Elon Musk/Tesla
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
And don't forget (re payload) that their Moon/Mars plan requires that "Ship" is carrying enough fuel with it to the moon such that it can slow itself down (with no atmospheric resistance to help), land, then take off from the Moon again, fly back to earth, and STILL have enough fuel to slow itself down and land again
Not sure what that earth-side deceleration would feel like to the crew though, going from a supersonic free fall to stationary on the ground in a few seconds (while rotating from horizontal to vertical at the same time)
Not sure what that earth-side deceleration would feel like to the crew though, going from a supersonic free fall to stationary on the ground in a few seconds (while rotating from horizontal to vertical at the same time)
Last edited by DaveE on Sat Jul 18, 2026 10:37 am, edited 2 times in total.
- integrale_evo
- Posts: 5806
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
Aren’t they only using 10% of their current datacentre / ai potential at the moment anyway? Or something like that from a vid I saw a while back. Yet they keep banging on about space data centres being necessary for future expansion.
As time goes on the whole thing doesn’t feel any less scammy.
Then you have below defending the massive energy and resource use of ai saying we need to keep growing it so it can provide the answers to make human life sustainable.
As time goes on the whole thing doesn’t feel any less scammy.
Then you have below defending the massive energy and resource use of ai saying we need to keep growing it so it can provide the answers to make human life sustainable.
Cheers, Harry
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
TBH if I was a scam artist trying to bump my stock price I’d say that we’re scrapping crewed flights. Saves the space and equipment needed to keep people alive and you can just say ai is gonna do itDaveE wrote: Sat Jul 18, 2026 10:36 am And don't forget (re payload) that their Moon/Mars plan requires that "Ship" is carrying enough fuel with it to the moon such that it can slow itself down (with no atmospheric resistance to help), land, then take off from the Moon again, fly back to earth, and STILL have enough fuel to slow itself down and land again
Not sure what that earth-side deceleration would feel like to the crew though, going from a supersonic free fall to stationary on the ground in a few seconds (while rotating from horizontal to vertical at the same time)
An absolute unit
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
Wait till the lockup period for existing holders ends. It'll be HILARIOUS.Beany wrote: Fri Jul 17, 2026 7:26 pm The SpaceX share price is one of the few objectively funny things around.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
There's also a non-zero chance it'll take the whole US economy with it, too, given SpaceX is apparently an """"AI"""" company, and it'll rattle everyone who's invested in the rest of them.
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
SPCX closed below $120 last night. Getting veeerry close to only 50% of it’s post-launch hype figure….
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
And it dropped into the $112's today. So that is now less than half of the $225.64 peak. Awesume.
(And I just noticed Tesla dropped > 20% this week too).
(And I just noticed Tesla dropped > 20% this week too).
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
Tesla is cooked, because they've gone from predicting thousands of robotaxis by the first half of 2025, to just a few dozen in tests now.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
This AI/robotics race is like a steam steam train falling off a cliff now

Also they’re eventually gonna have to recoup these costs. Wonder at what point it will become so expensive to subscribe to these services that it’s cheaper to hire an organic fleshy thing with blood running through it.

Also they’re eventually gonna have to recoup these costs. Wonder at what point it will become so expensive to subscribe to these services that it’s cheaper to hire an organic fleshy thing with blood running through it.
How about not having a sig at all?
- integrale_evo
- Posts: 5806
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
Are they though? They’ve failed to hit their predicted markers / implementations for literally decades now, or are people finally starting to have had enough?Simon wrote: Fri Jul 24, 2026 3:57 pm Tesla is cooked, because they've gone from predicting thousands of robotaxis by the first half of 2025, to just a few dozen in tests now.
Cheers, Harry
Re: Elon Musk/Tesla
If you look at the facts, including those I've stated, they haven't designed a whole new car for 10 years, they've binned off half their model range, the Cybertruck is a complete flop that needed SpaceX to buy a few of just to get them off the forecourt, FSD is years behind schedule and Robotaxi demands it, their robotaxi fleet is measured in dozens, not hundreds or thousands predicted before, Trump has dismantled the carbon credit scheme that earnt them billions a couple of years ago to mere millions now (in the US) whereas in Europe they are now competing not just with better conventional competitors, such as the germans electric fleet, but now the Chinese are coming in cheaper, more innovative and arguably better made. Not forgetting the salute, the ketamine or the political interference.
So no, even the fanboys are starting to turn. That and the earnings call this week was..... bad.
There is a school of thought that says Musk wants the price to go down so it's cheaper to roll into SpaceX, although as I've said elsewhere SpaceX itself hasn't found its floor yet. If Tesla and SpaceX stock both went to their 'true' value then Musk would be significantly poorer than he is now.
So no, even the fanboys are starting to turn. That and the earnings call this week was..... bad.
There is a school of thought that says Musk wants the price to go down so it's cheaper to roll into SpaceX, although as I've said elsewhere SpaceX itself hasn't found its floor yet. If Tesla and SpaceX stock both went to their 'true' value then Musk would be significantly poorer than he is now.
The artist formerly known as _Who_