Re: Bye bye Theresa
Posted: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:45 pm
Remind me which way you'd vote?
I don't give a flying fuck about winning you idiots over. You haven't got a logical or intellectual argument to make. It's the same as arguing with anti-vaxxers or flat earthers.GG. wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:41 pmThat's the way to win them over Rev! People's Vote should make you their representativeNotoriousREV wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:30 pmWhat a load of fucking horseshit. what we need is to tell the thick, the racists, and old folk to fuck off.Carlos wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:26 pm
Proposed this week lol
The vote is done, order in implementing Brexit is whats needed now, not whining carpet munching vegans wanting to go back in time .![]()
No it isn't. Which is why he's resignedSimon wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:29 pm What I don't understand is why Raab has resigned. It's what HE negotiated! That's like literally marking AND FAILING your own homework. Ridiculous. Moron!
Exactly.Swervin_Mervin wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:48 pmNo it isn't. Which is why he's resignedSimon wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:29 pm What I don't understand is why Raab has resigned. It's what HE negotiated! That's like literally marking AND FAILING your own homework. Ridiculous. Moron!
I've seen him on Twitter, i'm out
I find it hard to be friendly towards those that have voted to strip me of my rights and make me worse off without even being able to articulate in any solid way what the benefits will actually be and when they'll be delivered. We've been here before and all I got from you last time was "I've explained my reasons previously so I'm not doing it again", which is something I've seen a lot from Brexiters.GG. wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:51 pm Its the spirit of conciliation and friendship he exudes which I really appreciate.
There is time for another referendum, notwithstanding that there isn't a need for one. However, I can see it still happening, ridiculous notion though a second referendum is, to give MPs some justification for voting to stay in the EU.GG. wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 2:13 pm
It isn't really a viable option Carlos, no. It really only works if the following happens:
1) the ECJ case concludes we can unilaterally revoke Article 50, OR the EU27 agree to us doing so; and
2) Parliament votes to have another referendum to determine whether we should revoke Article 50 (to give them the political mandate to do so)... but which they don't have time to arrange before March... OR they decide to revoke without doing so (which even the "People's Vote" proponents aren't advocating).
So, for perhaps the only time in my life I agree with Guy Verhofstadt on that point.
umm...NotoriousREV wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 3:07 pmIn my many, many online arguments, only one person has actually been able to articulate why they voted for remain in a way I could understand their point of view, even though I still disagreed.
As in not using any of the following vacuous and completely meaningless phrases: undemocratic, EUSSR, sovereignty, take back control, will of the people etc.Rich B wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 3:47 pmumm...NotoriousREV wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 3:07 pmIn my many, many online arguments, only one person has actually been able to articulate why they voted for remain in a way I could understand their point of view, even though I still disagreed.
Oh yeah
If only someone had mentioned that a few minutes ago...Mito Man wrote: Thu Nov 15, 2018 3:53 pm Looks like there’s a press conference outside no. 10 at 5pm.