Bye bye Starmer
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Yeah, diplomats don’t get paid as much as you’d think do they.
The carrot must be the hope of an ambassadorial or cabinet post.
Just increase their allowance.
The carrot must be the hope of an ambassadorial or cabinet post.
Just increase their allowance.
An absolute unit
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Oh yeah, I'm fine with that. I just can't get my head around not increasing their allowance and, instead, asking a business to now give a discount to cover the increase!ZedLeg wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 3:19 pm Yeah, diplomats don’t get paid as much as you’d think do they.
The carrot must be the hope of an ambassadorial or cabinet post.
Just increase their allowance.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Bear in mind the foreign office pays up to 90% of the school fee.
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Bye bye Starmer
The percentage they pay should stay the same, increase the payment to make it work.
An absolute unit
- Gavster
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
- Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats
Re: Bye bye Starmer
It's not that, it's because having a solar farm creates a consistent income stream that can be higher per acre, and far less volatile than arable crops. Also the farmer doesn't need to do much either, nor worry about droughts or rains ruining their crop, because the sun comes up every day for the solar. Some farms also have animals grazing amongst the solar panels. Or maybe you'd prefer arable crops to be grown, you know wheat, barley etc the stuff you don't eat

- Gavster
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
- Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I meant to say - if a farmer's entire crop fails because of rain or drought, they make a loss for the year, simple as that. It's understandable that solar makes sense with our current high energy prices, until we crash into the sun.
But then again, it also makes sense to develop mixed farming methods so they don't rely on one single crop either.
But then again, it also makes sense to develop mixed farming methods so they don't rely on one single crop either.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I imagine all those large solar farm projects are funded by large corporations. They cost millions to set up, I doubt even someone like Clarkson could afford the initial outlay.
How about not having a sig at all?
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
They are. Like wind farms also. The landowner will just get a "rent", for want of a better word.Mito Man wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 5:14 pm I imagine all those large solar farm projects are funded by large corporations. They cost millions to set up, I doubt even someone like Clarkson could afford the initial outlay.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Is the rent a pittance? I'd imagine just chucking wild flower seeds and entering the stewardship scheme would be better and you won't end up with land which will not be tied up forever more and looking out to an eyesore.
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Bye bye Starmer
They can put loads of bloody cows on itGavster wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 4:13 pmIt's not that, it's because having a solar farm creates a consistent income stream that can be higher per acre, and far less volatile than arable crops. Also the farmer doesn't need to do much either, nor worry about droughts or rains ruining their crop, because the sun comes up every day for the solar. Some farms also have animals grazing amongst the solar panels. Or maybe you'd prefer arable crops to be grown, you know wheat, barley etc the stuff you don't eat![]()
(Update on weird diet, MIL now on it, big changes)
Dave!
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Yes. Good idea. Until the EU banned the pesticides that made many of the alternate crops viable. Cabbage stem flea beetle decimated OSR anyone?Gavster wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 5:01 pm
But then again, it also makes sense to develop mixed farming methods so they don't rely on one single crop either.

ETA: Sorry I keep negatively commenting on your posts Gav - don't take it personally!

P.S. if you want a collab with Wren I went to school with the son of the owner... I haven't been in touch with him for many years but could point you in the right direction to bypass their marketing department

- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Clearly not a pittance! Although I do wonder how many are on inherited land because the inheritees cbaMito Man wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 5:29 pm Is the rent a pittance? I'd imagine just chucking wild flower seeds and entering the stewardship scheme would be better and you won't end up with land which will not be tied up forever more and looking out to an eyesore.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Harry Metcalfe’s latest farm video on YouTube mentions the protests being arranged about farm APR/IHT. I wonder if Jist Stop Oil will piggyback on this because they can get a publicity benefit from any disruption without it being imprisoned, presumably.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
The latest farmer to vocally come out against the change makes £4mil a year on Youtube.
Not dodging the allegations that it’s just a bunch of rich folk avoiding tax
.
Not dodging the allegations that it’s just a bunch of rich folk avoiding tax

An absolute unit
- Gavster
- Posts: 3873
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
- Currently Driving: A washing machine with heated seats
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I don't take it personally, it's all good to have contrary opinionsGG. wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 7:27 pmYes. Good idea. Until the EU banned the pesticides that made many of the alternate crops viable. Cabbage stem flea beetle decimated OSR anyone?Gavster wrote: Fri Nov 08, 2024 5:01 pm
But then again, it also makes sense to develop mixed farming methods so they don't rely on one single crop either.
ETA: Sorry I keep negatively commenting on your posts Gav - don't take it personally!
P.S. if you want a collab with Wren I went to school with the son of the owner... I haven't been in touch with him for many years but could point you in the right direction to bypass their marketing department![]()

Re: Bye bye Starmer
This'll confuse the light of thinking.
https://newsthump.com/2024/11/19/man-wh ... 0000-back/
"Man who spent years insisting we should ‘send em back’ left discombobulated after learning Labour has already ‘sent 10,000 back’"
https://newsthump.com/2024/11/19/man-wh ... 0000-back/
"Man who spent years insisting we should ‘send em back’ left discombobulated after learning Labour has already ‘sent 10,000 back’"
Re: Bye bye Starmer
You know newsthump isn't a real news site yeah?
YEAH?
YEAH?
The artist formerly known as _Who_
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Simon Williams, Media Analyst tells me it's a more trustworthy a source than GB News!