Page 5 of 5
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:29 pm
				by Gavin
				DaveE wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:26 pm
Gavin wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:04 pm
Ascender wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2019 11:54 am
Fucking social media.... People seem to be spamming every platform possible with posts along the lines of "if we can raise 600M for a building in a few days then why can't we put an end to world poverty".
 
And?  Are you a big fan of world poverty?  
It is a fair point, the world in which we live, people die because of no clean water or no food whilst others can reach down the back of the proverbial sofa and spunk 300 MILLION Euros to rebuild a church owned by teh state and leased to one of the richest organisations in the world.
The outpouring of bandwagon grief over an old church from predominantly no religious people is far more galling than wanting to live in a fairer world nes pas?
 
Far more gauling? 
 
 
Puntastic!   

 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:30 pm
				by JLv3.0
				Simon wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:28 pm
JLv3.0 wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2019 12:09 pm
The "story" underneath it is even better!
 
I thought the Mash was supposed to be a satirical site?
 
Like Jonathan Pie, innit - sometimes satire is indistinguishable from reality!
 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 2:23 pm
				by Jobbo
				GG. wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:00 am
tim wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:57 am
No. For one Lloyds of London IS a group of insurers. Lol
 
Well, a corporate body made up of syndicates of underwriters but yes, Richard has probably got the point by now  
 
 
Lloyds of London is a marketplace where insurers transact business but is not itself an insurer.  Richard also seems not to be aware of insurance in layers, nor reinsurance.  I don't suppose this is the time nor place to explain how insurance actually works though.
 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 3:30 pm
				by Richard
				I bow down
			 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 3:46 pm
				by Swervin_Mervin
				Turns out it was Jesus wot did it:
Lesley Rowan, from Alexandria in West Dunbartonshire, believes she can see the silhouette of the son of God in one of the pictures of the blaze taking hold of the cathedral. "When I looked at this photo last night, I was really astounded by what I saw. When I look at it I see a silhouette of Jesus. I really see a vivid image. I shared it and asked for people's opinions - even my brother in Australia said it looks like Jesus. I feel like it will bring comfort to people in Paris and all over the world at this sad time."
 
 
 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:03 pm
				by GG.
				If even the Australians think so then that's good enough for me  
 
 
Do you think these people spend too much time doing those puzzles where you have to de-focus your eyes and now everything is just blurry for them...
 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 4:12 pm
				by Mito Man
				They must spend a lot of time trying to distinguish objects and faces out of clouds as theyâre so fucking bored down there.
			 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 5:10 pm
				by dinny_g
				Itâs amazing what the âfaithfulâ tend to see
The whole of Ireland went doolally over âMoving Statuesâ back in the 80âs
Even the Left Leggers weâre coming down from the North to check it out.
			 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 5:16 pm
				by GG.
				Too much of the blackened ale  

 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 6:42 pm
				by dinny_g
				No comment  

 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:11 pm
				by tim
				I especially liked Gwarred's comment to the ArchBish of Canterbury on his faceyb this morning. Straight to the point! 

 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2019 10:23 pm
				by mik
				tim wrote: Wed Apr 17, 2019 8:11 pm
I especially liked Gwarred's comment to the ArchBish of Canterbury on his faceyb this morning. Straight to the point! 
 
 
 
 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 4:56 am
				by Gwaredd
				I only said 'maybe God did it as punishment for fucking all those kids'
A tad harsh perhaps,  but there's no denying they do/did fuck a lot of kids and got away with it.
			 
			
					
				Re: Notre-Dame
				Posted: Thu Apr 18, 2019 6:13 am
				by unzippy
				I'd like to see donations be spent on contraception.
It will be a lot more beneficial to the world than a new roof and it would piss off the church something terrible 
