https://www.roadandtrack.com/news/a6291 ... nds-study/
Plenty of CG’s drive them of course, but I suspect this may be related to the number of NCG’s who now have access to significant power/performance for the first time in their driving careers?

I stand corrected!Explosive Newt wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 12:01 pm The source data is here https://www.iseecars.com/most-dangerous ... udy#v=2024
Top ten...
1. Hyundai Venue
2. Chevvy Corvette
3. Mitsubishi Mirage
4. Porsche 911
5. Honda CR-V hybrid
6. Tesla Model Y
7. Mitsubishi Mirage G4
8. Buick Encore GX
9. Kia Forte
10. Buick Envision
I think Porsche and Chevvy probably also attract people who can't handle the power. And the SUVs driven by people who can't handle the size!
thank Elon for producing the safest car in the planet. if it was any other car, 2 children would have died and their cat would have got herpes…integrale_evo wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:56 pm
Got knows how they managed to get it out of shape like that!
Ah, the reason for Elon's cost-cutting removal of an indicator stalk becomes clear!integrale_evo wrote: Tue Nov 19, 2024 6:56 pm Teslas also seem to be the cars I see which are least likely to use indicators.
And yes - I constantly think they have full beams on but it becomes apparent that they haven't when they get closer, so the beams are aiming upwards slightly. Hopefully they'll all fail MOTs. Both Model 3 and Model Y seem to suffer; I never see a Model S or Model X these days.Swervin_Mervin wrote: Thu Nov 21, 2024 10:06 am Don't know if anyone else has noticed this, but there seem to be a high proportion of Tesla's with shocking headlights or headlight aim. I mean, I reckon they're even worse than JLR for it.