FAO MarkBT52 and Jobbo
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:19 am
Page 1 of 1
Re: FAO MarkBT52 and Jobbo
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:23 am
Re: FAO MarkBT52 and Jobbo
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:28 am
In Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language (1755), the word anus is not included despite being used in two definitions: http://qi.com/infocloud/dr-johnson.
Those two definitions being 'Notorious' and 'Rev'.
Those two definitions being 'Notorious' and 'Rev'.
Re: FAO MarkBT52 and Jobbo
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:29 am
And also:
Re: FAO MarkBT52 and Jobbo
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:37 am
Rude.Jobbo wrote: Fri May 18, 2018 11:28 am In Johnson's A Dictionary of the English Language (1755), the word anus is not included despite being used in two definitions: http://qi.com/infocloud/dr-johnson.
Those two definitions being 'Notorious' and 'Rev'.
Re: FAO MarkBT52 and Jobbo
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:37 am
As dark as a mole?
Re: FAO MarkBT52 and Jobbo
Posted: Fri May 18, 2018 11:48 am
I'm just upset no one here noticed this one for me: