He can detail my car anytime

Last paragraph is my concern aswell.integrale_evo wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:35 pmWhile it might not matter for most owners, or the terms of the lease, it doesn't bode well for the long term appearance and just confirms many people's thoughts that they're designed to be disposable motoring. Which if turns out to be true isn't great for the 'green' credentials they try to sell them on.Mr Pish wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2019 9:48 pmThere does seam to be some inconstancy with Tesla paint, from my perspective, it’s a tool and it’s going to get abused by other people (car park dings etc) so as long as the external finish passes ‘WBAC’ inspection it’s fine, paint correction, PPF and detailing add nothing to the value if you PX to a dealer or sell to an online buyer, they work on book plus there % adjustment less remedial work. Options add very little to the value as well. Arnold Clark told me I didn’t even need to have washed it.
If you have something interesting / rare or of high value then it may be worth investing in the paintwork, or of you have OCD.
It does make you wonder if they can't get something as basic as getting paint on the car right what other shortcuts and bodges are they making under the skin where you can't see it?
Assuming I'm not misreading the posts - I'd actually think the the opposite - that the engineering inside is probably sound and it's the finishing (aka "the arty stuff") that's lacking. They're probably dealt with by completely different departments.IanF wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2019 11:45 pmLast paragraph is my concern aswell.integrale_evo wrote: Sat Oct 12, 2019 10:35 pm It does make you wonder if they can't get something as basic as getting paint on the car right what other shortcuts and bodges are they making under the skin where you can't see it?
Defenders have a separate body and chassis. The chassis is steel and rust proofed (not necessarily well), but also it’s relatively simple to replace corroded sections. The bodies are aluminium so don’t rust (although they can corrode), but the bodies aren’t structural (because of the separate chassis) so that corrosion isn’t catastrophic unless bits of bodywork start falling off.Mito Man wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 12:11 am Surely the chassis is dipped for rust proofing so poor paint on the body panels shouldn’t affect it? (Of course the really dodgy model 3 linked earlier is an exception!). Defenders have no rust proofing but they keep going forever so I don’t think even some rust would lead to a sub 10 year old car being scrapped.
It’s clear the bottleneck at production must be the paint which has been rushed. Looking at the car again I would say that it’s been painted quickly and not received adequate paint in all the corners, not cured long enough, then assembled and had the water ingress test hence all the water spots in the clear coat, then it failed QC, had the lower half resprayed by hand this time but they did a crap job. Came to England, failed PDI, had more paintwork done yet again...
Which one, the Defender or the Tesla!V8Granite wrote: Sun Oct 13, 2019 10:03 am Anything that expensive has no excuse for being shoddy.
Dave!
The new wheels look awesome and RIC!