No F1 thread?

User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5536
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by duncs500 »

tim wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 7:45 am There's no shadow over this year, he dominated and is a worthy champion. It's a bit of a shame there was no over-the-lime razzamatazz about it, but I doubt he cares that much. Too busy banging Kelly Piquet and counting his money I imagine. C*nt. lol
The point is, if they spent more money on in season development last year, then how much of the work has benefited this season's car? Without that rule breach would they have been as dominant this season?

I agree he is a worthy champion, and it certainly isn't his fault, but it is still an issue. If I were the FIA, I would leave the 2022 WDC with MV, but disqualify RB from 2022 WCC. I think that's the only way the FIA come out of this with any integrity.

Won't happen of course, but it's what should happen IMO.
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5536
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by duncs500 »

Swervin_Mervin wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 10:43 am Oh and I've come to the conclusion that Le Clerc is actually not that great. He's quick, yes, but he buckles under pressure (has made umpteen mistakes this season, which you don't need when your team are highly likely to hobble a great chance) and he just lacks that ruthlessness that makes for a future WDC prospect.

If Merc can up their game than I genuinely think that Russell will be more likely to challenge Verstapppen over the next few years. Or, as an outside chance, Lando if McLaren can get themselves up there.
Don't rate Lando as highly as you, but generally agree that CL has had a poor season really. I'm not ready to write him off just yet, but he really needs a stellar season in 2023 to get back on track.
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 977
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by MikeHunt »

So Red bull did break the rules but as it was only a minor breach of less than £6m there will be a minor punishment.

Even the timing of it feels contrived and predictable.
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11482
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Rich B »

The sensible response would be to dock their budget next year by that sum.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5507
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

"This means the team exceeded the cap by less than 5%, or $7.25m. Both Red Bull and Aston Martin were found guilty of a procedural breach of the cap."

"A procedural breach is not an overspend, but rather a failure to fill in forms correctly."

Err, wot? :lol:

Do you mean Man Maths? Evonomics?
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 12085
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Mito Man »

At least Red Bull actually produced a decent car as a result of it. Can’t imagine Stroll will be happy, cheating and still going backwards 😂
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14562
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by mik »

Rich B wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 4:27 pm The sensible response would be to dock their budget next year by that sum.
That.
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 977
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by MikeHunt »

User avatar
JonMad
Posts: 2976
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 9:25 pm
Currently Driving: 2015 Swift; 2012 Yeti; 2006 Fabia

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by JonMad »

Swervin_Mervin wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 4:28 pm "This means the team exceeded the cap by less than 5%, or $7.25m. Both Red Bull and Aston Martin were found guilty of a procedural breach of the cap."

"A procedural breach is not an overspend, but rather a failure to fill in forms correctly."

Err, wot? :lol:

Do you mean Man Maths? Evonomics?
>> Aston Martin are in 'Procedural Breach'.
>> Red Bull have committed a Procedural Breach and a Minor Financial Overspend (less than 5% of the Cost Cap), according to the FIA.

I expect a $500k fine and no sporting penalty for last, this or next year's seasons.
Left over crest; tightens.
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 977
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by MikeHunt »

JonMad wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 5:17 pm
>> Aston Martin are in 'Procedural Breach'.
>> Red Bull have committed a Procedural Breach and a Minor Financial Overspend (less than 5% of the Cost Cap), according to the FIA.

I expect a $500k fine and no sporting penalty for last, this or next year's seasons.
The FIA don't seem to be firing on all cylinders right now so its difficult to predict.

Isn't a fine the least suitable punishment for breaking a cost cap?
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11482
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Rich B »

A fine for the amount they breached the budget by, payable out of next years budget. Job done.
User avatar
duncs500
Posts: 5536
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:59 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by duncs500 »

If it's a $500k dollar fine and that's the precedent, if I'm the likes of Toto I'm thinking I now allow for $7.75m and increase my development budget by $7.25m. Makes a mockery of the whole thing really, but if them's the new rules then so be it.
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 5507
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

duncs500 wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 6:55 pm If it's a $500k dollar fine and that's the precedent, if I'm the likes of Toto I'm thinking I now allow for $7.75m and increase my development budget by $7.25m. Makes a mockery of the whole thing really, but if them's the new rules then so be it.
Hopefully!
User avatar
Marv
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:33 pm
Contact:

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Marv »

Rich B wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 5:26 pm A fine for the amount they breached the budget by, payable out of next years budget. Job done.
They might still count the £15m expenditure as worth it, as from what I understand they gain an advantage for about three seasons by over spending on one.
Oui, je suis un motard.
User avatar
mik
Posts: 14562
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by mik »

duncs500 wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 6:55 pm If it's a $500k dollar fine and that's the precedent, if I'm the likes of Toto I'm thinking I now allow for $7.75m and increase my development budget by $7.25m. Makes a mockery of the whole thing really, but if them's the new rules then so be it.
It’s stoopid.
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 5896
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by DeskJockey »

I liked the suggestion on The Race (on YouTube). Restrict their wind tunnel time by 10 or 20%. That's likely to have a much bigger impact.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 11482
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: T6.1 VW Transporter combi
S1 Lotus Elise

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Rich B »

Marv wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:31 pm
Rich B wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 5:26 pm A fine for the amount they breached the budget by, payable out of next years budget. Job done.
They might still count the £15m expenditure as worth it, as from what I understand they gain an advantage for about three seasons by over spending on one.
£15m would be a major breach and as they say - penalties could involve removing championships.
User avatar
Jimmy Choo
Posts: 2311
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:43 am

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Jimmy Choo »

A fine just means you can buy a championship, even if the fine is $100m, like McLaren got for spygate. The timing and delays of the FIA announcement just stink of political shenanigans and I don't like that.

However, I'm willing to swap all the potential fines, restrictions and penalties for Marko and Horner to get kicked in the balls by every other team principal as long as it's televised.
Banal Vapid Platitudes
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 5130
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by jamcg »

Jimmy Choo wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:31 pm A fine just means you can buy a championship, even if the fine is $100m, like McLaren got for spygate. The timing and delays of the FIA announcement just stink of political shenanigans and I don't like that.

However, I'm willing to swap all the potential fines, restrictions and penalties for Marko and Horner to get kicked in the balls by every other team principal as long as it's televised.
Mclaren were also excluded from the 2007 constructors championship, so even when Lewis came second in the wdc with them they couldn’t score any constructors points, therefore no prize money

As for your suggestion, I’d happily pay to have a go. In my steel toe cap work boots. With a spike welded onto it
User avatar
Marv
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:33 pm
Contact:

Re: No F1 thread?

Post by Marv »

Rich B wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:46 pm
Marv wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:31 pm
Rich B wrote: Mon Oct 10, 2022 5:26 pm A fine for the amount they breached the budget by, payable out of next years budget. Job done.
They might still count the £15m expenditure as worth it, as from what I understand they gain an advantage for about three seasons by over spending on one.
£15m would be a major breach and as they say - penalties could involve removing championships.
Yeah, sorry to clarify I mean the ~£7.5m they may have over spent in the 2021 season (#speculation), plus the £7.5m fine they'd receive as a fine out of next years budget (if we we're to follow what you're proposing)
Oui, je suis un motard.
Post Reply