DeskJockey wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 8:37 pm
Beany wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 8:29 pm
DeskJockey wrote: Fri Jun 25, 2021 6:27 pm
Irrespective of what the numpty has done, there's a bigger and far more interesting question, with potentially very significant ramifications, that needs answering: who has access to government building CCTV systems?
The least worst and probably most plausible option is that it was deliberately leaked from inside by someone who had been ordered to do so. Other options are significantly worse and could have far wider implications.
I'm thinking from previous convos you've worked in at least local/regional govt. I've worked in national govt and I've always assumed that all my trips down the corridors were monitored.
That's why I got off with game colleagues in the Comms room, not the corridors or the lifts, because in the comms room, I know there are no cameras. And strong air conditioning is a plus.
Hancock
has to be hung out to dry for this. He has to.
Hasn't he...?
There are cameras everywhere! But still, who has access to the networks?
Depends on the networks, doesn't it....
No gov shit on my standalone LAN back in the day as they didn't like unmonitored sftp uploads, which was kinda the point of an agile service like gov.UK, or direct.gov.uk back in the day..... Can't run something like that where a file upload takes three weeks to be approved
Christ, I used to run a major part of a national government network, what the fuck am I doing working for a podunk telecoms outfit in Leeds who's knowledge of employment law only stretches to such parts they can break with plausible deniability

I need to get a proper job....