737 Max

DaveE
Posts: 1694
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by DaveE »

"Sole Survivor", a 1982 made-for-TV movie.

It features a plane crash where a pilot appears to survive, but is later revealed to have died in the cockpit.

I remember seeing this at the time and it put the willies up me
User avatar
JonMad
Posts: 2938
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:25 pm
Currently Driving: 2015 Swift; 2012 Yeti; 2006 Fabia

Re: 737 Max

Post by JonMad »

Reminded me of Unbreakable. Looks like he was still in the plane but alive after it crashed, not that he somehow got ejected from the wreckage.
Terrible situation. I think I read as well that someone jumped out of a second story window of a building to escape :shock:
Left over crest; tightens.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 11813
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by Mito Man »

It’s absolutely crazy. It’s even more crazy he didn’t get knocked out for a bit - he saw everyone around him die at the moment of impact whilst walking away himself. I can’t get my head around that. Hopefully he’s of strong mental fortitude.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14189
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by mik »

New footage shows how the plane climbs sluggishly and then just sinks.

Speculation around dual-engine bird strikes - but there is no smoke visible. Fuel issue? Or just not enough airspeed / power / inappropriate flap setting.




I’ve also seen speculation that it could be like this incident - where a typo into the gizmo used to calculate take-off performance aspects removed 100tonnes from the actual weight of the plane (with flap and throttle settings and the rotation speed therefore significantly miscalculated).

User avatar
Delphi
Posts: 902
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:11 am
Location: Leeds, West Yorkshire
Currently Driving: 1987 Porsche 928 S4
2025 Skoda Kodiaq SE

Re: 737 Max

Post by Delphi »

Looks like the flaps weren't deployed (which they absolutely have to be for takeoff) which explains the lack of lift. Question is - why? Did the pilots think they were deployed and they weren't? Unlikely they'd forget as that's takeoff 101. Also the landing gear is down which is unusual.
If you get all wobbly-lipped about the opinion of Internet strangers, maybe it's time to take a bath with the toaster as you'll never amount to sh1t anyway.
User avatar
scotta
Posts: 3464
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:28 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by scotta »

Mentour pilot has done an initial video - No flaps set on a 787 should have alarms wailing in the cockpit on roll out. looks like it had take off thrust then just lost it.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14189
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by mik »

scotta wrote: Fri Jun 13, 2025 4:21 pm Mentour pilot has done an initial video - No flaps set on a 787 should have alarms wailing in the cockpit on roll out. looks like it had take off thrust then just lost it.
Same conclusion from this guy - I've skipped the section where he explains exactly that, and moved to what he thinks actually occured.

User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 5317
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by integrale_evo »

I haven’t bothered watching many of these vids because they all seem to waffle on for 20mins with maybe a minute of decent information hidden somewhere within it.

The initial climb looked fine, surely miscalculations, wrong flap settings, struggling to gain speed mean a long lingering takeoff, and tings get easier once you’re well off the ground?

From my incredibly amateur view is just looks like it lost power for some reason and dropped. No smoke, no flames, no crazy manoeuvres. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see the how and why’s.
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14189
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by mik »

integrale_evo wrote: Sun Jun 15, 2025 8:59 am I haven’t bothered watching many of these vids because they all seem to waffle on for 20mins with…….
TL : DR
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3730
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: 737 Max

Post by Gavster »

Like Harry I’ve not watched the videos, but do they mention how a load of in flight stuff wasn’t working on the previous flight leg? I’ve seen videos showing how entertainment systems etc were already non functional on the plane. Does it point towards simply power failing?
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14189
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by mik »

This one contains new info and is pretty good. So you probably shouldn’t watch it either. :?

Edit: although he’s clearly excited to bring this new evidence and emits a couple of giggles that don’t feel massively appropriate :?

tim
Posts: 1822
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: 737 Max

Post by tim »

Ghouls the lot of them, trading on death for views and ad revenue.
You settle up, I'll go get the Jag.
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 7885
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by Beany »

I had a look at some in cockpit take off videos on the 787 and the cockpit layout in general, and quite frankly his explanation of 'whoopsied the flaps when should have doopsied the landing gear' looked like bollocks just from that. The controls aren't even on the same part of the cockpit. (flaps on the 'transmission tunnel', landing gear up on the 'dash')

Pretty poor show to slander what can be assumed to be a competent flight crew - who can't defend themselves because they're fuckin' dead - because he was too lazy to google how the plane actually works.
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 5317
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by integrale_evo »

The worst are the dumb lazy animations showing the plane nose diving into buildings. Disgusting lazy clickbait.
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 5382
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: 737 Max

Post by Simon »

This is the best I've seen on the subject.

The artist formerly known as _Who_
Post Reply