Today’s want

User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 13009
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Jobbo »

Mito Man wrote: Wed Jun 03, 2026 1:23 pm I like it but at £29k it’s not very appealing. I prefer the Rotrex route, only up to 300bhp but DIY friendly and looks OEM+
£29k includes suspension and so on I think. The basic stage 1 engine is under £7k+VAT, so there's labour obviously in it too. I'd like to know a bit more about what you get for £29k; if you go for the £75k+ restomod you get a bare metal respray, so buying a car which doesn't need a respray must surely be the way to do it. Get a really good mk1 or mk2 for sub-£10k as a basis. I'd probably want to stop there though...
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12872
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Mito Man »

Jobbo wrote: Wed Jun 03, 2026 1:46 pm
£29k includes suspension and so on I think. The basic stage 1 engine is under £7k+VAT, so there's labour obviously in it too. I'd like to know a bit more about what you get for £29k; if you go for the £75k+ restomod you get a bare metal respray, so buying a car which doesn't need a respray must surely be the way to do it. Get a really good mk1 or mk2 for sub-£10k as a basis. I'd probably want to stop there though...
You already have a mint car ready for this
https://www.evo.co.uk/mazda/mx-5/205842 ... ter-driven
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 13009
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Jobbo »

Apart from the ND3 not yet being tunable by BBR, I have no desire to alter a fairly new car which is already fast enough. There's something about the way the Jag V6 fits in the mk1 and mk2 which appeals.
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 1112
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: Today’s want

Post by MikeHunt »

Mito Man wrote: Wed Jun 03, 2026 1:23 pm I like it but at £29k it’s not very appealing. I prefer the Rotrex route, only up to 300bhp but DIY friendly and looks OEM+
I think I mentioned the rocketeer in this thread when it was in the magazine, the cost goes up to £115k :shock:
IanF
Posts: 3921
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by IanF »

Yeah, it says £110k inc donor in the Evo piece; suddenly less desirable. How much is a 997 GT3 these days?..

ETA - same price https://www.autotrader.co.uk/car-detail ... um=ios-app
Cheers,

Ian
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12872
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Mito Man »

You’d need a lobotomy at that price. Mind you I think the E46 M3 Touring is worse. At least with the MX5 you get an upgrade and not just a bigger boot that you can’t realistically utilise because of the cost of the thing :lol:
How about not having a sig at all?
IanF
Posts: 3921
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by IanF »

Last edited by IanF on Sun Jun 14, 2026 9:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cheers,

Ian
speedingfine
Posts: 2748
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 1:05 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by speedingfine »

Not convinced by those wheels, much prefer these:

Image
Send me links to cars for sale with throttle bodies.
IanF
Posts: 3921
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by IanF »

speedingfine wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 9:35 pm Not convinced by those wheels, much prefer these:

Image
looks good, but not sure I like those wheels. Need to see one irl
Cheers,

Ian
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12872
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Mito Man »

For the price of those 2 maybe you can get a Midsummer instead.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 13009
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm

Re: Today’s want

Post by Jobbo »

speedingfine wrote: Sun Jun 14, 2026 9:35 pm Not convinced by those wheels, much prefer these:
I agree with Chris, but I also didn’t know the Supersport came with the alloys in Ian’s link at all. The standard ones are a different design.

Edit: just checked the configurator and there they are, the middle choice. Heavier than the superlight 18” standard alloys, not forged like the 19” optional ones in Chris’s photo;
definitely the worst choice from a technical standpoint too.
Post Reply