OV9

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:30 pm**

Beany wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:14 pm It's almost like Broccers is talking right out of his arse.

Oh well, fairly standard then.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:31 pm**

JonMad wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:10 pm Significantly. (they're not my numbers to share, but they are significantly lower that 20k)

So 15000 10000 5000?

No commitment

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:32 pm**

nuttinnew wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:30 pm
JonMad wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:00 pm HAL's own site

Sorry, force of habit.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:32 pm**

Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:31 pm
JonMad wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:10 pm Significantly. (they're not my numbers to share, but they are significantly lower that 20k)
So 15000 10000 5000?

No commitment

Yeah, I'm sure they want to get a family member in the shit by dishing out confidential commercial info.

You melt.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:34 pm**

Beany wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:32 pm
Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:31 pm
JonMad wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:10 pm Significantly. (they're not my numbers to share, but they are significantly lower that 20k)
So 15000 10000 5000?

No commitment
Yeah, I'm sure they want to get a family member in the shit by dishing out confidential commercial info.

You melt.

Hehe I'm wrong apparently by how much is classified. You melt? What's that

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:43 pm**

You don't have a source for your number, so it's irrelevant.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:44 pm**

Rich B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:39 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:53 pm
Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:18 pm

Yet you agree business couldn't see this coming.
So the government failed to act on a report 4 years ago that predicted exactly where things would go wrong, but it’s not political? What would you call it?
have you seen the report from 2016? Post a link!

No, but some of those involved are more than happy to spill the beans:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... overnment/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... mic-three/

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:47 pm**

Beany wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:43 pm You don't have a source for your number, so it's irrelevant.

errrr Beany, A caller said it on LBC. You don’t get any more official than that.

I know it could have just been Doris the retired cleaner from Chigwell, but it’s FACT.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:48 pm**

NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:44 pm
Rich B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:39 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 3:53 pm

So the government failed to act on a report 4 years ago that predicted exactly where things would go wrong, but it’s not political? What would you call it?
have you seen the report from 2016? Post a link!
No, but some of those involved are more than happy to spill the beans:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... overnment/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... mic-three/

Why haven’t the Telegraph making a big deal about this for the last 4 years?!

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:00 pm**

Rich B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:48 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:44 pm
Rich B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 4:39 pm have you seen the report from 2016? Post a link!
No, but some of those involved are more than happy to spill the beans:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... overnment/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... mic-three/
Why haven’t the Telegraph making a big deal about this for the last 4 years?!

Yes, that’s right, it’s absolutely the fault of the media for the government failing to update its pandemic preparedness plans after testing proved the existing plans were inadequate. You’ve fucked nailed it, Rich

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:13 pm**

Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:31 pm
JonMad wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:10 pm Significantly. (they're not my numbers to share, but they are significantly lower that 20k)
So 15000 10000 5000?

No commitment

Our local news has just said the regions two main airports are running around 130 flights per week between them, down from 1300 odd on the week before lockdown.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:14 pm**

NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:00 pm
Rich B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:48 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:44 pm

No, but some of those involved are more than happy to spill the beans:

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... overnment/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/0 ... mic-three/
Why haven’t the Telegraph making a big deal about this for the last 4 years?!
Yes, that’s right, it’s absolutely the fault of the media for the government failing to update its pandemic preparedness plans after testing proved the existing plans were inadequate. You’ve fucked nailed it, Rich

That is exactly what I was leading to and this ends that conversation.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:22 pm**

Rich B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:14 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:00 pm
Rich B wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:48 pm Why haven’t the Telegraph making a big deal about this for the last 4 years?!
Yes, that’s right, it’s absolutely the fault of the media for the government failing to update its pandemic preparedness plans after testing proved the existing plans were inadequate. You’ve fucked nailed it, Rich
That is exactly what I was leading to and this ends that conversation.

Who knows, one day you may even make some kind of point.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:23 pm**

integrale_evo wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:13 pm
Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:31 pm
JonMad wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 5:10 pm Significantly. (they're not my numbers to share, but they are significantly lower that 20k)
So 15000 10000 5000?

No commitment
Our local news has just said the regions two main airports are running around 130 flights per week between them, down from 1300 odd on the week before lockdown.

Cheers. All still going on. The MSM news is terrible.

Lots of folks happy to go prove your position then running away.

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:30 pm**

I read something a few weeks ago saying that airlines were running empty flights because if they stopped flying all together they’d lose their spots at airports or something. Can’t be bothered to look it up.

Feel free to google it though broccers

Posted: **Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:42 pm**

ZedLeg wrote: ↑Tue Apr 21, 2020 6:30 pm I read something a few weeks ago saying that airlines were running empty flights because if they stopped flying all together they’d lose their spots at airports or something. Can’t be bothered to look it up.

Feel free to google it though broccers

You might be right.

One day.... one day you'll back up a post of mine. Let's see.

Posted: **Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:09 am**

Remember when they said this wouldn’t happen?

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/p ... 48431.html

Posted: **Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:11 am**

Will it come via the NI border that wasn’t going to happen but now is?

Posted: **Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:13 am**

It’s almost like our bargaining position isn’t anywhere close to as strong as the gammons convinced themselves it was

Posted: **Fri Jun 05, 2020 10:14 am**

Who knew? Apart from everyone with a brain.

OV9

Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!

Re: Bye Bye Boris!