mik wrote: Sat Jan 11, 2020 12:42 am
Why do they seem to attack/ rip the piss out of women? What is funny about that? Why is there no macho-lesbian equivalent? We've just watched an episode of Ru Paul's DR and i had to keep forcing my shoulders back down. Nothing do with the sexuality of the contestants - just due to cringing at the fact they came across as unsufferable wonkers.
Isn't the history of drag based in misogyny?
Once upon a time, all actors were male. "Serious" female parts were performed with a genuine attempt to impersonate, but comedy parts were caricatures, deriving a significant part of their "comedy" by mocking female attributes. The echo/hangover from this is the pantomime dame.
In the US, the 20th century, drag was born as a side show to the black-up performers - the audience took a breather from taking the piss out of black men, to additionally take the piss out of black women.
In the UK, drag, as we know it today, grew out of cabaret performances in underground 50s and 60s gay clubs - men only and deeply misogynistic.
Interestingly, my experience (based on my small sample of my male gay mates) is that drag and transvestism are seen completely differently in the gay community, even when the ostentatious end of transvestism starts to blur into drag. Especially among more misogynistic gay men - love drag, but reserve a special hatred for trannies.