Page 4 of 5
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2022 9:59 pm
by Mito Man
There’s 2 definitions for meatloafting:
1. When two people shove shit up each others' asses.
Steve was meatloafing so hard with Alex so hard that Alex's shit poured out of Steve's anus.
2. (v) having sex with a woman while she is on her period. Derived from the red, tomato-based sauce found on top of meatloaf
Jeff: Dude, why is there so much blood on your bed?
Justin: Me and Natalie were totally meatloafing last night.
I think we can assume definition 1 is most suitable for the above. Don’t forget your condoms.
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:35 pm
by Broccers
Did he really expect me to ring him up? Did anyone? I'll continue winding you all up when I choose and on my terms
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:38 pm
by Rich B
Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:35 pm
Did he really expect me to ring him up? Did anyone? I'll continue winding you all up when I choose and on my terms
You got called out Broccers. Badly. I'm embarrassed for you.
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:40 pm
by Broccers
Rich B wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:38 pm
Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:35 pm
Did he really expect me to ring him up? Did anyone? I'll continue winding you all up when I choose and on my terms
You got called out Broccers. Badly. I'm embarrassed for you.
You seem to actually care too much. I'm actually worried about you ? Give me a ring
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 3:23 am
by ZedLeg
Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:35 pm
Did he really expect me to ring him up? Did anyone? I'll continue winding you all up when I choose and on my terms
So weird
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 8:21 am
by Sundayjumper
Well let’s dig further. The number Broccers sent me - and which I deliberately didn’t share before out of courtesy is 07977 133452. Anyone know if that’s really his number ?
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:26 am
by Broccers
What I find really amusing is you 3 chasing me around a forum. Thats weird. And no thats not the number, I sent you the correct one. Thanks for not posting it tho, you never know which cranks might ring me
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:30 am
by Sundayjumper
Nope, that’s the number you sent me.
- C3549DA9-021C-4401-BD82-5978B3DCB544.jpeg (142.94 KiB) Viewed 769 times
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:32 am
by Sundayjumper
And
@nuttinnew - my words are always chosen deliberately. Impotent is absolutely correct here.
- F633B3C3-9B86-4C64-A3C9-061E51377E63.jpeg (33.95 KiB) Viewed 765 times
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:33 am
by Broccers
Did you ring it?
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:34 am
by Sundayjumper
Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:26 am
And no thats not the number, I sent you the correct one.
No you didn't. Already established that.
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:39 am
by Broccers
Sundayjumper wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:34 am
Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:26 am
And no thats not the number, I sent you the correct one.
No you didn't. Already established that.
Of course Im not actually going to a) do anything you ask and b) not stop winding you up.
But for today tho I have other things to do.
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:48 am
by Sundayjumper
Ah, you're going for the "how to win teh internet (kindergarten edition)" approach. Page 2 specifies two unbeatable comebacks:
a) I'm too busy to reply to you
b) I'm too important to reply to you
I guess this means you've won.
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:51 am
by ZedLeg
He's wound everyone up so much, just admit that you're irreversibly triggered SJ
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:57 am
by Sundayjumper
IM TAKING BACK CONTROL
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:20 am
by Gwaredd
Ahh, the good old CLASSIC WINDUP!!! from days of yore
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:34 am
by Sundayjumper
I'm just being a butthurt because my set-up to "I'd do anything for Lviv" didn't get more appreciation. It's topical dammit !
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 1:14 pm
by nuttinnew
Broccers wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 10:35 pm
Did he really expect me to ring him up? Did anyone? I'll continue winding you all up when I choose and on my terms*
Why would anybody expect you to ring him when you'd said you'd text him? Which you didn't do, obvs not a man of your word.
*Either;
1/. Terms and conditions subject to change without notice.
or;
2/. half terms seem more appropriate.
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 1:15 pm
by nuttinnew
Sundayjumper wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 9:32 am
And @nuttinnew - my words are always chosen deliberately.
Sundayjumper wrote: ↑Tue Mar 01, 2022 8:58 pm
Cripey, I didn’t know that ! I was referring to “meatloaf” being a popular (err, so I’ve heard) safe word in BDSM, i.e. “I’d do anything for love but I won’t do that”
Re: FAO Broccers
Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2022 1:19 pm
by nuttinnew
Sundayjumper wrote: ↑Wed Mar 02, 2022 10:34 am
I'm just being a butthurt because my set-up to "I'd do anything for Lviv" didn't get more appreciation. It's topical dammit !
It wasn't my/our place to comment, also why there isn't a "You took the words right out of mouth." in a couple of obvious places.