Lego
Re: Lego
Yes, in the context of missing property, initially lying about it, then when presented with photographic evidence creating the most ridiculously convoluted "story" explaining its appearance. Then further testimony by their (ex?) employees of about it being unloaded with sets corresponding to the missing property on the dates in question, yes that is really suspicious.Jobbo wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 7:02 am New franchisee arrives with a truck and that’s suspicious? Really? This is why I’m not watching it - it’s speculation and conspiracy for engagement.
Coffeezilla knows their stuff, hence not being sued out of existence by Valve.
Re: Lego
RobYob wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 7:21 am Coffeezilla knows their stuff, hence not being sued out of existence by Valve.

Not sure what Valve has to do with Lego - isn't that an online game store?
If the new franchisee paid the franchisor for the franchise they acquired everything in that deal. If the old franchisee took goods on consignment and didn't document that, it's not the franchisor or the new franchisee's fault. As I said before, the old franchisee appears to be insolvent to the tune of hundreds of thousands of dollars. If they had sold every single set belonging to this guy and not paid him, he'd been an unsecured creditor and get nothing. There's only one party at fault here and the vendetta against the franchisor brand and the new franchisee would in the UK probably land Ben Schneider in prison.
Re: Lego
Its an example of Coffeezilla's investigative work in a previous comment you already replied to. Valve are a billion dollar game company who wisely did not sue Coffeezilla when he exposed their shady side.Jobbo wrote: Fri Jun 19, 2026 9:06 am Not sure what Valve has to do with Lego - isn't that an online game store?
If you want to dismiss that track record out of hand go ahead, frankly it's your loss and you look a bit silly assuming that the franchise is blameless. They are up to their necks in it and suing people to gag the conversation. I hope they get absolutely wrecked.
Re: Lego
The franshisor didn't have possession of the lost Lego - that's pretty fundamental. If there were proof they did, even circumstantial, it doesn't require a 55 minute video to demonstrate it.
Coffeezilla (who I've never heard of) wasn't sued by Valve (a billion dollar game company)? Hardly surprising - Streisand effect. They can ignore him and their business is probably unaffected. Valve not sueing him doesn't provide any evidence of the truth of his claims. And it's a separate thing entirely to the Lego dispute.
It does demonstrate that he's good at making money from Youtube, but so are many freemen of the land, auditors, Russell Brand etc.
Coffeezilla (who I've never heard of) wasn't sued by Valve (a billion dollar game company)? Hardly surprising - Streisand effect. They can ignore him and their business is probably unaffected. Valve not sueing him doesn't provide any evidence of the truth of his claims. And it's a separate thing entirely to the Lego dispute.
It does demonstrate that he's good at making money from Youtube, but so are many freemen of the land, auditors, Russell Brand etc.
Re: Lego
Rob is correct, Coffezilla is the guys long form, produced videos, Voidzilla is typically shorter, snappier stuff on a wide range of subjects, from youtubers getting in with obvious grifters, to crypto scams, to the Epstein files
https://www.youtube.com/@coffeezillaextras/videos
I don't tend to watch the long form stuff, but there’s regularly interesting bits in the void channel
https://www.youtube.com/@coffeezillaextras/videos
I don't tend to watch the long form stuff, but there’s regularly interesting bits in the void channel