Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Depending on your geographic location you may refer to "Trainers" using some freaky local name such as sneakers, gutties, kicks - wotevah.
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Runners... with low socks only...
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Where’s the option for those newfangled ankle socks that strike a balance between both, so I’m not wearing full length socks, but I get to keep my Victorian modesty by covering my ankles
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
I have specific socks for wearing with shorts
Trainers without socks is a no as your trainers end up with that stale sweaty smell. Unpleasant.
Trainers without socks is a no as your trainers end up with that stale sweaty smell. Unpleasant.
An absolute unit
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
What about muddying the water ???
White Liners / Low Socks only when wearing shorts... unless you're on your Mountain Bike - then Black Mid Shin socks only (Unless you're Rich B and need the full Kevlar shin protectors...)
It's a minefield
White Liners / Low Socks only when wearing shorts... unless you're on your Mountain Bike - then Black Mid Shin socks only (Unless you're Rich B and need the full Kevlar shin protectors...)
It's a minefield
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4711
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
You have to wear socks with shoes. The stench will be unbearable otherwise.
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
In a bitter twist of fashion, high socks with shorts are now cool, after the entirety of my adult life being spent avoiding visible sock. It's almost traumatic.
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Aye, hence my current thing for buying nice socks that I only wear with shorts.
An absolute unit
- Swervin_Mervin
- Posts: 4743
- Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Fuck that shit. It has not, nor ever will be, cool. They just haven't realised yet. And when they do, those of us that have always avoided visible sock will be ahead of the curve
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
They’ll realise when they have t-shirt tan but on their legsSwervin_Mervin wrote: ↑Wed Jun 28, 2023 3:36 pmFuck that shit. It has not, nor ever will be, cool. They just haven't realised yet. And when they do, those of us that have always avoided visible sock will be ahead of the curve
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
These very fashionable legs disagree
An absolute unit
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Twats who don’t wear socks most likely also pop their collars.
Dave!
Dave!
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
I have a mate who is as sound as a pound but has an aversion to socks. Suit and brogues, no socks, trainers, no socks, jesus sandals, no socks, safety boots, no socks. No socks ever
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
That makes no sense. The entire shoe-wearing experience is awful without socks.
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4711
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
What dapper gents
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Not sure if he's still here but that's how I picture Nathan and is mates
- DeskJockey
- Posts: 4711
- Joined: Thu Apr 12, 2018 8:58 am
Re: Trainers without socks (lower legs visible edition)
Isn't @Rich B famous (here at least) for always wearing shorts? Could that be him on the left?
---
Driving a Galaxy far far away
Driving a Galaxy far far away