Page 219 of 287

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:38 am
by Rich B
duncs500 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:20 am Whilst I'm sure it's open to manipulation, I don't think it's quite so simple. The rules have prescribed different amounts in different pots from the analysis I've seen. So the rules might give you a £2k hookers budget, and a £150 gas bill budget, then your breach would be on the gas bill and not the hookers.
it is pretty simple - don't breach your budget.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:07 pm
by IanF
I think the fine should be split equally between the other teams and not included in their allowed spend for the next season. So then there’s a clear disadvantage to “accidentally“ overspending, as you’re giving the competition more money for the next year.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:33 pm
by DeskJockey
IanF wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 12:07 pm I think the fine should be split equally between the other teams and not included in their allowed spend for the next season. So then there’s a clear disadvantage to “accidentally“ overspending, as you’re giving the competition more money for the next year.
I like it! Do that with the wind tunnel time too.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:41 pm
by jamcg
duncs500 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:21 am If it was just one pot, it would only be pay drivers on the grid, because you could do a lot of aero development with LHs wages!
Driver wages are separate and uncapped to prevent this from occurring or you might find a grid full of strolls latifis and maldonados

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 1:51 pm
by Mito Man
Drivers + 3 highest paid people in each team are excluded from cost cap I think. Red Bull should pay Christian Horner a few million more next year so he can start sub contracting his own personal chefs 😉

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Sun Oct 30, 2022 9:22 pm
by Swervin_Mervin
duncs500 wrote: Sun Oct 30, 2022 11:20 am Whilst I'm sure it's open to manipulation, I don't think it's quite so simple. The rules have prescribed different amounts in different pots from the analysis I've seen. So the rules might give you a £2k hookers budget, and a £150 gas bill budget, then your breach would be on the gas bill and not the hookers.
Would be interesting to know how much that's the case. Ferrari were suggesting there's not much of an impact losing 10% of aero time as what they can't spend on that they can spend what they save on other performance areas.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:13 pm
by Delphi
Horner's getting an absolute (and well-deserved) pasting on Twitter for RB boycotting Sky F1 because Ted Kravitz mentioned a hypothetical movie script where Lewis was robbed of the title. This has backfired on him in a big way. Matthew Syed's piece in The Times is spot on.

It's behind a paywall but here's a copy

Image

http://gallery.ov9.co.uk/images/2022/11/02/image-2.png

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:15 pm
by DeskJockey
Picture doesn't scale well unfortunately.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:57 pm
by Delphi
DeskJockey wrote: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:15 pm Picture doesn't scale well unfortunately.
Updated with a clicky link

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 2:34 pm
by dinny_g

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 2:57 pm
by Rich B
He’s just a whiny little prick isn’t he. Always the victim. Never his fault.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 2:58 pm
by dinny_g
I have no real interest in F1 anymore but even then, I still can't stand him...

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 3:08 pm
by Mito Man
I tried to give him the benefit of the doubt many times, maybe he’s just a puppet and Helmut’s pulling his strings etc. But last week when he started playing the victim and going on about the entirely true allegations causing Red Bull employees mental health issues and playground bullying etc I thought he showed his true colours of being a horrible piece of shit.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 3:09 pm
by Swervin_Mervin
He is a cunt. No other word is more fitting.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 4:19 pm
by dinny_g
Mito Man wrote: Wed Nov 02, 2022 3:08 pmBut last week when he started playing the victim and going on about the entirely true allegations causing Red Bull employees mental health issues and playground bullying etc I thought he showed his true colours of being a horrible piece of shit.
See also Rebecca Vardy…

I mahooosivly betrayed my friends trust for money but the knowledge that I mahooosivly betrayed my friends trust for money is causing me mental health problems so please feel sorry for me…

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 6:27 pm
by duncs500
Delphi wrote: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:13 pm Horner's getting an absolute (and well-deserved) pasting on Twitter for RB boycotting Sky F1 because Ted Kravitz mentioned a hypothetical movie script where Lewis was robbed of the title. This has backfired on him in a big way. Matthew Syed's piece in The Times is spot on.

It's behind a paywall but here's a copy

Image

http://gallery.ov9.co.uk/images/2022/11/02/image-2.png
Bravo.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 8:02 pm
by DeskJockey
duncs500 wrote: Wed Nov 02, 2022 6:27 pm
Delphi wrote: Wed Nov 02, 2022 12:13 pm Horner's getting an absolute (and well-deserved) pasting on Twitter for RB boycotting Sky F1 because Ted Kravitz mentioned a hypothetical movie script where Lewis was robbed of the title. This has backfired on him in a big way. Matthew Syed's piece in The Times is spot on.

It's behind a paywall but here's a copy

Image

http://gallery.ov9.co.uk/images/2022/11/02/image-2.png
Bravo.
With bells on.

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 10:47 pm
by jamcg
I wouldn’t call him a loser. I’d call him an absolute cunt of the highest order

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2022 7:23 pm
by Rich B

Re: No F1 thread?

Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2022 11:57 am
by Gavin
Swervin_Mervin wrote: Wed Nov 02, 2022 3:09 pm He is a cunt. No other word is more fitting.
You have misread that, it said "self serving cant" although possibly a typo...