60-100 times

User avatar
Matty
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:50 pm
Currently Driving: 2010 Evora N/A
2005 VW Bora

Re: 60-100 times

Post by Matty » Fri Sep 13, 2019 7:27 pm

mik wrote:
Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:54 pm
Matty wrote:
Fri Sep 13, 2019 4:48 pm
Maurice wrote:
Fri Sep 13, 2019 12:54 pm
Leave it with me.

I should really re-do the Exige too as I suspect it’ll dip into the high 4s now.
If you really wanted to time the Exige you would have done it by now.
Erm.
Whoops, sorry, forum etiquette suggests it should have been IYRWTTTEYWHDIBN

User avatar
Maurice
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: 60-100 times

Post by Maurice » Sat Sep 14, 2019 2:57 pm

Turns out either the car was going uphill in 4th gear the last time the Exige was timed or the 2Bular system really does up the horsepower.

Couple of runs - first was 4.42, which looks like it was a little bit trigger happy timing wise. Second seems more representative at 4.65, so why don’t we go with that.


User avatar
mik
Posts: 2194
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: 60-100 times

Post by mik » Sat Sep 14, 2019 4:08 pm

Maurice wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 2:57 pm
Turns out either the car was going uphill in 4th gear the last time the Exige was timed or the 2Bular system really does up the horsepower.
Good to see confirmation of arse-dyno results. 8-)

Thar is rather rapid :shock:

Should probably do mine again....

User avatar
Matty
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:50 pm
Currently Driving: 2010 Evora N/A
2005 VW Bora

Re: 60-100 times

Post by Matty » Sat Sep 14, 2019 5:42 pm

That's insanely quick :shock: exhaust mods only?

I timed the Evora this afternoon. I can genuinely say "it doesn't suit my gearing" and goes to show how long the gearing is on the standard box.

2nd tops out at 85, but 3rds too long; took around 10 seconds for the 60-100 dash :lol: as you're only at 3.5k at 60.

I don't think I'll bother adding it to the table.

User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4635
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: 60-100 times

Post by JLv3.0 » Sat Sep 14, 2019 5:44 pm

That was why I started this whole thing all those years back - I was interested to see how gearing, turbo lag, manual vs auto played out in the reals. Why I was interested in anyone's guess - nothing to do at work probably :lol:

User avatar
McSwede
Posts: 777
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 10:04 pm

Re: 60-100 times

Post by McSwede » Sat Sep 14, 2019 6:29 pm

Maurice wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 2:57 pm
Turns out either the car was going uphill in 4th gear the last time the Exige was timed or the 2Bular system really does up the horsepower.

Couple of runs - first was 4.42, which looks like it was a little bit trigger happy timing wise. Second seems more representative at 4.65, so why don’t we go with that.

Meh, it was ok. Did you measure for tailwind?? If not that video is worth nowt 🤣🤣

Lightweight+good power = 😎😎😎

User avatar
Maurice
Posts: 206
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 7:19 pm

Re: 60-100 times

Post by Maurice » Sat Sep 14, 2019 9:58 pm

Matty wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 5:42 pm
That's insanely quick :shock: exhaust mods only?
2bular manifolds, HJS 200CEL Sports Cat, 2Bular Road back box and a carbon intake off of the Exige Cup R.

All in, it’s supposed to be knocking on 390bhp. Would quite like to get it on a rolling road at some point to see if that’s true, but it definitely feels good for that level of power.

User avatar
mik
Posts: 2194
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: 60-100 times

Post by mik » Sun Sep 15, 2019 12:25 am

Matty wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 5:42 pm
That's insanely quick :shock: exhaust mods only?

I timed the Evora this afternoon. I can genuinely say "it doesn't suit my gearing" and goes to show how long the gearing is on the standard box.

2nd tops out at 85, but 3rds too long; took around 10 seconds for the 60-100 dash :lol: as you're only at 3.5k at 60.

I don't think I'll bother adding it to the table.
Long Ratio box for the something.

I assume 10s was lugging in 3rd? Starting in 2nd has to yield a better result even if it includes a shift....

User avatar
integrale_evo
Posts: 1073
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 5:58 pm

Re: 60-100 times

Post by integrale_evo » Sun Sep 15, 2019 12:48 am

The rules are on page 1, doesn't have to be in a single gear, and if second goes all the way to 85 then it definitely needs to start in second and include a gear change.
Cheers, Harry

User avatar
JLv3.0
Posts: 4635
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 11:42 am

Re: 60-100 times

Post by JLv3.0 » Sun Sep 15, 2019 4:24 am

JLv3.0 wrote:
Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:08 am
1. Steady 60, not as a part of 0-100 run. I wanted to see how big a deal turbo lag was in getting from 60-100, and this wouldn't be an issue if it wasn't from a steady 60.

2. Any gear you like, and / or any mode if you're a homosexual and have a car with an automatic gearbox device. Again this was to see how much time a gearchange would take, and whether it's a better idea to do it one gear higher to not have to change.

3. If your time is not to your liking, please moan like a retarded teenage girl getting her first period about how it doesn't suit your gearing, how I cheated despite filming it, and constantly, like CONSTANTLY, using the phrase 62-98mph as my car was in kph to try and make yourself feel better about your car being slow and your life being shit.




3 is the most important.

.

User avatar
Matty
Posts: 556
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:50 pm
Currently Driving: 2010 Evora N/A
2005 VW Bora

Re: 60-100 times

Post by Matty » Sun Sep 15, 2019 11:42 am

mik wrote:
Sun Sep 15, 2019 12:25 am
Matty wrote:
Sat Sep 14, 2019 5:42 pm
That's insanely quick :shock: exhaust mods only?

I timed the Evora this afternoon. I can genuinely say "it doesn't suit my gearing" and goes to show how long the gearing is on the standard box.

2nd tops out at 85, but 3rds too long; took around 10 seconds for the 60-100 dash :lol: as you're only at 3.5k at 60.

I don't think I'll bother adding it to the table.
Long Ratio box for the something.

I assume 10s was lugging in 3rd? Starting in 2nd has to yield a better result even if it includes a shift....
It was lugging in 3rd. Obviously being a bloke I've never read past the "do 60-100" bit properly...and it was a long time ago, and it was back on the 1st page...and...

I shall try again.

Alternatively, I'll go with option 3, and also demand this should be a 30-70 test instead, which is more in line with my gearing.

Post Reply