Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Trainers without socks? (Assuming lower leg is visible due to shorts/skirt/out in your underwear)

Poll ended at Fri Aug 18, 2023 9:31 am

1. I would not wear trainers without socks. I am happy to wear normal height socks in this scenario.
9
36%
2. I would not wear trainers without socks, but only with those short "trainer socks" that are less visible and show off my fabulous ankles
15
60%
3. I would not wear trainers without socks, but only with those white knee-high St Trinians style ones
0
No votes
4. I occasionally wear trainers without socks.
1
4%
5. I regularly wear trainers without socks.
0
No votes
6. I always wear trainers without socks.
0
No votes
7. Even in the bath/shower.
0
No votes
8. And in bed
0
No votes
9. I am a serial killer that hunts down and eliminates people who wear trainers with full-height socks when the lower leg is visible.
0
No votes
10. I am a psychopath that hunts down people who wear trainers without socks - I chop off their feet and eat them. With fava beans & a glass of chianti
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 25

User avatar
mik
Posts: 11770
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by mik »

Depending on your geographic location you may refer to "Trainers" using some freaky local name such as sneakers, gutties, kicks - wotevah.
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5320
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by dinny_g »

Runners... with low socks only...
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 3869
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by jamcg »

Where’s the option for those newfangled ankle socks that strike a balance between both, so I’m not wearing full length socks, but I get to keep my Victorian modesty by covering my ankles
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by ZedLeg »

I have specific socks for wearing with shorts :lol:

Trainers without socks is a no as your trainers end up with that stale sweaty smell. Unpleasant.
An absolute unit
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11770
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by mik »

jamcg wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:06 am Where’s the option for those newfangled ankle socks that strike a balance between both, so I’m not wearing full length socks, but I get to keep my Victorian modesty by covering my ankles
@Beany is our resident fashion expert - I'll need to defer to him.
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 6344
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by Beany »

mik wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:36 am
jamcg wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 10:06 am Where’s the option for those newfangled ankle socks that strike a balance between both, so I’m not wearing full length socks, but I get to keep my Victorian modesty by covering my ankles
@Beany is our resident fashion expert - I'll need to defer to him.
Still wrong. On every level.

Every level.
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5320
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by dinny_g »

What about muddying the water ???

White Liners / Low Socks only when wearing shorts... unless you're on your Mountain Bike - then Black Mid Shin socks only (Unless you're Rich B and need the full Kevlar shin protectors...)

It's a minefield :shock:
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 4710
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by DeskJockey »

You have to wear socks with shoes. The stench will be unbearable otherwise.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 2459
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: ya mum

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by Gavster »

In a bitter twist of fashion, high socks with shorts are now cool, after the entirety of my adult life being spent avoiding visible sock. It's almost traumatic.
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by ZedLeg »

Aye, hence my current thing for buying nice socks that I only wear with shorts.
An absolute unit
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4743
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

Gavster wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 1:30 pm In a bitter twist of fashion, high socks with shorts are now cool, after the entirety of my adult life being spent avoiding visible sock. It's almost traumatic.
Fuck that shit. It has not, nor ever will be, cool. They just haven't realised yet. And when they do, those of us that have always avoided visible sock will be ahead of the curve :lol:
User avatar
jamcg
Posts: 3869
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:41 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by jamcg »

Swervin_Mervin wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 3:36 pm
Gavster wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 1:30 pm In a bitter twist of fashion, high socks with shorts are now cool, after the entirety of my adult life being spent avoiding visible sock. It's almost traumatic.
Fuck that shit. It has not, nor ever will be, cool. They just haven't realised yet. And when they do, those of us that have always avoided visible sock will be ahead of the curve :lol:
They’ll realise when they have t-shirt tan but on their legs 😂
User avatar
ZedLeg
Posts: 6122
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:19 pm

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by ZedLeg »

These very fashionable legs disagree :lol:
IMG_0519.jpeg
IMG_0519.jpeg (42.29 KiB) Viewed 1089 times
An absolute unit
V8Granite
Posts: 3963
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:57 am

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by V8Granite »

Twats who don’t wear socks most likely also pop their collars.

Dave!
User avatar
Carlos
Posts: 2179
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by Carlos »

I have a mate who is as sound as a pound but has an aversion to socks. Suit and brogues, no socks, trainers, no socks, jesus sandals, no socks, safety boots, no socks. No socks ever :D
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 2459
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: ya mum

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by Gavster »

That makes no sense. The entire shoe-wearing experience is awful without socks.
User avatar
Wilspeed
Posts: 105
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 7:54 am

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by Wilspeed »

Trainers are for sports and children.

Image
Cunt.
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 4710
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by DeskJockey »

What dapper gents :lol: :lol:
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
User avatar
Carlos
Posts: 2179
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 10:38 am

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by Carlos »

DeskJockey wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 8:15 pm What dapper gents :lol: :lol:
Not sure if he's still here but that's how I picture Nathan and is mates :)
User avatar
DeskJockey
Posts: 4710
Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am

Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)

Post by DeskJockey »

Carlos wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 9:23 pm
DeskJockey wrote: Wed Jun 28, 2023 8:15 pm What dapper gents :lol: :lol:
Not sure if he's still here but that's how I picture Nathan and is mates :)
Isn't @Rich B famous (here at least) for always wearing shorts? Could that be him on the left?
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Post Reply