KiwiDave wrote: Thu Jul 17, 2025 2:24 am
That's 20,000 shades of cool as fuck. Does it have glass in it?
I spent a lot of time getting into shooting panoramic images, kinda before software did it all for you and there was a heap of technique involved. I then promptly realised printing any and framing them became really hard because a frame with glass meant finding pieces of glass that would resists the twist and tension inevitable from something that shape.
I am still harbouring (see what I did there) a want to print and frame some of them though. I imagine the fact it's on a shelf rather than mounted really helps.
Cheers! You should definitely do it. This one is 6 photos originally - you can just see the bandings in the image. I say 'photo' but expect these were glass plates back in the mid 19th century. The bio of the photographer is here - including the original image I have (hadn't seen that until today!)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Felice_Beato
The frame certainly does have glass in it - description of the framers was as below:
Posters to be dry mounted to dibond, matched together at centre line to make one piece. Trim to remove copyright bottom
right corner. Box frame in 12x45mm splined black walnut profile. With matching timber fillets. Glazed with 3mm AR70 anti-reflective glass offering 70% UV protection. Subframe with integrated split batten hanging system.
I didn't take a picture of the back but it has some pretty industrial bracing to give it rigidity - I did ask about this as I was concerned how stable it would be. I should have known better though as the guy I use does art gallery exhibitions and interestingly given my line of work, has just been commissioned to re-frame the entire art collection at a Magic Circle law firm (I expect I am probably an irritation to him at this stage

)