Harry’s Garage

User avatar
PaulJ
Posts: 688
Joined: Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:26 pm
Currently Driving: Cayman GTS 4.0

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by PaulJ »

I ruled the Emira out as soon as I learned it was 120mm wider than my Cayman. :(
User avatar
240PP
Posts: 1864
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:27 am
Currently Driving: A5 3.0 TDI, 987 S.

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by 240PP »

I’d still have an Emira. Domestic/parking situation dependent, maybe in a year or two.

V6, haven’t decided on colour/trim or manuel/auto.
User avatar
Matty
Posts: 2939
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:50 pm
Currently Driving: Up! GTi, Alfa Giulia QV

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Matty »

Jobbo wrote: Wed Jun 26, 2024 6:42 am
Rich B wrote: Tue Jun 25, 2024 11:51 pm I still want an Emira - it does look good as an every day driver.
And I think they have achieved their aim of Porschifying it by making it usable as one.

Not sure why there seems to be such a wave of negativity about the Emira online. Not here particularly but there are some odd criticisms in the PH thread.
I get the impression it's because the Evora had it's niche; 2+2 with a bit of rawness/basic-ness that kinda sat in the gap between the raw Elise and the refined Cayman, and was far cheaper than 911 which also had 2+2.

Now it's just a Lotus Cayman, without the same build quality.

So all the Lotus nerds are moaning about how they're sticking with the Evora, and the everyman is still buying Cayman. Meanwhile people like me are sitting here waiting for the prices to drop a bit more.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12061
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Jobbo »

Nobody is being really effusive about the Emira (other than its looks, and you don't need a review to tell you it looks amazing). But Lotus have given them to Youtubers rather than traditional media - Autocar hasn't had one to do a full road test for instance - so it's not really promoting the Emira very well. In contrast, listening to Porter on Smith & Sniff this week waxing lyrical about the Boxster GTS 4.0 got me thinking that would be a better buy. Bit disappointed to hear that the 992T didn't ride as well; the 992 does come with PASM as standard.
User avatar
Ascender
Posts: 4322
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:07 pm
Location: Proper Up North
Currently Driving: Polaris ATV, Hilux, Navara, Dakar, M3 Touring

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Ascender »

New video up and its the 718 Spyder RS…. 4 litre engine revving to 9000 8-)

Are these available for anyone to buy or are they one of those which will be sold out already and be flipped before you know it?

Cheers,

Mike.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12061
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Jobbo »

I think you know the answer to that Mike.

But… the 4.0 GTS has the same basic engine and a roof which actually works. The Spyder roof is stupid.
User avatar
Ascender
Posts: 4322
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 12:07 pm
Location: Proper Up North
Currently Driving: Polaris ATV, Hilux, Navara, Dakar, M3 Touring

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Ascender »

Jobbo wrote: Sun Jun 30, 2024 9:16 pm I think you know the answer to that Mike.

But… the 4.0 GTS has the same basic engine and a roof which actually works. The Spyder roof is stupid.
Oh of course it is, especially in the UK!

I’ve totally lost track of Porsche models, so genuinely didn’t know if this was one of those halo models which will never be available to buy.
Cheers,

Mike.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12061
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Jobbo »

I think Harry was a bit ambiguous - he said at the start that you can’t buy it but at the end said it wasn’t limited. I didn’t think you could buy one but maybe you could - if lucky - get an order slot?
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 7908
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by ZedLeg »

The Spyder is definitely my favourite RS model. I even thought it looked good, because I’m a chav :lol:
An absolute unit
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14560
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by mik »

Jobbo wrote: Sun Jun 30, 2024 9:16 pm But… the 4.0 GTS has the same basic engine and a roof which actually works. The Spyder roof is stupid.
All of that. The 4.0 is hugely attractive. That roof is just ridiculous.
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11479
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Rich B »

I haven't watched the video yet, but is the spider hugely lighter than a normal boxster? Unless it's 200kg lighter I'm not sure I see the point of the compromise.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14560
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by mik »

Rich B wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:02 am I haven't watched the video yet, but is the spider hugely lighter than a normal boxster? Unless it's 200kg lighter I'm not sure I see the point of the compromise.
Spyder is a smidgeypoo over 1400kg. Harry mentions that with the optional magnesium wheels and carbon brakes you might get it to dip below 1400....
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11479
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Rich B »

mik wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:03 am
Rich B wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:02 am I haven't watched the video yet, but is the spider hugely lighter than a normal boxster? Unless it's 200kg lighter I'm not sure I see the point of the compromise.
Spyder is a smidgeypoo over 1400kg. Harry mentions that with the optional magnesium wheels and carbon brakes you might get it to dip below 1400....
and how much would the equivalent boxster be?
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 8052
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Beany »

A quick google suggest a smidgeypoo over 1400kg....
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14560
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by mik »

Rich B wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:07 am
mik wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:03 am
Rich B wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:02 am I haven't watched the video yet, but is the spider hugely lighter than a normal boxster? Unless it's 200kg lighter I'm not sure I see the point of the compromise.
Spyder is a smidgeypoo over 1400kg. Harry mentions that with the optional magnesium wheels and carbon brakes you might get it to dip below 1400....
and how much would the equivalent boxster be?
About £78k before options AFAIK ;)
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11479
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Rich B »

mik wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:13 am
Rich B wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:07 am
mik wrote: Mon Jul 01, 2024 10:03 am
Spyder is a smidgeypoo over 1400kg. Harry mentions that with the optional magnesium wheels and carbon brakes you might get it to dip below 1400....
and how much would the equivalent boxster be?
About £78k before options AFAIK ;)
hmmm that is quite difference...
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 12061
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: Gentle hands

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Jobbo »

Probably about £1000/kg difference. Take a bigger shit.

Edit: £2000/kg in fact. 1435kg plays 1410kg.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14560
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by mik »

Spyder does have rather more powers than the 4.0 GTS though, so we need a £/kg/bhp metric that also factors in the time to erect the roof.
User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 5424
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by integrale_evo »

0-100-0 including erecting the roof at the start and dropping it again at the end :lol:
Cheers, Harry
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11479
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: Harry’s Garage

Post by Rich B »

For 25kg difference, I really can't see the point in all the hassle of the spyder roof.
Post Reply