig for Tiff Needell's preferred choice over a TVR and an S2000 ;)
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12149
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: S2000 Vs Griffith with Bov

Post by Jobbo »

speedingfine wrote: Sat Apr 16, 2022 5:53 pm See my sig for Tiff Needell's preferred choice over a TVR and an S2000 ;)
Yours is probably the only 7 he can fit in 😄
Post Reply