Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 5945
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
As a regular user of the Dartford crossing I'll applaud anything that eases the traffic volumes. Outside of very early/late night crossings, I can't remember not being delayed. It is never less than 10 minutes and on occasion it has been well over an hour. Even when crossing it is slow, 50 being aspirational.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Some of us outside the SE would just like some funds to implement the infrastructure projects needed elsewhere, though - but we're often told there's no money for them. It's bitterness, not an aversion to national infrastructure projects.
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
This is further east than Dartford so won't change anything for those people. We need better crossings within the M25; I acknowledge that a foot bridge at Surrey Quays isn't going to be the answer for commercial vehicles of course.Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:14 am In the east the main problem is that any kind of issue in the Blackwall tunnel (broken down car, crash, stoppage etc) then it absolutely gridlocks the whole area, plus goods vehicles aren't allowed through Rotherhithe tunnel, so in a van you suddenly you have to divert to either Tower Bridge or Dartford to get across the river, which is a complete PITA and usually turns a 30 in journey into a 90+ minute one![]()
- Gavster
- Posts: 3874
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
- Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Yeah, the 2022 Department for Levelling Up Housing and Communities agenda was meant to address regional development, in fact the whole levelling up policy document was specifically about non-London investment, although to be fair it was just a drop in the ocean, probably wasn't implemented and not really about infrastructure either. Which proves your point really.
- Gavster
- Posts: 3874
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
- Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Yeah I know, that post was about the Silvertown tunnel!Jobbo wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:21 amThis is further east than Dartford so won't change anything for those people. We need better crossings within the M25; I acknowledge that a foot bridge at Surrey Quays isn't going to be the answer for commercial vehicles of course.Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:14 am In the east the main problem is that any kind of issue in the Blackwall tunnel (broken down car, crash, stoppage etc) then it absolutely gridlocks the whole area, plus goods vehicles aren't allowed through Rotherhithe tunnel, so in a van you suddenly you have to divert to either Tower Bridge or Dartford to get across the river, which is a complete PITA and usually turns a 30 in journey into a 90+ minute one![]()

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Blimey, how many tunnels do you want? Surely there ought to be a tunnel between North Devon and South Wales before you join together Kent and Essex any moreGavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:23 amYeah I know, that post was about the Silvertown tunnel!Jobbo wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:21 amThis is further east than Dartford so won't change anything for those people. We need better crossings within the M25; I acknowledge that a foot bridge at Surrey Quays isn't going to be the answer for commercial vehicles of course.Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:14 am In the east the main problem is that any kind of issue in the Blackwall tunnel (broken down car, crash, stoppage etc) then it absolutely gridlocks the whole area, plus goods vehicles aren't allowed through Rotherhithe tunnel, so in a van you suddenly you have to divert to either Tower Bridge or Dartford to get across the river, which is a complete PITA and usually turns a 30 in journey into a 90+ minute one![]()
![]()

- Gavster
- Posts: 3874
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
- Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
That's a pretty cool idea to be fair 
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
I've often wondered why on earth there hasn't been a ferry service between the two. It's quite a distance though.
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
I'd sooner have a new M6 Toll Road from about Jct 18 to 27 or 28 - Bypass all of Manchester.
I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only
I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only

- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
The M6 doesn't go through Manchester, Dinnydinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:03 am I'd sooner have a new M6 Toll Road from about Jct 18 to 27 or 28 - Bypass all of Manchester.
I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only![]()

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
If we’re doing selfish requests I’d like the M20 to be joined up to the M27 (so Folkestone region to Portsmouth). It’s a bit crazy that to go from the South East to any other Southern location you have to travel up to the M25 and back down. It’s all too London centric!
And I am happy about the approved Thames crossing, Dartford is always a choke point and if travelling north I tend to almost always go around the western side
And I am happy about the approved Thames crossing, Dartford is always a choke point and if travelling north I tend to almost always go around the western side
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Population of Scotland is 5.4 million.
If this helps keep London's 8.9 million population where they are, then I'm all for it.
If this helps keep London's 8.9 million population where they are, then I'm all for it.

- DeskJockey
- Posts: 5945
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Not sure how selfish that is, really. A large part of the issues with the M25 is that traffic is forced in to go out elsewhere, unless you fancy bumbling along on smaller/slow roads.Mito Man wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:16 am If we’re doing selfish requests I’d like the M20 to be joined up to the M27 (so Folkestone region to Portsmouth). It’s a bit crazy that to go from the South East to any other Southern location you have to travel up to the M25 and back down. It’s all too London centric!
And I am happy about the approved Thames crossing, Dartford is always a choke point and if travelling north I tend to almost always go around the western side
As a principle to get traffic moving around it would make sense.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
My new toll road would pass by Manchester…Swervin_Mervin wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:06 amThe M6 doesn't go through Manchester, Dinnydinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:03 am I'd sooner have a new M6 Toll Road from about Jct 18 to 27 or 28 - Bypass all of Manchester.
I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only![]()
![]()


It would also have no junctions on it at all - you join at 18, leave at 28
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 5945
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Surely you'd then leave at 19? No other junctions.dinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:42 amMy new toll road would pass by Manchester…Swervin_Mervin wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:06 amThe M6 doesn't go through Manchester, Dinnydinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 11:03 am I'd sooner have a new M6 Toll Road from about Jct 18 to 27 or 28 - Bypass all of Manchester.
I appreciate this is a bit selfish as it benefits me for my one or two trips per year to the lakes but given the cult of the individual, I EXPECT government to be customised to my needs only![]()
![]()
![]()
It would also have no junctions on it at all - you join at 18, leave at 28
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
@Gavster @V8Granite You're kinda both right TBH. Yes, it is difficult to do, not helped by the sheer scale of legislation and bureaucracy involved. However these projects are run in their entirety by consultants with zero skin in the game except the longer it goes on, the more money they make. Usually the client organisation is managed by seconded consultants, often even from the same design / delivery organisations working on the project in a delivery capacity.Gavster wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 10:08 am This is my point though, it's ridiculously difficult to implement massive projects to perfect standards in such a busy, expensive and crowded island and there will always be inefficiencies as a result.
Having worked for contractors whose employees genuinely want to get on and build stuff (often for no other reason than it's ingrained in their nature to smash a job out and move on to the next one), it's incredibly frustrating to have 'client' consultants holding up progress for often spurious reasons (spelling mistakes in documents for example!).
Now being a consultant I still have that drive to get the job done, but when I hit a brick wall of frustration at least I can sit back and think "ah well, I'm getting paid no matter what".

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
My new road would follow the existing M6 Toll naming convention.
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 5945
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
That'll be confusing, but it is your road, so who am I to argue?dinny_g wrote: Wed Mar 26, 2025 2:28 pmMy new road would follow the existing M6 Toll naming convention.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
Junction 19 to 27 will remain on the current M6.
Join the new toll at junction 18, re-join the old M6 at 28.
Not sure what's confusing but given I'm making the point, I'm prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt..
Join the new toll at junction 18, re-join the old M6 at 28.
Not sure what's confusing but given I'm making the point, I'm prepared to give you the benefit of the doubt..

Re: Lower Thames Crossing approved by government.
@dinny_g as it's your road, will you be adding any special features to relieve boredom such as an homage to Alton Towers Corkscrew?

