It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9884
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Mito Man »

Fuck me, you wouldn't get anywhere in a busy city centre if you stopped whenever it got a bit tight and if you wanted to give the full 1.5 metres.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9345
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

Highway Code is not law; it might be relevant if there had been a collision in apportioning blame, but there was no collision. I think the police should probably not comment on this sort of rabble-rousing Vine guff.
User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9345
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

Mito Man wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 10:22 am Fuck me, you wouldn't get anywhere in a busy city centre if you stopped whenever it got a bit tight and if you wanted to give the full 1.5 metres.
1.5m only applies to overtaking, not to passing vehicles going the other way - ridiculous really. It's rule 163.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9884
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Mito Man »

It’s just all round awkwardness in London, 80% of the time cyclists are going faster than cars. So you’re probably less than a metre from the kerb anyway and dawdling along, a cyclists comes up and undertakes you, you can’t actually move over to the right anymore because the roads are tight. Next thing you know some cvnt has sent it to Jeremy Vine 😂
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 4768
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Simon »

The artist formerly known as _Who_
V8Granite
Posts: 3963
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:57 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by V8Granite »

Mine was that age and cycling in the road but….

I told him when to stop and go, we talked about where he should be when in the car leading up to it, I talked through everything I was looking at when cycling and it was dry on a relatively low traffic area.

Rules are rules but there is no reason to be the right person in the morgue. I think the car was fine because as soon as you teach people to expect something they become less aware.

Dave!
User avatar
Jimexpl
Posts: 488
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 11:30 pm
Contact:

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jimexpl »

V8Granite wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 1:35 pm Mine was that age and cycling in the road but….

Dave!
Would you have let them do it on a suburban London street where most of the drivers will not be local to that area, many looking at social media rather than the road ahead, and the remainder focused on 20mph cameras that now go off at 23mph?
I was riding on the road in the 1980s at the age of 5, but my kids will be staying on the pavement for a while longer (6 1/2 and 4 1/2 now).
tim
Posts: 1653
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

Rich B wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 9:52 am My boy is 5, I still get jittery walking on pavements when cars go past a bit fast.
Mine are 12 and 13 and I still walk between them and the road when we're out. Doesn't get many views and likes though.
User avatar
nuttinnew
Posts: 8878
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:14 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by nuttinnew »

mik wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 8:23 am
Posting mainly because Jeremy Vile used the term “petrosexual”.

I was disappoint not to find a "I've got an electric car, would it have been ok in that?" type post :(
tim
Posts: 1653
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

Oh, lols. Can anyone still see the original tweet?

User avatar
Jobbo
Posts: 9345
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:20 pm
Currently Driving: S6 Avant, Jimny, Macan, Mini

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Jobbo »

tim wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:47 pm Oh, lols. Can anyone still see the original tweet?
No, it was hidden for me when I saw your reply appear on Twitter. What did it say?
tim
Posts: 1653
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

Jobbo wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:55 pm
tim wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:47 pm Oh, lols. Can anyone still see the original tweet?
No, it was hidden for me when I saw your reply appear on Twitter. What did it say?
It was a video of one of these vigilante pretend policeman types carelessly cycling into opposing traffic to tell off some woman who was blatently using her phone. And then a follow-up video of him doing it again *to the same woman* an hour later.
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 6345
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Beany »

Always screenshot, then respond. ;)
V8Granite
Posts: 3963
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:57 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by V8Granite »

Jimexpl wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:22 pm
V8Granite wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 1:35 pm Mine was that age and cycling in the road but….

Dave!
Would you have let them do it on a suburban London street where most of the drivers will not be local to that area, many looking at social media rather than the road ahead, and the remainder focused on 20mph cameras that now go off at 23mph?
I was riding on the road in the 1980s at the age of 5, but my kids will be staying on the pavement for a while longer (6 1/2 and 4 1/2 now).
The roads we do it on have much fewer obstacles to navigate.

I don’t agree with cycling on pavements near us though as they are too narrow.

Dave!
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11783
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by mik »

tim wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:57 pm
Jobbo wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:55 pm
tim wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 3:47 pm Oh, lols. Can anyone still see the original tweet?
No, it was hidden for me when I saw your reply appear on Twitter. What did it say?
It was a video of one of these vigilante pretend policeman types carelessly cycling into opposing traffic to tell off some woman who was blatently using her phone. And then a follow-up video of him doing it again *to the same woman* an hour later.
This just popped up in my feed. Sounds like CyclingMikey from YouTube.

tim
Posts: 1653
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

He blocked me. What a bell.
tim
Posts: 1653
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

Beany wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 6:09 pm Always screenshot, then respond. ;)
A video? I knew you were extra but even so....
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 4768
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Simon »

tim wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 9:06 pm He blocked me. What a bell.
Which, the one you posted above? I can't see it either.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
tim
Posts: 1653
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 9:27 am

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by tim »

I have re-twatted his twattery. Follow me bro. Like n share etc.
User avatar
Beany
Posts: 6345
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 5:27 pm

Re: It’s time for another forum cycle/vehicle disagreement

Post by Beany »

tim wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 9:18 pm
Beany wrote: Tue Nov 08, 2022 6:09 pm Always screenshot, then respond. ;)
A video? I knew you were extra but even so....
I am extra. Extra special.

We don't discuss the definition of 'special'.
Post Reply