Page 1 of 3

BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 8:51 pm
by sec
Now the 35i engine goes 4 cylinder...:roll:

https://www.pistonheads.com/news/ph-ger ... m35i/38716

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 9:04 pm
by Rich B
18 Inch brake discs?! πŸ€”

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 9:06 pm
by Gavin
18" front discs??????????? :o How big are those wheels then?

Looks like any Kia or Hyundai from the back

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 9:10 pm
by Rich B
Absolute bollocks. The M3/4 has 370mm discs. 18inch is over 450mm.

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 9:18 pm
by nuttinnew
Looks shit.

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:17 pm
by McSwede
That's one of the reasons that the current M140i appealled to me. It'll soon be a transverse 4 with front or x-drive and a whole heap less desirable

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:25 pm
by mik
It is monumentally stoopid. :evil:

As noted recently. Helped SIL buy a 118i recently. Which is a 1.5 turbo. Of course. :roll:

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:33 pm
by Rich B
mik wrote: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:25 pm It is monumentally stoopid. :evil:

As noted recently. Helped SIL buy a 118i recently. Which is a 1.5 turbo. Of course. :roll:
theyre all at it though. The Merc A180 is also a 1.5 turbo.

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:40 pm
by mik
I know. They can all FO. :evil:

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Tue Sep 11, 2018 11:17 pm
by Swervin_Mervin
Are we already back round to going through the whole history of incorrect BMW naming strategy?

Wife likes the X2. I don't dislike it apart from it a) being an SUV therefore turd and 2: it having rubbish drivetrain options (fwd and low power petrols).

Ergo this seems like a promising compromise. SUrprised it's not Xdrive though, given that the current top diesel engined models are :?: Or maybe just turd reporting

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:07 am
by McSwede
mik wrote: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:25 pm It is monumentally stoopid. :evil:

As noted recently. Helped SIL buy a 118i recently. Which is a 1.5 turbo. Of course. :roll:
Most people will understand the hierarchy of the model range (bigger number = it being more betterer πŸ˜‚) but most people couldn't give a fuck what's under the bonnet because they treat cars like white goods.

Several people have asked me if my car is a 4ltr.

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:13 am
by JLv3.0
McSwede wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:07 ammost people couldn't give a fuck
FTFY. For all situations.

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:17 am
by McSwede
JLv3.0 wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:13 am
McSwede wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:07 ammost people couldn't give a fuck
FTFY. For all situations.
You are correct πŸ‘πŸ˜‚

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:10 am
by Rich B
McSwede wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 6:07 am
mik wrote: Tue Sep 11, 2018 10:25 pm It is monumentally stoopid. :evil:

As noted recently. Helped SIL buy a 118i recently. Which is a 1.5 turbo. Of course. :roll:
Most people will understand the hierarchy of the model range (bigger number = it being more betterer πŸ˜‚) but most people couldn't give a fuck what's under the bonnet because they treat cars like white goods.

Several people have asked me if my car is a 4ltr.
only proper ///M cars are 4ltr... πŸ˜ƒ

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:12 am
by Marv
Rich B wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:10 amonly proper ///M cars are 4ltr... πŸ˜ƒ
πŸ€”

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:13 am
by JLv3.0
The little kiddie versions, maybe.

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 8:39 am
by Rich B
Marv wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:12 am
Rich B wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 7:10 amonly proper ///M cars are 4ltr... πŸ˜ƒ
πŸ€”
only proper M cars are 3.2 ltr too!

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:00 am
by Jobbo
I spotted a lease deal on a new shape Audi A6 40TDI the other day. Assuming that 40 must mean it was the 3.0 V6 TDI, I was surprised to find it's actually the new name for the 2.0TDI. So I don't think alternative naming conventions are any better.

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:03 am
by JLv3.0
Isn't there some truly horribly complex equation for how Audi name their cars now? Or was that a joke that I didn't get?

Re: BMW's naming strategy

Posted: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:06 am
by Rich B
JLv3.0 wrote: Wed Sep 12, 2018 9:03 am Isn't there some truly horribly complex equation for how Audi name their cars now? Or was that a joke that I didn't get?
i remember you talking about that a while ago - I don’t think it’s found it’s way here yet, but it did sound ridiculous!