I guess I was being lazy. My point really was that protected designation of origin rules are a European agreement that designates Champagne as the sparkling wine using the traditional method from the Epernay and Reims area of France. Being a EC agreement, that regional protection is only actually effective in the EU and therefore anyone outside the EU, such as America or Russia can use méthode champenoise to produce sparkling wine that would be similar in charachter to champagne, then call it champagne, and nobody can do much about that. Even though we know it's not real champagne and that genuine French champagne will still carry higher value in those countries.
Gavster wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 8:27 am
I totally get that!
I guess I was being lazy. My point really was that protected designation of origin rules are a European agreement that designates Champagne as the sparkling wine using the traditional method from the Epernay and Reims area of France. Being a EC agreement, that regional protection is only actually effective in the EU and therefore anyone outside the EU, such as America or Russia can use méthode champenoise to produce sparkling wine that would be similar in charachter to champagne, then call it champagne, and nobody can do much about that. Even though we know it's not real champagne and that genuine French champagne will still carry higher value in those countries.
I think there's a world version of that agreement. I remember talking to someone about agvaves being grown in Queensland - they are very suited to the climate there. But because it's not Mexico, they are not allowed to make Tequila. They have to call it cactus juice or agave spirit.
The Evo forum really is a shadow of its former self. I remember when the internet was for the elite and now they seem to let any spastic on
It's all nonsense. Cava, champagne, sparkling wine. Just stick a new name on it and go. The French don't seem too bothered with that as the champagne producers have been buying all the chalk based farmland in SE England to plant Chardonnay and penis Noir.
Gavster wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 6:58 am
Fun fact, Russia has produced its own ‘champagne’, which is marketed as, and called champagne, since forever.
The whole point of regional protection is that people calling it that doesn’t make it so.
There’s a certain level of buying into that idea needed or you end up going along with selling English perry as champagne
Even the French are flexible with that rule, changing the champagne region's boundaries in recent years, to the massive win for some producers and massive loss of others.
Yeah, the whole thing is capitalist protectionism, it’s just funny that once again Trump the famous business understander doesn’t understand any of this stuff.
I went to the Codorniu winery near Barcelona about 20 years ago, and went round the production part. They use exactly the same method traditionelle as French champagne and have loads of old murals and so on calling it Codorniu Champagne around the buildings; it's a really lovely place. It's only allowed to be called Cava now of course, but having seen the care they take over production and obviously liking the taste, I do think it's a far better substitute for actual champagne than prosecco, which seems to have become the default cheaper option.
Jobbo wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:06 pm
I went to the Codorniu winery near Barcelona about 20 years ago, and went round the production part. They use exactly the same method traditionelle as French champagne and have loads of old murals and so on calling it Codorniu Champagne around the buildings; it's a really lovely place. It's only allowed to be called Cava now of course, but having seen the care they take over production and obviously liking the taste, I do think it's a far better substitute for actual champagne than prosecco, which seems to have become the default cheaper option.
I've had some decent Cavas before, but prosecco I just find a bit rough. I'm not that into champagne either. That said, I think Nyetimber is bloody lovely and shows up just how crap a lot of "proper" champagne is.
ZedLeg wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:03 pm
Yeah, the whole thing is capitalist protectionism, it’s just funny that once again Trump the famous business understander doesn’t understand any of this stuff.
Just saying "oh but it's capitalism" seems a narrow assessment. PDO and PGI are more about cultural heritage and food sovereignty by protecting historic localised food systems, production methods and values.
ZedLeg wrote: Fri Mar 14, 2025 1:03 pm
Yeah, the whole thing is capitalist protectionism, it’s just funny that once again Trump the famous business understander doesn’t understand any of this stuff.
Just saying "oh but it's capitalism" seems a narrow assessment. PDO and PGI are more about cultural heritage and food sovereignty by protecting historic localised food systems, production methods and values.
It’s only relevant within the framework of capitalism is my point.
Like, would it matter if there wasn’t more money to be made calling your sparkling wine champagne?
trade wars are not good, nor are they easy to win. they’re big, messy, and have a funny way of blowing right the fuck up in your big dumb pumpkin face.