That one being such an early chassis number probably adds another chunk.
GG., that's not a swb, how much does that affect the price?
Likely significantly more for a very early SWB so maybe calling it the 400k version of a 100k car is unfair but to me it’s somewhat perverse to take a SWB, where a chunk of the value is in the originality of having an early car that is the ‘Ur 911’ to then modify it to make it a ‘better’ car… as Porsche themselves did several years later. Why not just start with a LWB for less or use a RHD as a base for the same amount? I know what I’d do.nuttinnew wrote: Mon Oct 11, 2021 10:37 pm I'd assumed it had been ground up restored and that's where a chunk of the £££ came from![]()
That one being such an early chassis number probably adds another chunk.
GG., that's not a swb, how much does that affect the price?
But isn’t the value add from these that they have been rebuilt to your spec? (Like the seat in the one Harry had a stab at). You never get that money back but you convince yourself it’s worth it…GG. wrote: Mon Oct 11, 2021 11:14 pm Yes, getting to the core of it, that’s basically what they’ve done with that Sports Purpose one - there is only one reason they used a LHD donor as a base and that’s because it would be too expensive to get a very early RHD version and tweak it. So really it is a 400k version of a sub 100k car unmodified.
Then again I guess you could say that of an Eagle E type or any of their ilk. None are really good value for money or a sensible thing to do to a much cheaper car. You’d be much better off with a 2.7 RS as an investment — it’ll be interesting to see whether these high end modded cars retain their value in years to come or depreciate once the shine has worn off.
Were I in the position to spunk 400k on a car, I'd have no qualms whatsoever splashing 90k of it on that engine just for the sound alone. From memory Tuthill himself has said (on the Collecting Cars podcast?) that the 2ltr is by far the sweet spot revvy little buzzsaw bastard of an engine and would always be his choice and this 2.2 is just a subtle variation of that.integrale_evo wrote: Thu Oct 14, 2021 1:28 am Yeah, I can kind of see the appeal in a fully tailored to your requirements car, but can’t see the appeal of a secondhand one built especially for someone else at not much less money.
The Porsche is lovely, sound great and bet it’s brilliant fun to drive, but I’d still struggle at the total cost, and at £90k for a 200bhp 2.2l engine.

Rubber bumpers look wrong with those wheels - needs chrome. I suspect that's how it came from the factory mind you, but BL did some terrible things to Jag.

Proper fab skills on show there. Excellent stuff.RobYob wrote: Mon Oct 25, 2021 12:50 pm More rebuilding the Lancia, some enviable skills on display.
