OV9

Posted: **Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:59 am**

Gavster wrote: Thu Mar 20, 2025 10:08 am I’ve been using it a lot more recently as a blank page filler. E.g. a way to quickly spitball some ideas that I can take away and make my own. I’m working on making my prompts to get better results, but a lot of the outputs are still generic trash to me.

So it's more like a random Lorem Ipsum?

Posted: **Sat Apr 05, 2025 7:57 pm**

I think Porsche need to use ChatGPT to design some cars, this looks fantastic to me

Posted: **Sat Apr 05, 2025 8:09 pm**

That looks good. With a front-mid mounted flat6 and a Manuel box please.

Posted: **Sat Apr 05, 2025 9:59 pm**

"It is scary to see how good the ai is these days"

Fuck off, it took a 944, smoothed some lines, added LED lights, big wheels and GT3 air dams. It also left pop up lights, which are literally illegal everywhere.

It's fucking useless, and people need to stop pretending otherwise.

Posted: **Sun Apr 06, 2025 9:41 am**

As a styling exercise for a modded 944 that looks very cool

Posted: **Sun Apr 06, 2025 9:55 am**

Yeah, hardly a re-imagination. Though an interesting take on what the 944/68 could have become, if Porsche didn't stop making it.

When I visited the Porsche Museum in 2016 for the 40 years of transaxle Porsche exhibition. One of the cars they had on display, was a prototype rear engine 944, AWD from 1981/82. Still 4 cylinder. I think they were prototyping it for racing. Apparently they cancelled the project to "Free up resources for the Group B Study" which must have been the 959.

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2025 9:59 am**

Here’s one of the most frightening AI headlines I’ve seen:

FDA plans to phase out animal testing requirement for drug testing and replace it with “AI-based computational models of toxicity” and organoid toxicity testing

https://bsky.app/profile/bita137.bsky.s ... jniz6ons2i

https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-a ... ther-drugs

They’re going to use AI to guess if stuff is toxic ?

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2025 5:20 pm**

They're going to use AI to determine what's poisonous based on an algorithm that scores sentences based on game logic, and which to this day has difficulty with basic maths.

Posted: **Sat Apr 12, 2025 9:56 pm**

Not saying that drug "testing" by "AI" (how many fucking quotes am I going to need in this sentence) isn't dodgy but last year's noble prize in Chemistry was won by a group using machine learning for protein behaviour prediction.

https://www.sciencealert.com/ingenious- ... -chemistry

So it's not necessarily stupid, but I'll admit increased skepticism about anything happening the US is rightly quite high at the moment.

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2025 8:35 am**

Interesting. That’s proper research of course, rather than a government agency that will be under pressure to generate a certain required answer.

Speaking of starting with the answer you want and fabricating all the evidence to fit, RFK Jr is launching research that will find the true cause of autism, he says the results will be published in September. I’m hoping it turns out it’s not vaccines, not because that’s true and we already known it, but because then he’ll have to come up with something even more insane like carpet or standing one one leg in the shower

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2025 1:43 pm**

RobYob wrote: Sat Apr 12, 2025 9:56 pm Not saying that drug "testing" by "AI" (how many fucking quotes am I going to need in this sentence) isn't dodgy but last year's noble prize in Chemistry was won by a group using machine learning for protein behaviour prediction.

https://www.sciencealert.com/ingenious- ... -chemistry

So it's not necessarily stupid, but I'll admit increased skepticism about anything happening the US is rightly quite high at the moment.

Machine learning to spot differences, similarities etc and speed up things via inference etc is absolutely valid.

But I have mental images of them just sending PDFs of research papers into ChatGPT and asking which is best, because, as you note, look at the absolute fucking state of the US at the moment.

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2025 2:19 pm**

Sundayjumper wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 8:35 am Interesting. That’s proper research of course, rather than a government agency that will be under pressure to generate a certain required answer.

Speaking of starting with the answer you want and fabricating all the evidence to fit, RFK Jr is launching research that will find the true cause of autism, he says the results will be published in September. I’m hoping it turns out it’s not vaccines, not because that’s true and we already known it, but because then he’ll have to come up with something even more insane like carpet or standing one one leg in the shower

Reminds me of this:

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2025 10:47 pm**

Sundayjumper wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 8:35 am Speaking of starting with the answer you want and fabricating all the evidence to fit, RFK Jr is launching research that will find the true cause of autism, he says the results will be published in September. I’m hoping it turns out it’s not vaccines, not because that’s true and we already known it, but because then he’ll have to come up with something even more insane like carpet or standing one one leg in the shower

As they've run out of ideas from 1984 and moved onto The Handmaid's Tale I'll take a bet on them finding strong correlation between female literacy and autism...

Posted: **Sun Apr 13, 2025 11:07 pm**

I subscribe to the New Scientist magazine - ai has theoretically come up with several thousand new materials and we have now created 20-30 from that list irl.. it’s not perfect but highly repetitive simulations with slight variations can be effective, and our current ai are perfect for these calculations

Posted: **Mon Apr 14, 2025 6:26 am**

Ian, is that AI or is that term being used to describe computer modelling?

Posted: **Mon Apr 14, 2025 6:41 am**

Yes, Ai does seem to be the current buzz word to describe the sort of things computers have been doing for decades under other terms.

Funny how the mining of fake coins and the utter waste of resources massively accelerated the compute power / Watt of electricity ratio and is now making them more useful for real world things than ever.

Posted: **Mon Apr 14, 2025 7:23 am**

This is the scary bit of ai, the sheer amount of power it needs is unreal, and so much of it is useless requests, like the current trend of make me look like a kids toy so I don’t miss out on my 25 followers thinking I’m cool

Posted: **Mon Apr 14, 2025 7:58 am**

IanF wrote: Sun Apr 13, 2025 11:07 pm ...highly repetitive simulations with slight variations…

That sounds like Monte Carlo simulation.

Posted: **Mon Apr 14, 2025 1:26 pm**

jamcg wrote: Mon Apr 14, 2025 7:23 am This is the scary bit of ai, the sheer amount of power it needs is unreal, and so much of it is useless requests, like the current trend of make me look like a kids toy so I don’t miss out on my 25 followers thinking I’m cool

It is a lot, but in comparison to heavy industry it's still small

One tonne of aluminium takes 14,000kWh to produce and global production is estimated to be seventy million tonnes a year.

Let's call it a Terawatthour globally. I wonder how much energy producing the silicon to run chatgpt consumed.

Not that I can do without my vibecoding assistant any more than I can do without a Ghiblified version of my cat .

Sauces
https://www.statista.com/statistics/111 ... intensity/

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of ... production

Posted: **Mon Apr 14, 2025 6:45 pm**

Yeah, but a tonne of aluminium is actually useful.

OV9

ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT

Re: ChatGPT