Royal Family

Royal Family?

Aye
20
49%
Naw
10
24%
Dinnae Care
11
27%
 
Total votes: 41

User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9628
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: Royal Family

Post by Rich B »

dinny_g wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:39 pm Question - why is no one saying Hysterectomy ??

It’s pretty clear that’s what she had and would explain the public absence.
because their PR team is hopeless and seem to turn every molehill into a mountain. I still don't get how we managed (in the 2024 world of the Kardashians, Botox and instagram filters) to have them vilified for having dared to release a "touched up" photo! :o
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 4767
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by Simon »

Because, 'private family' as they are, she's producing photos of historical record. Was the Queen ever really with all her Grandchildren 2 summers ago? It looks like Louis has been added in afterwards, for example.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
Rich B
Posts: 9628
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:22 pm
Currently Driving: M2 Competition

Re: Royal Family

Post by Rich B »

Simon wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2024 8:17 pm Because, 'private family' as they are, she's producing photos of historical record. Was the Queen ever really with all her Grandchildren 2 summers ago? It looks like Louis has been added in afterwards, for example.
I'm sure every monarch in history made sure their portrait was flattering and every painting, tapestry and statue told the story they wanted to be told. And Conspiracy theories around royal families are nothing new - what do you want the outcome to be?
User avatar
240PP
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:27 am
Currently Driving: A5 3.0 TDI, 987 S.

Re: Royal Family

Post by 240PP »

Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2024 8:14 pm
dinny_g wrote: Tue Mar 19, 2024 6:39 pm Question - why is no one saying Hysterectomy ??

It’s pretty clear that’s what she had and would explain the public absence.
because their PR team is hopeless and seem to turn every molehill into a mountain. I still don't get how we managed (in the 2024 world of the Kardashians, Botox and instagram filters) to have them vilified for having dared to release a "touched up" photo! :o
I don’t get why people are losing their mind over this. A family photo was ‘shopped, not very well, then released to the media. Who cares, move the fuck on!
User avatar
240PP
Posts: 1432
Joined: Sat Apr 14, 2018 9:27 am
Currently Driving: A5 3.0 TDI, 987 S.

Re: Royal Family

Post by 240PP »

User avatar
John
Posts: 1184
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by John »

Cancer

No doubt the loony conspiracy theorists won't back down.
User avatar
MikeHunt
Posts: 718
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:34 am

Re: Royal Family

Post by MikeHunt »

Gerald Ratner school of pr.
User avatar
IanF
Posts: 2414
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 3:58 pm
Currently Driving: Ferrari F430 Spider
BMW M4 Comp
Mini Cooper
LR Evoque P300e
Contact:

Re: Royal Family

Post by IanF »

You would hope the press would give them privacy now, but probably hound them even more
Cheers,

Ian
User avatar
mik
Posts: 11769
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 6:15 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by mik »

IanF wrote: Fri Mar 22, 2024 6:46 pm You would hope the press would give them privacy now, but probably hound them even more
Yeah the tabloid press are renowned for their compassion.
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9879
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by Mito Man »

It'll be even worse now I reckon. She was doing the wounded animal pretending it's fine thing ok (because they knew it would be worse if the press found out) but I guess that cunt in the hospital who looked up her personal records would have spilled the beans to the Daily Mail for £2000 sooner or later.
How about not having a sig at all?
User avatar
Simon
Posts: 4767
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:03 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by Simon »

When was that though? Apparently BBC studios recorded the video message on Wednesday. Assuming that takes a day or two to organise, it could've been that it was planned anyway to now that she'll likely be out of action for longer than the original 'Easter return' timetable.
The artist formerly known as _Who_
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5319
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by dinny_g »

Jesus - just back from a day of funeral stuff for an old friend to read this. I thought it was just normal ‘women stuff’ she was going through.

God love her. 42 years old and going through this. Bless her heart ❤️
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Swervin_Mervin
Posts: 4743
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 8:58 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by Swervin_Mervin »

dinny_g wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 12:02 am Jesus - just back from a day of funeral stuff for an old friend to read this. I thought it was just normal ‘women stuff’ she was going through.

God love her. 42 years old and going through this. Bless her heart ❤️
Normal woman stuff is not serious abdominal surgery. As soon as that initial statement was made everyone should have just stfu. I'd like to think there's some strong shoe gazing going on right now from a lot of the morons but I know that's highly unlikely
User avatar
dinny_g
Posts: 5319
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:31 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by dinny_g »

Hysterectomy’s are pretty serious. That’s what I thought it was…
JLv3.0 wrote: Thu Jun 21, 2018 4:26 pm I say this rarely Dave, but listen to Dinny because he's right.
Rich B wrote: Thu Jun 02, 2022 1:57 pm but Dinny was right…
User avatar
Gavster
Posts: 2459
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2021 11:31 am
Currently Driving: ya mum

Re: Royal Family

Post by Gavster »

dinny_g wrote: Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:42 pm Hysterectomy’s are pretty serious. That’s what I thought it was…
It still could have been that too. They said she had major non-cancer-related surgery, then the cancer was discovered afterwards.

Their family is going through a helluva lot right now, hoping she can get through this quickly and fully recover.

Rumour has it that an American title had paid to get their grubby hands on her medical records. That meant the only option for her family was to make an announcement to avoid the splash. God knows that sometimes we don't want to speak to people, let alone the whole world.
V8Granite
Posts: 3963
Joined: Fri Apr 13, 2018 11:57 am

Re: Royal Family

Post by V8Granite »

If someone asked you how much money would it take to be critiqued by the world, where half of them don’t like the very idea of you anyway, then that number doesn’t exist so it’s certainly not a charmed life at all.

Dave!
User avatar
Mito Man
Posts: 9879
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2018 4:27 pm

Re: Royal Family

Post by Mito Man »

I thought it’s £86,500 😂
How about not having a sig at all?
Post Reply