Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 5945
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by DeskJockey »

As a regular user of the Dartford crossing I'll applaud anything that eases the traffic volumes. Outside of very early/late night crossings, I can't remember not being delayed. It is never less than 10 minutes and on occasion it has been well over an hour. Even when crossing it is slow, 50 being aspirational.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5529
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Some of us outside the SE would just like some funds to implement the infrastructure projects needed elsewhere, though - but we're often told there's no money for them. It's bitterness, not an aversion to national infrastructure projects.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12158
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Jobbo »

Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:14 am In the east the main problem is that any kind of issue in the Blackwall tunnel (broken down car, crash, stoppage etc) then it absolutely gridlocks the whole area, plus goods vehicles aren't allowed through Rotherhithe tunnel, so in a van you suddenly you have to divert to either Tower Bridge or Dartford to get across the river, which is a complete PITA and usually turns a 30 in journey into a 90+ minute one :shock:
This is further east than Dartford so won't change anything for those people. We need better crossings within the M25; I acknowledge that a foot bridge at Surrey Quays isn't going to be the answer for commercial vehicles of course.
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3874
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Gavster »

Yeah, the 2022 Department for Levelling Up Housing and Communities agenda was meant to address regional development, in fact the whole levelling up policy document was specifically about non-London investment, although to be fair it was just a drop in the ocean, probably wasn't implemented and not really about infrastructure either. Which proves your point really.
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3874
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Gavster »

Jobbo wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:21 am
Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:14 am In the east the main problem is that any kind of issue in the Blackwall tunnel (broken down car, crash, stoppage etc) then it absolutely gridlocks the whole area, plus goods vehicles aren't allowed through Rotherhithe tunnel, so in a van you suddenly you have to divert to either Tower Bridge or Dartford to get across the river, which is a complete PITA and usually turns a 30 in journey into a 90+ minute one :shock:
This is further east than Dartford so won't change anything for those people. We need better crossings within the M25; I acknowledge that a foot bridge at Surrey Quays isn't going to be the answer for commercial vehicles of course.
Yeah I know, that post was about the Silvertown tunnel! :lol:
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12158
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Jobbo »

Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:23 am
Jobbo wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:21 am
Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:14 am In the east the main problem is that any kind of issue in the Blackwall tunnel (broken down car, crash, stoppage etc) then it absolutely gridlocks the whole area, plus goods vehicles aren't allowed through Rotherhithe tunnel, so in a van you suddenly you have to divert to either Tower Bridge or Dartford to get across the river, which is a complete PITA and usually turns a 30 in journey into a 90+ minute one :shock:
This is further east than Dartford so won't change anything for those people. We need better crossings within the M25; I acknowledge that a foot bridge at Surrey Quays isn't going to be the answer for commercial vehicles of course.
Yeah I know, that post was about the Silvertown tunnel! :lol:
Blimey, how many tunnels do you want? Surely there ought to be a tunnel between North Devon and South Wales before you join together Kent and Essex any more :lol:
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 3874
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Gavster »

That's a pretty cool idea to be fair 🤔
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5529
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

I've often wondered why on earth there hasn't been a ferry service between the two. It's quite a distance though.
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by dinny_g »

I'd sooner have a new M6 Toll Road from about Jct 18 to 27 or 28 - Bypass all of Manchester.

I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only :lol:
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5529
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

dinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:03 am I'd sooner have a new M6 Toll Road from about Jct 18 to 27 or 28 - Bypass all of Manchester.

I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only :lol:
The M6 doesn't go through Manchester, Dinny :lol:
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12149
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by Mito Man »

If we’re doing selfish requests I’d like the M20 to be joined up to the M27 (so Folkestone region to Portsmouth). It’s a bit crazy that to go from the South East to any other Southern location you have to travel up to the M25 and back down. It’s all too London centric!

And I am happy about the approved Thames crossing, Dartford is always a choke point and if travelling north I tend to almost always go around the western side
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14666
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by mik »

Population of Scotland is 5.4 million.

If this helps keep London's 8.9 million population where they are, then I'm all for it. ;)
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 5945
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by DeskJockey »

Mito Man wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:16 am If we’re doing selfish requests I’d like the M20 to be joined up to the M27 (so Folkestone region to Portsmouth). It’s a bit crazy that to go from the South East to any other Southern location you have to travel up to the M25 and back down. It’s all too London centric!

And I am happy about the approved Thames crossing, Dartford is always a choke point and if travelling north I tend to almost always go around the western side
Not sure how selfish that is, really. A large part of the issues with the M25 is that traffic is forced in to go out elsewhere, unless you fancy bumbling along on smaller/slow roads.

As a principle to get traffic moving around it would make sense.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by dinny_g »

Swervin_Mervin wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:06 am
dinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:03 am I'd sooner have a new M6 Toll Road from about Jct 18 to 27 or 28 - Bypass all of Manchester.

I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only :lol:
The M6 doesn't go through Manchester, Dinny :lol:
My new toll road would pass by Manchester… ;) :D

It would also have no junctions on it at all - you join at 18, leave at 28
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 5945
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by DeskJockey »

dinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:42 am
Swervin_Mervin wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:06 am
dinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:03 am I'd sooner have a new M6 Toll Road from about Jct 18 to 27 or 28 - Bypass all of Manchester.

I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only :lol:
The M6 doesn't go through Manchester, Dinny :lol:
My new toll road would pass by Manchester… ;) :D

It would also have no junctions on it at all - you join at 18, leave at 28
Surely you'd then leave at 19? No other junctions.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5551
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by duncs500 »

Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:08 am This is my point though, it's ridiculously difficult to implement massive projects to perfect standards in such a busy, expensive and crowded island and there will always be inefficiencies as a result.
@Gavster @V8Granite You're kinda both right TBH. Yes, it is difficult to do, not helped by the sheer scale of legislation and bureaucracy involved. However these projects are run in their entirety by consultants with zero skin in the game except the longer it goes on, the more money they make. Usually the client organisation is managed by seconded consultants, often even from the same design / delivery organisations working on the project in a delivery capacity.

Having worked for contractors whose employees genuinely want to get on and build stuff (often for no other reason than it's ingrained in their nature to smash a job out and move on to the next one), it's incredibly frustrating to have 'client' consultants holding up progress for often spurious reasons (spelling mistakes in documents for example!).

Now being a consultant I still have that drive to get the job done, but when I hit a brick wall of frustration at least I can sit back and think "ah well, I'm getting paid no matter what". :D
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by dinny_g »

DeskJockey wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 12:25 pm Surely you'd then leave at 19? No other junctions.
My new road would follow the existing M6 Toll naming convention.
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 5945
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by DeskJockey »

dinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 2:28 pm
DeskJockey wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 12:25 pm Surely you'd then leave at 19? No other junctions.
My new road would follow the existing M6 Toll naming convention.
That'll be confusing, but it is your road, so who am I to argue?
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 6622
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by dinny_g »

Junction 19 to 27 will remain on the current M6.

Join the new toll at junction 18, re-join the old M6 at 28.

Not sure what's confusing but given I'm making the point, I'm prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt.. :lol:
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14666
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.

Post by mik »

@dinny_g as it's your road, will you be adding any special features to relieve boredom such as an homage to Alton Towers Corkscrew?

Image
Post Reply