Bye Bye Boris!
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
It's not government investment in green energy that's got us to the point where the energy network isn't fit for purpose, it's the 40 years of prioritising profit over improvement. Same with public transport and telecomms.
An absolute unit
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
The government is supposed to secure the safety and security of the country, they failed to do that by letting us fall behind in our energy supplies.
Dave!
Dave!
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Offering grants for panels on every house and exisiting large buildings instead of putting them in fields that are better untilised for farming (and interfere with the natural heat cycles of the ground because they block the sun in vast areas) along with investment (Sodium Ion development) and grants for battery storage systems would be a start IMO. Manadating every new build must have a solar and battery system might be a good idea as well.Explosive Newt wrote: ↑Sun Sep 04, 2022 10:19 pm Rather than something sensible like, I dunno, get homes insulated, put out solar panels and grants to the most needy?
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
All of this. I read recently that in some EU countries (Belgium and Germany were mentioned) it's now also mandatory for any new-build to have a rainwater harvesting and storage system, with the minimum requirement being capacity to store 2500l.drcarlos wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 12:49 pmOffering grants for panels on every house and exisiting large buildings instead of putting them in fields that are better untilised for farming (and interfere with the natural heat cycles of the ground because they block the sun in vast areas) along with investment (Sodium Ion development) and grants for battery storage systems would be a start IMO. Manadating every new build must have a solar and battery system might be a good idea as well.Explosive Newt wrote: ↑Sun Sep 04, 2022 10:19 pm Rather than something sensible like, I dunno, get homes insulated, put out solar panels and grants to the most needy?
This is simple stuff to introduce, and reduce the burden on the infrastructure.
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Successive governments, to be precise. This has been a problem many decades in the making, largely because Governments don't want to make long term strategic decisions that might piss off a few voters.
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Completely agree, I think it was something like 10 years to build a nuclear station so this should always have been a priority a long time ago.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:01 pmSuccessive governments, to be precise. This has been a problem many decades in the making, largely because Governments don't want to make long term strategic decisions that might piss off a few voters.
Dave!
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
V8Granite wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:37 pmCompletely agree, I think it was something like 10 years to build a nuclear station so this should always have been a priority a long time ago.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:01 pmSuccessive governments, to be precise. This has been a problem many decades in the making, largely because Governments don't want to make long term strategic decisions that might piss off a few voters.
Dave!
An absolute unit
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Wink all you like, they never should have allowed so much renewable energy to be built, it’s laughable how silly a decision it was.ZedLeg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:46 pmV8Granite wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:37 pmCompletely agree, I think it was something like 10 years to build a nuclear station so this should always have been a priority a long time ago.Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 1:01 pm
Successive governments, to be precise. This has been a problem many decades in the making, largely because Governments don't want to make long term strategic decisions that might piss off a few voters.
Dave!
Dave!
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
I don’t completely disagree tbh but it’s part of the same problem. The policy was built around short term gain for the people putting up the wind turbines or installing solar panels rather than any thought to long term planning.
As Swerve said further up. Changing building regs to make new build housing more self sufficient regarding energy and water usage is a good idea.
As Swerve said further up. Changing building regs to make new build housing more self sufficient regarding energy and water usage is a good idea.
An absolute unit
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
4 years isn’t long enough to have ideas work aswell, even if they have been in power for 10 it was never agreed and that must alter what they end up doing.ZedLeg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:22 pm I don’t completely disagree tbh but it’s part of the same problem. The policy was built around short term gain for the people putting up the wind turbines or installing solar panels rather than any thought to long term planning.
As Swerve said further up. Changing building regs to make new build housing more self sufficient regarding energy and water usage is a good idea.
Dave!
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Typically bullish speech from Boris. Presented all together and nicely polished, his Government does come across like it’s achieved plenty.
But in this polarised world of personality, if you like the guy, he did alright under the circumstances, if you don’t it’s “lies lies lies… what about the hedgerows Boris eh??”
Anyhoo, he’s gone now so fresh starts all round.
But in this polarised world of personality, if you like the guy, he did alright under the circumstances, if you don’t it’s “lies lies lies… what about the hedgerows Boris eh??”
Anyhoo, he’s gone now so fresh starts all round.
Last edited by dinny_g on Tue Sep 06, 2022 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Poor Nadine, I assume she’s retiring to her boudoir to write a new novel about a women’s unrequited love for the honey monster.
An absolute unit
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
Spitting Image is going to be far far duller though !!Swervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Tue Sep 06, 2022 10:57 amIf nothing else comes out of this whole process, Dorries and Patel fvcking off will still be a massive win
Dave!
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
They’ve been in government for over 12 years; Cameron became PM in May 2010.V8Granite wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:37 pm4 years isn’t long enough to have ideas work aswell, even if they have been in power for 10 it was never agreed and that must alter what they end up doing.ZedLeg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:22 pm I don’t completely disagree tbh but it’s part of the same problem. The policy was built around short term gain for the people putting up the wind turbines or installing solar panels rather than any thought to long term planning.
As Swerve said further up. Changing building regs to make new build housing more self sufficient regarding energy and water usage is a good idea.
Dave!
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
What I mean is I wonder what each party would do if they knew they had a 10 year span after being voted in. Would they implement things knowing even if the outcome would be good but the short term would be unpopular they’d do it. It seems the finalJobbo wrote: ↑Wed Sep 07, 2022 10:41 pmThey’ve been in government for over 12 years; Cameron became PM in May 2010.V8Granite wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:37 pm4 years isn’t long enough to have ideas work aswell, even if they have been in power for 10 it was never agreed and that must alter what they end up doing.ZedLeg wrote: ↑Mon Sep 05, 2022 4:22 pm I don’t completely disagree tbh but it’s part of the same problem. The policy was built around short term gain for the people putting up the wind turbines or installing solar panels rather than any thought to long term planning.
As Swerve said further up. Changing building regs to make new build housing more self sufficient regarding energy and water usage is a good idea.
Dave!
Year in office is just trying to secure another term.
Dave!
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
12 years ago, mentioning multiple new Nuclear plants would lose you a GE based in Nimbyism...
Now, with the energy crisis, £6k a year potential bills has people thinking "Hmmm, Let's not be too hasty..."
Now, with the energy crisis, £6k a year potential bills has people thinking "Hmmm, Let's not be too hasty..."
- Sundayjumper
- Posts: 6271
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:04 pm
- Currently Driving: Peugeot 406
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
OT but that pic just reminded me of a story that may or may not be true - some time ago Morrissey had a car restored and for a jape the mechanics mis-wired the dash to ensure there was a light that never went out.
Re: Bye Bye Boris!
With the follow-up single being 'there is a car where the battery drains'.Sundayjumper wrote: ↑Fri Sep 09, 2022 8:12 am OT but that pic just reminded me of a story that may or may not be true - some time ago Morrissey had a car restored and for a jape the mechanics mis-wired the dash to ensure there was a light that never went out.