FAO Sunglass Aficionados

User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by JLv3.0 »

This thread reminded me I've got a pair of Oakleys that I never wear as they're boring, so ordered a pair of lenses last night.

When I placed the order I got a 10% discount code - RD34DS - not sure if it's one-time only so get cracking :D
drcarlos
Posts: 1419
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:17 am

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by drcarlos »

I'm 3/4 of the way through having all of my Oakleys re-lensed to my prescription, my oldest A-Wires are still going (had two rubber parts refresh kits) but one of the lenses is cracked now but they are 2001 vintage. I favour the original 5's for sports (have to pick up used ones now as they are long out of production) as they hang on well at speed and shield my eyes from wind.
I have to wear sunglasses a lot as my eyes are sensitive to bright light and i'm always squinting if I don't wear them, the A-wires have been though a lot over the years and aren't badly scratched with only a few light marks but I guess the lenses get brittle over time so they crack when dropped, which happened last year.
The wife has a set of Ray-bans, but even though they are the are the same company now they don't seem as well made as Oakley.

Carl.
User avatar
Gavin
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm
Currently Driving: Audi S5, R56 Cooper S

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by Gavin »

I have Ray Bans, some Serengeti in the bus and some Bloc ones for just walking about etc.

I also have some old Full Metal Jackets in the back of a drawer with broken legs, I think I got as far as finding the returns address to get the re-framed then promptly forgot them!
User avatar
Richard
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by Richard »

Nefarious wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 5:40 pm
JLv3.0 wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:47 pm Dunno mate. I just suck at them. Leave them places, bung them in the washing machine, lose them, break them, and so on. Bit of a pain really!
Too much of a cheapskate these days - I buy fake wayfarers in bulk. At £2.50 a pop, there's only so many fucks I can give when they get lost, run over, or sliced with an angle grinder.
This is actually very dangerous. You want to be *certain* that they’re UVA/B blocking, otherwise all the sunglasses are doing is making your pupils open up nice and wide when it’s bright, allowing the UV to fuck you hard
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11530
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by Rich B »

Richard wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:23 am
Nefarious wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 5:40 pm
JLv3.0 wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 3:47 pm Dunno mate. I just suck at them. Leave them places, bung them in the washing machine, lose them, break them, and so on. Bit of a pain really!
Too much of a cheapskate these days - I buy fake wayfarers in bulk. At £2.50 a pop, there's only so many fucks I can give when they get lost, run over, or sliced with an angle grinder.
This is actually very dangerous. You want to be *certain* that they’re UVA/B blocking, otherwise all the sunglasses are doing is making your pupils open up nice and wide when it’s bright, allowing the UV to fuck you hard
UV protection isn’t an expensive thing to achieve though, so most cheap glasses perform just as well as expensive ones.
User avatar
Richard
Posts: 945
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:03 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by Richard »

Correct

But cheap/counterfeit sunglasses bought on eBay or at a market etc may be being made to the cheapest possible price
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11530
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by Rich B »

Richard wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2019 11:50 am Correct

But cheap/counterfeit sunglasses bought on eBay or at a market etc may be being made to the cheapest possible price
i’d agree for buying them at a market or festival - but eBay sellers are fine.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12149
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by Mito Man »

It's a pretty stupid risk to take though, especially when you can pick up a pair with actual UV protection from £10 at TKMaxx.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11530
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by Rich B »

Mito Man wrote: Tue Apr 16, 2019 12:23 pm It's a pretty stupid risk to take though, especially when you can pick up a pair with actual UV protection from £10 at TKMaxx.
i reckon I’d trust an eBay seller (not an individual person, someone selling loads) over TKMaxx tbh!
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 7925
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by ZedLeg »

Nah, someone dropshipping glasses made in some random Chinese factory is far less likely to know how they’re made than the branded glasses they sell in Tk Maxx.
An absolute unit
User avatar
ste
Posts: 877
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:16 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by ste »

JLv3.0 wrote: Sun Apr 14, 2019 11:17 am Either stock off the 'Bay but I like a bit of homebrew so I feel "special"- check out Fuse lenses - https://www.fuselenses.com/ - they have nicer choices than stock Ray-ban lenses and are not dear at all (I'm guessing you still like your existing frames).
Awesome link, thanks.

I wear Ray-bans mostly but also have a few pairs of Oakley Frogskins. I bought some fake Jokely Frogskins off eBay and the frames were practically identical, the lenses scratched in no time at all though compared to the genuine ones. I had some Oakley Jawbones for cycling and broke them in a crash. I bought a fake pair and the genuine lenses fit straight into them and the actual frames are again pretty indistinguishable. I wouldn't be surprised if they came out of the same flipping factory.

Recently bought some 100% S2s, they're really nice and performance of fit, staying put on your face and clarity etc is fantastic.
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5551
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by duncs500 »

Got my new Fuse lenses, fitted like a glove. 8-)

Having to pay £11 customs duty was a bit annoying (especially since Royal Mail's 'handling fee' was £8 of it). Still, cheaper than new shades and the lenses are good. Good tip JL. :)
User avatar
evostick
Posts: 675
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 8:26 am

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by evostick »

Thanks to this thread I bought some new lenses for some well liked old rayban frames. Fuckers ended up coming all the way from AUS but thankfully I didn't get stung by customs.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by mik »

Some TAUC stole my eldest’s bag last week. :evil: Amongst other items, he lost his Police sunnies.

He’s just therefore inherited my old Oakley TinCans - 10yrs old now but there isn’t a mark on them. 8-) Fit and suit him perfectly.

Have ordered a pair of Serengeti’s for me, so it’s not necessarily the most generous gifting evah. :oops:
User avatar
16vCento
Posts: 1247
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:06 pm
Currently Driving: Golf GTE
Kuga ST Line X PHEV

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by 16vCento »

I bought a pair of Ray-Ban Aviators last month as we found that my wife's Boots Opticians contact lens plan let her have half price on any pair of sunglasses, prescription lens or not, as long as they were for her.

Obviously when she wears her contact lenses, any sunglasses would need to not have a prescription lens.....

75 quid for proper Aviators isn't bad!
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 7925
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by ZedLeg »

I was wearing my old aviators a bit through the summer as they fit under my (bike) helmet better than my oversize wayfarers.

I forgot how much I liked them.
An absolute unit
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by dinny_g »

I've recently bought a cheap pair as my Oakley's are scratched to buggery so this has come in a good time.

Now I have to try to remember what they're called / the model as their a good few years old and the packaging is long gone :lol:
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14667
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by mik »

dinny_g wrote: Fri Sep 13, 2024 9:06 am
Now I have to try to remember what they're called / the model as their a good few years old and the packaging is long gone :lol:
Model number is usually printed on the inside face of a leg
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by dinny_g »

Cool Mik - I'll check.
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5529
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: FAO Sunglass Aficionados

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

I'm still rocking a pair of Maui Jim's I got around 6 years ago or more, and in the wife's car I have my Police sunnies that must be well over 20 years old. I still love those - they're not only the most comfortable but the bronze tint makes even Manchester look like a warm paradise
Post Reply