OV9

For cars that have been defiled, who want to end the misery. The pain is too much.

I shall start proceedings with this.

It will only hurt briefly before your soul is free.....

mik wrote: Mon Jan 18, 2021 11:59 pm For cars that have been defiled, who want to end the misery. The pain is too much.

I shall start proceedings with this.

It will only hurt briefly before your soul is free.....

Motion 2nd'd

At least it isn't in an awful colour. Crush away.

THEY PAID £14100 TO MAKE IT LOOK LIKE THAT?????!!!!!

I don't think it's that bad, 23" wheels are daft and the front grill is dumb, but at least the kit shares the basic design language of the base car. Nothing worse than an angular car with a curvy kit on it or vice versa. That one just exaggerates the original shapes.

Still a colossal waste of £14k.

Rich B wrote: Tue Jan 19, 2021 8:09 am Still a colossal waste of £14k.

I’d always assumed these companies were just fronts to launder cash. A legitimate businessman wouldn’t do that to their car.

It’s probably the alloys, sorry - the rimz that are most offensive. I love that they parked it on zig-zags to take the photos.

The wheels are not the worst thing about the car.
That grill looks like a cheap plastic desk organiser.
The front valance and splitter reeks of I wanted a sports car, but since I had an accident with Chantell again after drinking too much Asda Proscecco and Stella we need the boot space.
The arches look like an after thought stuck on, probably same thought went into their catalog picked tattoo.
The rear tinted windows darker than the bodywork look cheap, probably to hide the Argos car seats and Asda shopping bags.
The personalised name and badge on the back has a strong hint of someone who spent all their money on finance of the car and has to buy their skin tight bright polo shirts and too light a shade of trousers from Primark.
The rear valance looks like its been stolen from a budget cruise liner's gas BBQ.
The rear wing reminds me of the handles off my wheely bin.
Made a bold statement by keeping the rear lights and wing mirrors standard, money probably went on a family McDonalds instead.

Double post

Running full slicks on the front it appears! Photo 4

Also just noticed, in the description it says £45,000 no offers, yet they put it up as an auction...........

They've made a RRS look like an Evoque. Very odd.

Want a genuine Range Rover but want it to look like a cheap Chinese clone? Then we have the car for you!


"First to see will buy!"

Ah, you can't beat the old classics.

GG. wrote: Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:31 am They've made a RRS look like an Evoque. Very odd.

that was my very first thought too - is it an Evoque?

Delphi wrote: Tue Jan 19, 2021 9:31 am Want a genuine Range Rover but want it to look like a cheap Chinese clone? Then we have the car for you!


"First to see will buy!"

Ah, you can't beat the old classics.

First to see will burn.

It'd be a more apt response to that, IMHO.

Oh my god, they did the same thing to the other side.

Bidding ends in two minutes, make sure you all get them in! I hope the offer of £36k is a joke.

It's basically a c.£40k car without all that crap, ironically the seller thinks it adds £5k, whereas eBay shows it minuses £4k!

mik wrote: Mon Jan 18, 2021 11:59 pm For cars that have been defiled, who want to end the misery. The pain is too much.

I had a picture of car somewhere....someone had used tippex to fill in the text on the tyres. Let me see if I can find it....