Yeah, it's clearly impossible, let's not bother. I'm sure we can spend our way out of this mess.ZedLeg wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 10:58 am How do you make a clear plan to completely change an org as big as the NHS![]()

Yeah, it's clearly impossible, let's not bother. I'm sure we can spend our way out of this mess.ZedLeg wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 10:58 am How do you make a clear plan to completely change an org as big as the NHS![]()
a pub?! They're all closed and the land sold for flats round here!Beany wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 10:51 amWhich is exactly what austerity didn't do.Rich B wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 10:43 am imagine the process to fix these a million and one issues would involve spending more money and time on investigating and fixing them though. Do we carry on cutting public services in the meantime?
The reality is, we need to fix these issues, but that can only happen if there's resource allocated to do so, and that can't be at the expense of other services.
Can't imagine why our roads look like the surface of the moon and the local library has been closed, sold off and turned into a pub...
My point was that if there is a plan it'll be so complex as to be incomprehensible to the layman.
It's even better than that, when they say tax cuts for all they mean the people they like (old and/or rich). Their current tax plans don't help the people who need it most at all.Rich B wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:01 ama pub?! They're all closed and the land sold for flats round here!Beany wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 10:51 amWhich is exactly what austerity didn't do.Rich B wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 10:43 am imagine the process to fix these a million and one issues would involve spending more money and time on investigating and fixing them though. Do we carry on cutting public services in the meantime?
The reality is, we need to fix these issues, but that can only happen if there's resource allocated to do so, and that can't be at the expense of other services.
Can't imagine why our roads look like the surface of the moon and the local library has been closed, sold off and turned into a pub...
I'm still perplexed by the Tories openly saying in interviews that they want to reduce people's taxes, but obviously public services will have to be cut too. They're literally saying it as a good thing!
You know how you can't get a GP appointment any more and the rivers are full of sewage - they want to make that worse - but you'll pay less tax! Yay!
Take off, nuke it from orbit, it's the only way to be sure.
See all public sector Dave. The public sector survives largely due to the hardworking at the coal face and the very basic tenet of not being able to collapse.V8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:18 am Sir John Rose sent an email out to all Rolls-Royce employees once and it said.
Rolls-Royce is an engineering company that produces anything from a screw, to a jet engine to a ship. It is a company of engineers and for that reason they will not be put into the redundancy pool.
So managers who had managers who had managers went into the pool and in 18 months the company were hugely profitable and making more parts and assemblies than ever.
Mr Langley did the same with Bergen Engines. They removed non front line staff who weren’t essential.
I’d be amazed if the NHS isn’t full of self serving job creating jobs which just slow everything down and create waste.
Dave!
Efficiency consultants can fuck off. I’ve seen it twice where people who know nothing about the business came in, had great ideas, got paid loads, nothing worked and then they left. Once in Bergen and once at the Crosley works in Manchester.ZedLeg wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:05 amMy point was that if there is a plan it'll be so complex as to be incomprehensible to the layman.
It'll also come with it's own significant costs for efficiency consultants etc![]()
Without significant cross-party agreement to commit to long term delivery of reform it won't ever happen. And cross-party working on major issues or infrastructure projects no longer seems possible.
Thats kind of the issue - Rolls Royce employs 22k people over 7 sites - that's a number one person could broadly understand all the roles of given some time.V8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:18 am Sir John Rose sent an email out to all Rolls-Royce employees once and it said.
Rolls-Royce is an engineering company that produces anything from a screw, to a jet engine to a ship. It is a company of engineers and for that reason they will not be put into the redundancy pool.
So managers who had managers who had managers went into the pool and in 18 months the company were hugely profitable and making more parts and assemblies than ever.
Mr Langley did the same with Bergen Engines. They removed non front line staff who weren’t essential.
I’d be amazed if the NHS isn’t full of self serving job creating jobs which just slow everything down and create waste.
Dave!
So that’s 1000 times the savings for each change, the person who puts the orders into the form and delivers it to the person who approves the form to be sent to the person who deals with outside contractors.Rich B wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:27 amThats kind of the issue - Rolls Royce employs 22k people over 7 sites - that's a number one person could broadly understand all the roles of given some time.V8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:18 am Sir John Rose sent an email out to all Rolls-Royce employees once and it said.
Rolls-Royce is an engineering company that produces anything from a screw, to a jet engine to a ship. It is a company of engineers and for that reason they will not be put into the redundancy pool.
So managers who had managers who had managers went into the pool and in 18 months the company were hugely profitable and making more parts and assemblies than ever.
Mr Langley did the same with Bergen Engines. They removed non front line staff who weren’t essential.
I’d be amazed if the NHS isn’t full of self serving job creating jobs which just slow everything down and create waste.
Dave!
the NHS employs 1.5million people and there's over a thousand hospitals alone!
Yes but the guy only got paid as it worked. He took a single payment which was from the savings, not from a pit that was already there, he (well 3 of them) created the money from nothing essentially to be able to be paid.ZedLeg wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:28 am They still spent money for that efficiency, it was just his fee and the costs for the changes he made.
I understand how you make efficiency savings in a business, I've done it before.
My point with the NHS is that you can sack thousands of people and cut services to the bone and it's not going to fix that the NHS has been underfunded by billions.
I imagine this process has been happening for a long time already - hell, if it hasn't been happening in the last 14 years then we have bigger issues!V8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:30 amSo that’s 1000 times the savings for each change, the person who puts the orders into the form and delivers it to the person who approves the form to be sent to the person who deals with outside contractors.Rich B wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:27 amThats kind of the issue - Rolls Royce employs 22k people over 7 sites - that's a number one person could broadly understand all the roles of given some time.V8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:18 am Sir John Rose sent an email out to all Rolls-Royce employees once and it said.
Rolls-Royce is an engineering company that produces anything from a screw, to a jet engine to a ship. It is a company of engineers and for that reason they will not be put into the redundancy pool.
So managers who had managers who had managers went into the pool and in 18 months the company were hugely profitable and making more parts and assemblies than ever.
Mr Langley did the same with Bergen Engines. They removed non front line staff who weren’t essential.
I’d be amazed if the NHS isn’t full of self serving job creating jobs which just slow everything down and create waste.
Dave!
the NHS employs 1.5million people and there's over a thousand hospitals alone!
It’s just a business at the end of the day. You shouldn’t have to look at the xxx billion that needs to be saved. You just start at each obvious bit of wastage and then keep going.
How long would it take, 10 years or more, less, who cares, Aslong as wastage isn’t tolerated a long way before it hits people doing the fixing and cutting and sewing.
Dave!
He didn't create money from nothing, he saw savings that others missed. It's not magic.V8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:32 amYes but the guy only got paid as it worked. He took a single payment which was from the savings, not from a pit that was already there, he (well 3 of them) created the money from nothing essentially to be able to be paid.ZedLeg wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:28 am They still spent money for that efficiency, it was just his fee and the costs for the changes he made.
I understand how you make efficiency savings in a business, I've done it before.
My point with the NHS is that you can sack thousands of people and cut services to the bone and it's not going to fix that the NHS has been underfunded by billions.
Dave!
He was paid from a pot of money that before him was not there. It wasn’t available as it was being spent unwisely on waste.ZedLeg wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:34 amHe didn't create money from nothing, he saw savings that others missed. It's not magic.V8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:32 amYes but the guy only got paid as it worked. He took a single payment which was from the savings, not from a pit that was already there, he (well 3 of them) created the money from nothing essentially to be able to be paid.ZedLeg wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:28 am They still spent money for that efficiency, it was just his fee and the costs for the changes he made.
I understand how you make efficiency savings in a business, I've done it before.
My point with the NHS is that you can sack thousands of people and cut services to the bone and it's not going to fix that the NHS has been underfunded by billions.
Dave!
It's semantics but I disagree, the money was there he just freed it up for his pocketV8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:42 amHe was paid from a pot of money that before him was not there. It wasn’t available as it was being spent unwisely on waste.ZedLeg wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:34 amHe didn't create money from nothing, he saw savings that others missed. It's not magic.V8Granite wrote: Tue Jun 04, 2024 11:32 am
Yes but the guy only got paid as it worked. He took a single payment which was from the savings, not from a pit that was already there, he (well 3 of them) created the money from nothing essentially to be able to be paid.
Dave!
If he made a £1 loaf of bread suddenly cost 90p, he created that extra money to be spent.
Dave!