Bye bye Theresa

[Simon]

And whilst we're on the subject, what the fuck do the DUP want? Because their spokesman said on the radio yesterday that they 100% want Brexit (although NI voted remain), wanted to keep the integrity of the UK as one and wanted to keep the Irish border open, and confirmed they'd be voting against all the amendments yesterday (which would help to keep the border open). Are they fucking thick? They can't literally say they want opposing things!

So many MPs are just Trump thick.

[speedingfine]

Another vote on what? Leave with no deal or remain?

May's deal or remain, unless anyone's got any other ideas?

[NotoriousREV]

Stephen Barclay is a thick cunt, isn’t he?

“This house has continuously rejected leaving without a deal just as it has rejected not leaving at all.

'Therefore the only option is to find a way through which allows the UK to leave with a deal.”

Yeah, Stephen, the House has also rejected leaving with The Deal, or any other kind of deal.

[Simon]

So the house has:

Rejected no-deal
Rejected the only deal that exists with May's red lines
Rejected other possibilities ('CM2.0', EFTA+CU, CU, etc)
Rejected a second vote
Rejected revocation

The answer is clear. Get rid of the house.

[evostick]

After years of posturing and desperate measures leaving the EU remains the only logical outcome of the 2016 referendum

As a wise man once said...don't ask the fucking question if you don't want to know the answer.

[Swervin_Mervin]

Seems like the correct choice of amendments?

At first I thought so, but I think the EFTA/EEA option should have stayed on the list. I'm assuming it was dropped as it's close to the CM2.0 option, but crucially it doesn't propose a CU, so still quite different.

What should be taken from this is that the House is closer to agreeing what they do want than agreeing to TM's Deal.

[NotoriousREV]

Papers are saying it looks like tomorrow’s vote will be May’s Deal with a 2nd ref.

[Jimmy Choo]

Papers are saying it looks like tomorrow’s vote will be May’s Deal with a 2nd ref.

They'll reject that one too.

I'm bored of this now. I'm going to generalise that everyone in politics is a self serving, conniving shitehawk who should be first to the wall when the revolution comes.There is no consensus and there can be no consensus because it's too polarised a question. And the wrong question was asked, to the wrong people for the wrong reasons.

[Swervin_Mervin]

Papers are saying it looks like tomorrow’s vote will be May’s Deal with a 2nd ref.

You'd imagine Labour would whip against that. Telegraph reckons she's threatening a GE. Nothing good will come of that.

[dinny_g]

Nick Boles resignation last night was hilarious...

[Jobbo]

Does anyone trust the Government to run this country once we leave?

[JLv3.0]

Brexiters would appear to

[NotoriousREV]

There’s a groundswell of gammon thickos saying that if we don’t get a No Deal Brexit, they’ll never vote again. I hope so.

[JLv3.0]

Gammons - LITERALLY the only good thing to come out of this whole fucking shambles!

[speedingfine]

Papers are saying it looks like tomorrow’s vote will be May’s Deal with a 2nd ref.

Presumably with a remain option...?

[GG.]

Brexiters would appear to

I think the opposite, no?

The only thing that is worse that Theresa May's Brexit omnishambles is her interventionist domestic policy of 'ban everything that moves whilst copying the more centrist Labour policies'.

[JLv3.0]

Without bothering to read your words, as they are as incomprehensible and without conclusion as ever, my post was based on the Brexiteers' love of of retrieving our sovereignty. Therefore Brexiteers trust the Government to run the country.

Feel free to twist yourself into an absolute frenzy of over-analysis over the no-doubt cellular level of incorrectness in this post, I couldn't give a monkey's.

The etymology of every single word might be a good place to start. Off you go.

[Simon]

Papers are saying it looks like tomorrow’s vote will be May’s Deal with a 2nd ref.

They'll reject that one too.

I wouldn't bet on it. Across the parties MV3 was defeated by what, 58 votes? If you had just 30 people switch sides on the promise of a confirmatory referendum then that would be enough to get it over the line.

[GG.]

Without bothering to read your words, as they are as incomprehensible and without conclusion as ever, my post was based on the Brexiteers' love of of retrieving our sovereignty. Therefore Brexiteers trust the Government to run the country.

Jobbo said "once we leave" - i.e. ongoing competence given the mess made of the Brexit process.

Brexiteers don't think the process of leaving has been carried out by the government with any degree of success and no sovereignty has been regained so far so I'm not sure why you think Brexiteers trust the Government to run the country.

Sorry but I don't think that's pedantic - I just don't see your logic.

[JLv3.0]

OK.