Bye bye Starmer
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Question for you.
If you were to contract cancer personally, without private health insurance, and of any description - would you want treatment in the UK or Japan?
Probably the easiest question you'll ever have to answer.
If you were to contract cancer personally, without private health insurance, and of any description - would you want treatment in the UK or Japan?
Probably the easiest question you'll ever have to answer.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I haven’t got a clue.
Survival rates for cancer are pretty good here aren’t they?
Survival rates for cancer are pretty good here aren’t they?
An absolute unit
- Explosive Newt
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Our healthcare service is poor compared to a lot of countries you would think we would be better than e.g. Poland. Japan has a universal healthcare insurance policy so is perhaps hard to compare directly.
Part of our issue (as Darzi has highlighted) is that we spend money in the wrong places.
We cut preventative medicine and community services to try and save money.
But this created extra demand in hospital services. The solution has been to expand hospital services to try and address this demand, which is actually more expensive than providing the services in primary care or preventing their need entirely.
Part of our issue (as Darzi has highlighted) is that we spend money in the wrong places.
We cut preventative medicine and community services to try and save money.
But this created extra demand in hospital services. The solution has been to expand hospital services to try and address this demand, which is actually more expensive than providing the services in primary care or preventing their need entirely.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Much like Japan and Spain, it seems to depend on the type of cancer.
I wonder if public visibility campaigns help, ball and prostate cancer have had a lot of attention.
https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resour ... 0diagnosed.
I wonder if public visibility campaigns help, ball and prostate cancer have had a lot of attention.
https://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/resour ... 0diagnosed.
An absolute unit
- Explosive Newt
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I would also caution against comparing us directly to different countries. E.g. Japanese have different genetics, diet and attitudes to health than us in the UK. So their baseline cancer risk is different, which will affect their survival. E.g. classically they eat more smoked food which places them at higher risk of bladder cancer.ZedLeg wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:14 pm Much like Japan and Spain, it seems to depend on the type of cancer.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
@ZedLeg
https://www.macmillan.org.uk/healthcare ... des-behind
We're 25 years behind mate. We have to deal with it - it isn't a good system and we shouldn't defend it as not facing up to the problems is a hindrence in dealing with them. The first step towards solving a problem is acknowledging there is one. Not smacking pans about in the street and writing we love the NHS on zebra crossings.
You have to draw a distinction between the hard work people do in the system and system itself.
https://www.macmillan.org.uk/healthcare ... des-behind
We're 25 years behind mate. We have to deal with it - it isn't a good system and we shouldn't defend it as not facing up to the problems is a hindrence in dealing with them. The first step towards solving a problem is acknowledging there is one. Not smacking pans about in the street and writing we love the NHS on zebra crossings.
You have to draw a distinction between the hard work people do in the system and system itself.
Last edited by GG. on Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I think they're nuances, that whilst valid, don't alter the overall picture regarding treatment standards.Explosive Newt wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:18 pmI would also caution against comparing us directly to different countries. E.g. Japanese have different genetics, diet and attitudes to health than us in the UK. So their baseline cancer risk is different, which will affect their survival. E.g. classically they eat more smoked food which places them at higher risk of bladder cancer.ZedLeg wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:14 pm Much like Japan and Spain, it seems to depend on the type of cancer.
Other European countries are also much more comparable re diet and genetics and we still fare worse.
Getting through the door via a GP is a massive problem. The GP service is not fit for purpose and needs really radical overhaul.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
That was my point earlier. From my (a layman’s) pov, it seems really hard to accurately gauge outcomes in healthcare due to the number of variables involved.Explosive Newt wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:18 pmI would also caution against comparing us directly to different countries. E.g. Japanese have different genetics, diet and attitudes to health than us in the UK. So their baseline cancer risk is different, which will affect their survival. E.g. classically they eat more smoked food which places them at higher risk of bladder cancer.ZedLeg wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:14 pm Much like Japan and Spain, it seems to depend on the type of cancer.
An absolute unit
- Explosive Newt
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I would agree with all those points. See above on our error on where we allocate resources currently.GG. wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:20 pmI think they're nuances, that whilst valid, don't alter the overall picture regarding treatment standards.Explosive Newt wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:18 pmI would also caution against comparing us directly to different countries. E.g. Japanese have different genetics, diet and attitudes to health than us in the UK. So their baseline cancer risk is different, which will affect their survival. E.g. classically they eat more smoked food which places them at higher risk of bladder cancer.ZedLeg wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:14 pm Much like Japan and Spain, it seems to depend on the type of cancer.
Other European countries are also much more comparable re diet and genetics and we still fare worse.
Getting through the door via a GP is a massive problem. The GP service is not fit for purpose and needs really radical overhaul.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I agree with this, it also ties into what Newt was saying about lack of funding for community care etc.GG. wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:20 pm genet
Getting through the door via a GP is a massive problem. The GP service is not fit for purpose and needs really radical overhaul.
An absolute unit
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I am, my partner and I both have mental health problems. We’re very aware of how shit services are.GG. wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:18 pm @ZedLeg
https://www.macmillan.org.uk/healthcare ... des-behind
We're 25 years behind mate. We have to deal with it - it isn't a good system and we shouldn't defend it as not facing up to the problems is a hindrence in dealing with them. The first step towards solving a problem is acknowledging there is one. Not smacking pans about in the street and writing we love the NHS on zebra crossings.
You have to draw a distinction between the hard work people do in the system and system itself.
It is purely a case of needing more money spent on it though. We shouldn’t be farming primary mental health care to charities.
An absolute unit
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Not spent if by that you mean more money in. Reallocated from what is already there and is being misused.ZedLeg wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:26 pmI am, my partner and I both have mental health problems. We’re very aware of how shit services are.GG. wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:18 pm @ZedLeg
https://www.macmillan.org.uk/healthcare ... des-behind
We're 25 years behind mate. We have to deal with it - it isn't a good system and we shouldn't defend it as not facing up to the problems is a hindrence in dealing with them. The first step towards solving a problem is acknowledging there is one. Not smacking pans about in the street and writing we love the NHS on zebra crossings.
You have to draw a distinction between the hard work people do in the system and system itself.
It is purely a case of needing more money spent on it though. We shouldn’t be farming primary mental health care to charities.
- Explosive Newt
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
I am sorry to hear that. MH is the prime example of how cutting a community service has cost us far more in the long run. Lack of community MH nurses means people wind up in crisis and land up in places where a) they can't be treated effectively and b) cost the taxpayer much more money (A&E and police cells).ZedLeg wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:26 pm I am, my partner and I both have mental health problems. We’re very aware of how shit services are.
- Explosive Newt
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
This is going to be hard though. If you expand primary care (and prevention) there is going to be a lag while the demand in secondary care diminishes.GG. wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:28 pmNot spent if by that you mean more money in. Reallocated from what is already there and is being misused.ZedLeg wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:26 pmI am, my partner and I both have mental health problems. We’re very aware of how shit services are.GG. wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:18 pm @ZedLeg
https://www.macmillan.org.uk/healthcare ... des-behind
We're 25 years behind mate. We have to deal with it - it isn't a good system and we shouldn't defend it as not facing up to the problems is a hindrence in dealing with them. The first step towards solving a problem is acknowledging there is one. Not smacking pans about in the street and writing we love the NHS on zebra crossings.
You have to draw a distinction between the hard work people do in the system and system itself.
It is purely a case of needing more money spent on it though. We shouldn’t be farming primary mental health care to charities.
Also it's the NHS so it's bascally impossible to fire people...
I suspect the only way for it to work is to repurpose a lot of people in secondary care to provide services in primary care. With better tech you can probably direct people towards telemedicine consults with secondary care clinicians rather than going via the GP but that is removing the role of GP as gatekeeper which is fundamental to the design of the NHS.
Last edited by Explosive Newt on Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Speaking from personal experience I think the GP system we have here is utterly shit and I think that's where most of the problems start in terms of late diagnosis. In between getting a GP appointment, then getting a physical appointment for a GP to actually see you, then usually its a blood test, getting misdiagnosed, then a referral, and so on and so forth it can easily be 6 months.
Also don't know why the quality of care at hospitals varies so much. I was told if I get sepsis in Kent do not go to a particular hospital named after an old physician, just find someone to drive me to London...
Also don't know why the quality of care at hospitals varies so much. I was told if I get sepsis in Kent do not go to a particular hospital named after an old physician, just find someone to drive me to London...
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Drug enforcement also a big factor if we're talking about mental health. De-criminalise skunk and wow, what a surpise, lots more paranoid schizophrenics to deal with. Funny that.
- Explosive Newt
- Posts: 1905
- Joined: Sat Feb 23, 2019 7:33 pm
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Often large teaching hospital vs small district general. The large teaching hospital will have far greater resource.Mito Man wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:33 pm Speaking from personal experience I think the GP system we have here is utterly shit and I think that's where most of the problems start in terms of late diagnosis. In between getting a GP appointment, then getting a physical appointment for a GP to actually see you, then usually its a blood test, getting misdiagnosed, then a referral, and so on and so forth it can easily be 6 months.
Also don't know why the quality of care at hospitals varies so much. I was told if I get sepsis in Kent do not go to a particular hospital named after an old physician, just find someone to drive me to London...
Also some hospitals / clinical departments are very badly managed and dysfunctional.
-
- Posts: 3552
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
- Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e - Contact:
Re: Bye bye Starmer
We have a digital gp service (with Axa maybe?) and it’s very good.. problem allocated to the right person and funding authorised if you want to get seen quicker (ie privately).
Just back from Boston MA, and there’s a small shop there called Forward, think it’s an automated human MOT centre..
https://goforward.com/carepod
Preventative medicine and treatment is a no brainer, like servicing your car before something actually fails, saving us and gov money plus it’s less messy when you don’t end up dumping a load of fluids below your chassis
Just back from Boston MA, and there’s a small shop there called Forward, think it’s an automated human MOT centre..
https://goforward.com/carepod
Preventative medicine and treatment is a no brainer, like servicing your car before something actually fails, saving us and gov money plus it’s less messy when you don’t end up dumping a load of fluids below your chassis
Cheers,
Ian
Ian
Re: Bye bye Starmer
Even that isn’t cut and dry though, there’s strong evidence that cannabis and some other currently illegal drugs can help with personality disorders when used properly.GG. wrote: Thu Sep 12, 2024 5:33 pm Drug enforcement also a big factor if we're talking about mental health. De-criminalise skunk and wow, what a surpise, lots more paranoid schizophrenics to deal with. Funny that.
An absolute unit