BMW's naming strategy

sec
Posts: 53
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:06 pm

BMW's naming strategy

Post by sec »

Now the 35i engine goes 4 cylinder...:roll:

https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-ger ... m35i/38716
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11517
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Rich B »

18 Inch brake discs?! ๐Ÿค”
User avatar
Gavin
Posts: 2002
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm
Currently Driving: Audi S5, R56 Cooper S

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Gavin »

18" front discs??????????? :o How big are those wheels then?

Looks like any Kia or Hyundai from the back
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11517
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Rich B »

Absolute bollocks. The M3/4 has 370mm discs. 18inch is over 450mm.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 10745
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by nuttinnew »

Looks shit.
User avatar
McSwede
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:04 pm

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by McSwede »

That's one of the reasons that the current M140i appealled to me. It'll soon be a transverse 4 with front or x-drive and a whole heap less desirable
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14649
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by mik »

It is monumentally stoopid. :evil:

As noted recently. Helped SIL buy a 118i recently. Which is a 1.5 turbo. Of course. :roll:
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11517
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Rich B »

mik wrote: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:25 pm It is monumentally stoopid. :evil:

As noted recently. Helped SIL buy a 118i recently. Which is a 1.5 turbo. Of course. :roll:
theyre all at it though. The Merc A180 is also a 1.5 turbo.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14649
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by mik »

I know. They can all FO. :evil:
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5527
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Are we already back round to going through the whole history of incorrect BMW naming strategy?

Wife likes the X2. I don't dislike it apart from it a) being an SUV therefore turd and 2: it having rubbish drivetrain options (fwd and low power petrols).

Ergo this seems like a promising compromise. SUrprised it's not Xdrive though, given that the current top diesel engined models are :?: Or maybe just turd reporting
User avatar
McSwede
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:04 pm

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by McSwede »

mik wrote: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:25 pm It is monumentally stoopid. :evil:

As noted recently. Helped SIL buy a 118i recently. Which is a 1.5 turbo. Of course. :roll:
Most people will understand the hierarchy of the model range (bigger number = it being more betterer ๐Ÿ˜‚) but most people couldn't give a fuck what's under the bonnet because they treat cars like white goods.

Several people have asked me if my car is a 4ltr.
User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by JLv3.0 »

McSwede wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:07 ammost people couldn't give a fuck
FTFY. For all situations.
User avatar
McSwede
Posts: 3307
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:04 pm

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by McSwede »

JLv3.0 wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:13 am
McSwede wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:07 ammost people couldn't give a fuck
FTFY. For all situations.
You are correct ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜‚
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11517
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Rich B »

McSwede wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:07 am
mik wrote: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:25 pm It is monumentally stoopid. :evil:

As noted recently. Helped SIL buy a 118i recently. Which is a 1.5 turbo. Of course. :roll:
Most people will understand the hierarchy of the model range (bigger number = it being more betterer ๐Ÿ˜‚) but most people couldn't give a fuck what's under the bonnet because they treat cars like white goods.

Several people have asked me if my car is a 4ltr.
only proper ///M cars are 4ltr... ๐Ÿ˜ƒ
User avatar
Marv
Posts: 1683
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:33 pm
Contact:

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Marv »

Rich B wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:10 amonly proper ///M cars are 4ltr... ๐Ÿ˜ƒ
๐Ÿค”
Oui, je suis un motard.
User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by JLv3.0 »

The little kiddie versions, maybe.
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11517
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Rich B »

Marv wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:12 am
Rich B wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:10 amonly proper ///M cars are 4ltr... ๐Ÿ˜ƒ
๐Ÿค”
only proper M cars are 3.2 ltr too!
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12130
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Jobbo »

I spotted a lease deal on a new shape Audi A6 40TDI the other day. Assuming that 40 must mean it was the 3.0 V6 TDI, I was surprised to find it's actually the new name for the 2.0TDI. So I don't think alternative naming conventions are any better.
User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4784
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by JLv3.0 »

Isn't there some truly horribly complex equation for how Audi name their cars now? Or was that a joke that I didn't get?
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11517
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Post by Rich B »

JLv3.0 wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:03 am Isn't there some truly horribly complex equation for how Audi name their cars now? Or was that a joke that I didn't get?
i remember you talking about that a while ago - I donโ€™t think itโ€™s found itโ€™s way here yet, but it did sound ridiculous!
Post Reply