Re: Today’s want
Posted: Wed Mar 25, 2026 9:03 pm
As money/gold and Jews is a common and long-standing anti-Semitic trope, JRG is offensive for that reason.
Take this with a big dose of “tell me to fuck off” but i sincerely hope we all would be comfortable making similar jokes about all our groups.JonathanE wrote: Wed Mar 25, 2026 5:45 pmJust curious - would you feel as comfortable making similar jokes about other groups?
Jonathan
I can see where you're coming from, and I applaud the sentiment. But it doesn't work. It isn't difficult to explain, but difficult to understand. If you've never been a minority in your own country, taught to always be on your guard, gone to school behind 20 foot barbed wire fences, and half-hourly police drive-bys, confronted daily with people denying your right to exist for no other reason than the faith you grew up in, then I don't think you can appreciate what something like that means.Rich B wrote: Wed Mar 25, 2026 9:37 pmTake this with a big dose of “tell me to fuck off” but i sincerely hope we all would be comfortable making similar jokes about all our groups.JonathanE wrote: Wed Mar 25, 2026 5:45 pmJust curious - would you feel as comfortable making similar jokes about other groups?
Jonathan
If someone wants to make a brits have bad teeth or French surrender a lot or the welsh shag sheep or “ze germans” or anything else, if it’s not meant as a direct threat/attack then i think we’re all fair game. It’s inclusive rather than exclusive imo.
Fair enough, i’m happy to be educated where needed!JonathanE wrote: Wed Mar 25, 2026 9:58 pm Jews are probably better at laughing at themselves than any other group (is that racist?).
But (a) this joke wasn't particularly funny (b) it seems that most people give no thought to whether it might be offensive (which I think it clearly is, for the reason given above) (c) jokes on this forum about any other minority group seem to be rare (although in fairness I do remember something about the Irish, or was it the Scots?) and last but not least (d) nobody is going round at the moment shooting at British/French/German people just because of their nationality, or setting their ambulances on fire etc etc etc.
So take this with a big dose of "tell me I'm too sensitive", but yes, my first instinct is to tell you to fuck off. Sorry!
That looks lovely. Only thing I’d potentially want on top of that spec is the 6-sp, and maybe some different alloys but a second set is always useful.John wrote: Wed Mar 25, 2026 6:49 pm I'm still casually looking at Caterhams as a future purchase. I'm not after bonkers power as it will be a road car so would prefer something I can rev out through the gears occasionally and not be doing licence losing speeds in a few seconds. I'm also looking at newer models so this brings me to the 1.6 Ford Sigma engine which has a maximum power of 152bhp
This one is nice, hardly used and I like metallic white cars. It's just had the price dropped by 2k too
https://caterhamcars.com/en/find-buy/caterham-310s-2
Thank you, apology accepted.speedingfine wrote: Wed Mar 25, 2026 10:57 pm Here's the Pistonheads view from 2012. I have read your posts Jonathan and DJ, and have changed the post. It's a very different climate now. Hopefully you can accept my apologies to you both.
I do however like the term PRB, Pensioner Racing Beige which may be ageist![]()
https://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/top ... 231144&p=1
As an aside, it seems the W123 in question has been sold. At least someone liked it![]()
That looks good value for pretty much an unused car. Is that even run in? If you’re not seeking 200+ bhp that would appear to be an excellent opportunity.John wrote: Wed Mar 25, 2026 6:49 pm I'm still casually looking at Caterhams as a future purchase.
This one is nice, hardly used and I like metallic white cars. It's just had the price dropped by 2k too
Apparently the six speed box has very close ratios with 6th being lower than 5th in the five speed box (that fact surprised me) so is more suited to a car predominantly used for track daysJobbo wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2026 6:15 am That looks lovely. Only thing I’d potentially want on top of that spec is the 6-sp, and maybe some different alloys but a second set is always useful.
I've only driven two Caterhams, both on track and both had the 6-sp. It has a real character because of the quick shift-shift-shift but yes, the top ratio is pretty low so it would be wearing on a longer road journey. Wheels are easy to replace, gearbox less so - I'd definitely get a go in a 6-sp if you can.John wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2026 7:52 amApparently the six speed box has very close ratios with 6th being lower than 5th in the five speed box (that fact surprised me) so is more suited to a car predominantly used for track daysJobbo wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2026 6:15 am That looks lovely. Only thing I’d potentially want on top of that spec is the 6-sp, and maybe some different alloys but a second set is always useful.
I do agree on the wheels and much prefer the look of the 13 inch versions
+1; it's very rare for anyone to change their opinion as a result of online discussions, so I appreciate this.
...Jobbo, RichB and Broccers argue about it ad infinitum.dinny_g wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2026 9:36 am If only the world worked like this place - it's not often we can say that...
Person 1 says something with absolutely no malice intended
Person 2 feels it's inappropriate due to their specific context - which is 100% correct
Person 1 gives a genuine apology as no offense was intended
Person 2 graciously accepts apology and we all move on
Jobbo wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2026 10:13 am...Jobbo, RichB and Broccers argue about it ad infinitum.dinny_g wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2026 9:36 am If only the world worked like this place - it's not often we can say that...
Person 1 says something with absolutely no malice intended
Person 2 feels it's inappropriate due to their specific context - which is 100% correct
Person 1 gives a genuine apology as no offense was intended
Person 2 graciously accepts apology and we all move on
Very much this. And also what @Jobbo said.dinny_g wrote: Thu Mar 26, 2026 9:36 am If only the world worked like this place - it's not often we can say that...
Person 1 says something with absolutely no malice intended
Person 2 feels it's inappropriate due to their specific context - which is 100% correct
Person 1 gives a genuine apology as no offense was intended
Person 2 graciously accepts apology and we all move on