IanF wrote: Wed Sep 20, 2023 11:34 pm
Gavster wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2023 10:45 am
GG. wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2023 10:35 am
Cautionary tale really as they'll lose their home and a good lesson in not buying a period property if you can't afford/are not willing to maintain it. Sorry you've had to go through all this grief but it may all come good for you in the end.
Him and his first wife are the original leasholders on that unit from when the building was converted, their lease is dated 12th January 1972 - he's simply allowed the property fall deeper and deeper into disrepair over the last 50 years.
I hope the result goes your way Gav, but I can't help feeling sorry for the other party; there's no rational reason for their obscurification.
I suggest you wear your biohazard suit (and GoPro) when you eventually gain access.. obviously take a loaf with you to compare against one kept in your sanitary abode.
They are the masters of prevarication, however that doesn't change their legal responsibilities and courts are already beginning to tire of their obfuscations.
Later today I'm going to serve a section 146 notice on them in person, which gives them another 14 days to allow full unfettered access and pay the most recent costs order (plus a bit extra for the s.146 costs). I've got the hard copies on my desk ready to go, plus a roll of tape and a plastic envelope to tape it to their front door in case they have decided to block their letterbox.