Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Posted: Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:20 pm
It's been done before by Major. Cash for questions scandal.NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 1:17 pm The number of people gleefully supporting this action (not necessarily here, btw), simply because it delivers the thing they want, without thinking it through is staggering.
Could you imagine this happening on any other subject? Abolishing the NHS? Scrapping pensions? Banning abortion? Introducing a night curfew? Annexing Eire? It’s a genuine slippery slope. If they can do this now, then we have no democratic control whatsoever.
Doesn't make it right though.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:27 pmIt's been done before by Major. Cash for questions scandal.NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 1:17 pm The number of people gleefully supporting this action (not necessarily here, btw), simply because it delivers the thing they want, without thinking it through is staggering.
Could you imagine this happening on any other subject? Abolishing the NHS? Scrapping pensions? Banning abortion? Introducing a night curfew? Annexing Eire? It’s a genuine slippery slope. If they can do this now, then we have no democratic control whatsoever.
I'm not saying it does. But it's a constitutional tool at the Government's disposal, that has been used before (for questionable reasons by a staunch Remainer ironically enough).DeskJockey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:28 pmDoesn't make it right though.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:27 pmIt's been done before by Major. Cash for questions scandal.NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 1:17 pm The number of people gleefully supporting this action (not necessarily here, btw), simply because it delivers the thing they want, without thinking it through is staggering.
Could you imagine this happening on any other subject? Abolishing the NHS? Scrapping pensions? Banning abortion? Introducing a night curfew? Annexing Eire? It’s a genuine slippery slope. If they can do this now, then we have no democratic control whatsoever.
I know that's not what you said, just pointing it out.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:32 pmI'm not saying it does. But it's a constitutional tool at the Government's disposal, that has been used before (for questionable reasons by a staunch Remainer ironically enough).DeskJockey wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:28 pmDoesn't make it right though.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:27 pm
It's been done before by Major. Cash for questions scandal.
How long did Major do that for out of interest?Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:27 pmIt's been done before by Major. Cash for questions scandal.NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 1:17 pm The number of people gleefully supporting this action (not necessarily here, btw), simply because it delivers the thing they want, without thinking it through is staggering.
Could you imagine this happening on any other subject? Abolishing the NHS? Scrapping pensions? Banning abortion? Introducing a night curfew? Annexing Eire? It’s a genuine slippery slope. If they can do this now, then we have no democratic control whatsoever.
Fuck that cunt.
Having had a dig about, 6 weeks it seems. From 21 March 1997 until the GE that year (1 May). Prorogued on a Friday when the Cash for Questions report was due on the following Mon/Tue.speedingfine wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:53 pmHow long did Major do that for out of interest?Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:27 pmIt's been done before by Major. Cash for questions scandal.NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 1:17 pm The number of people gleefully supporting this action (not necessarily here, btw), simply because it delivers the thing they want, without thinking it through is staggering.
Could you imagine this happening on any other subject? Abolishing the NHS? Scrapping pensions? Banning abortion? Introducing a night curfew? Annexing Eire? It’s a genuine slippery slope. If they can do this now, then we have no democratic control whatsoever.
That's not really a practical issue though. It hasn't actually been sitting throughout the summer recess, so it's not as if the MPs are tired out.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:26 pm ETA: I also didn't realise just how long this Parliamentary session had been sitting. Since 21 June 2017! Longest since 1653.
Viva la revolution.
No, really?!Jobbo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:30 pmThat's not really a practical issue though. It hasn't actually been sitting throughout the summer recess, so it's not as if the MPs are tired out.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:26 pm ETA: I also didn't realise just how long this Parliamentary session had been sitting. Since 21 June 2017! Longest since 1653.
Well what was your point? The length of a Parliamentary session isn't fixed, but the whole idea of Parliament having to be ended and start again is a nonsense except at elections.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:41 pmNo, really?!Jobbo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:30 pmThat's not really a practical issue though. It hasn't actually been sitting throughout the summer recess, so it's not as if the MPs are tired out.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:26 pm ETA: I also didn't realise just how long this Parliamentary session had been sitting. Since 21 June 2017! Longest since 1653.
Calling a general election is very, very different from what Johnson is doing here, even if still morally questionable, and the report was still published. Neil Hamilton lost his seat (and his credibility) and, of course, Labour ousted the Conservative government by a landslide.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 2:27 pmIt's been done before by Major. Cash for questions scandal.NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 1:17 pm The number of people gleefully supporting this action (not necessarily here, btw), simply because it delivers the thing they want, without thinking it through is staggering.
Could you imagine this happening on any other subject? Abolishing the NHS? Scrapping pensions? Banning abortion? Introducing a night curfew? Annexing Eire? It’s a genuine slippery slope. If they can do this now, then we have no democratic control whatsoever.
Name one occasion when the Europe Council or the European Commission has either a) prevented the European Parliament from sitting or b) dictated the agenda of the European Parliament.
No point as such, just a surprised observation.Jobbo wrote: ↑Wed Aug 28, 2019 3:42 pmWell what was your point? The length of a Parliamentary session isn't fixed, but the whole idea of Parliament having to be ended and start again is a nonsense except at elections.