Puzzle
Puzzle
I've started reading 'The Intelligence Trap' and it has this puzzle near the beginning, which is a little bit mind-bending. Curious how many of you clever lot can get it!
Jack is looking at Anne, but Anne is looking at George. Jack is married, but George is not. Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
Jack is looking at Anne, but Anne is looking at George. Jack is married, but George is not. Is a married person looking at an unmarried person?
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4815
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Puzzle
Spoiler
I can't see how that can be determined. We don't know Anne's marital status, and you can guess or assume all the things that we're not told, you don't know. I'm sure someone will shortly tell me why I'm wrong.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
-
- Posts: 2533
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
- Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e - Contact:
Re: Puzzle
J > A. If A is married then no, if not then yes.
But if A=not married, then above line is true and if A=yes married, then A>G proves the statement.
So yes
But if A=not married, then above line is true and if A=yes married, then A>G proves the statement.
So yes
Cheers,
Ian
Ian
Re: Puzzle
Balls - I zipped down the page to proclaim “YES” only to find that Ian beat me.
Anne is Married - then Yes - Anne is looking at George
Anne is not married - then yes - Jack is looking at Anne
Anne is Married - then Yes - Anne is looking at George
Anne is not married - then yes - Jack is looking at Anne
Last edited by mik on Mon May 13, 2024 9:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Puzzle
What Ian said though I don’t follow his symbols.
There are two possibilities: Anne is either married or unmarried.
If she is unmarried then Jack looking at her meets the criterion.
If she is married then her looking at George meets it.
So either way someone married is looking at someone unmarried, just not the same people.
There are two possibilities: Anne is either married or unmarried.
If she is unmarried then Jack looking at her meets the criterion.
If she is married then her looking at George meets it.
So either way someone married is looking at someone unmarried, just not the same people.
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4815
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Puzzle
My prediction held. I was told I'm wrong by multiple people!
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Puzzle
I got it wrong, I think I know why and wonder what the book has to say about it - sounds like I'll have to make a purchase. Still, fo' shame.
It's a good interesting topic, thanks for posting
It brings up a question up I'm looking for an answer for; how do I know if I'm stupid? (I know, you'll all tell me...). Maybe "how do I know how stupid I am?" is better wording, maybe not knowing how to phrase the question is a good clue
It's a good interesting topic, thanks for posting
It brings up a question up I'm looking for an answer for; how do I know if I'm stupid? (I know, you'll all tell me...). Maybe "how do I know how stupid I am?" is better wording, maybe not knowing how to phrase the question is a good clue
Re: Puzzle
@Jobbo explained it perfectly. Many people assume that because we cannot guess Anne's marriage status, we also cannot determine the answer to the question. If we step back from that assumption, we can realise there are only two states of marriage that Anne can exist in, and both of those states provide an answer to the question.
Many very intelligent people get it wrong because they have tunnel vision about their knowledge. That's what the book is about, how people who win nobel prizes can also end up promoting conspiracy theories - excelling in one very specific area of knowledge is also linked with being a bit stupid or naive in other areas. People who score higher on 'cognitive reflection' are better at interrogating their own assumptions and answering questions like this.
Many very intelligent people get it wrong because they have tunnel vision about their knowledge. That's what the book is about, how people who win nobel prizes can also end up promoting conspiracy theories - excelling in one very specific area of knowledge is also linked with being a bit stupid or naive in other areas. People who score higher on 'cognitive reflection' are better at interrogating their own assumptions and answering questions like this.
Re: Puzzle
Sounds like the old jack of all trades master of none chestnut.
How about not having a sig at all?
Re: Puzzle
ime people who are unusually expert in a very specific thing are prone to dunning kruger.
An absolute unit
Re: Puzzle
I found myself in a meeting having a similar quandary to this. The other people didn't get there could be multiple answers to the same question based on a condition (well actually ibfurthe complicated things by adding a third variable in the equation) further back in the problem that I didn't have the current answer to. Answering them with a 'depends on', I might as well have been.speaking in tongues.
Re: Puzzle
Apply this to politics and you can see where it all goes wrong. I suppose the cabinet ministers all have their advisors who are hopefully experts in their field but then the actual ministers who have the last say get swapped around all too often into different positions and then stupid things start happening.
How about not having a sig at all?