Page 408 of 436

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:39 am
by Broccers
I answered the questions. For some strange reason you seem to be off on a tangent about conspiracy theories. Where's that mentioned in my posts?

At the beginning of the more recent chat I said plan b should have been got rid of already. That is all.

Keeping the fear for a prolonged period isn't doing people any good, in fact the opposite.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:50 am
by Rich B
You're giving them way to much credit - the fear is just as strong from their side, they're shit scared of dropping all restrictions and getting it wrong and having 60m people telling them so.

There's no extra control from having restrictions carrying on - they gain nothing.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:56 am
by Broccers
Rich B wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 8:50 am You're giving them way to much credit - the fear is just as strong from their side, they're shit scared of dropping all restrictions and getting it wrong and having 60m people telling them so.

There's no extra control from having restrictions carrying on - they gain nothing.
Hey mate they're fucking useless I agree. Too slow to do anything although they did get the vaccines out quickly. Whether they actually work is a different matter πŸ˜‚

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:37 am
by Jobbo
Rich B wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:38 am
Broccers wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:34 am
Rich B wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:24 am so that's the total of the "control" they have - wearing a mask in a shop? That seems like a great reward for 2 years of destroying the economy and their public ratings - what a well thought out plan.
I believe you cant visit your relatives in hospital either. Plenty of other restrictions, you can dyor.
So explain how some people wearing masks to work for a few months and being cautious about spreading viruses is part of their great plan to "control"?

What extra power they didn't have before have they actually achieved from this?
@Broccers You didn't answer Rich's question about what control you think the Government is gaining over us.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:51 am
by Sundayjumper
CONRTOLLL !!!!

DYOR !!!!!!!!!!!!

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:53 am
by Gwaredd
Not just our Government remember. The whole Worlds respective Governments too. #InItTogether

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:54 am
by Broccers
Jobbo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:37 am
Rich B wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:38 am
Broccers wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:34 am

I believe you cant visit your relatives in hospital either. Plenty of other restrictions, you can dyor.
So explain how some people wearing masks to work for a few months and being cautious about spreading viruses is part of their great plan to "control"?

What extra power they didn't have before have they actually achieved from this?
@Broccers You didn't answer Rich's question about what control you think the Government is gaining over us.
Tiresome

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:56 am
by IanF
It’s a CON, Broccers is a TROLL.. guys, I’ve worked it out! 🀯🀯🀣

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:05 am
by Rich B
Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:54 am
Jobbo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:37 am
Rich B wrote: ↑Mon Jan 17, 2022 11:38 am So explain how some people wearing masks to work for a few months and being cautious about spreading viruses is part of their great plan to "control"?

What extra power they didn't have before have they actually achieved from this?
@Broccers You didn't answer Rich's question about what control you think the Government is gaining over us.
Tiresome
it would be a lot less tiresome if you responded with actual answers - that's how discussions work.

I or you might not be right on everything, but if you make a controversial statement and people ask you to substantiate what you mean and why, surely the least tiresome way to deal with it is to answer the question - otherwise why make the statement in the first place?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:12 am
by Sundayjumper
Rich B wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:05 am ....if you make a controversial statement and people ask you to substantiate what you mean and why, surely the least tiresome way to deal with it is to answer the question - otherwise why make the statement in the first place?

This is how Broccers maintains CONRTOLLL !!!!

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:20 am
by Marv
Sundayjumper wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:51 am CONRTOLLL !!!!

DYOR !!!!!!!!!!!!
Controll?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 11:28 am
by Sundayjumper
The TROLL is a CON.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 11:44 am
by ZedLeg
Everyone ripping off Ianf's joke :lol:

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 1:59 pm
by Beany
Rich B wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 10:05 am I or you might not be right on everything, but if you make a controversial statement and people ask you to substantiate what you mean and why, surely the least tiresome way to deal with it is to answer the question - otherwise why make the statement in the first place?
To own the libs, obviously.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:10 pm
by Broccers
Arent you all bored yet :lol: :lol:

I see they are releasing us as planned next week.

Wahay

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:24 pm
by Rich B
Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:10 pm Arent you all bored yet :lol: :lol:

I see they are releasing us as planned next week.

Wahay
How does this fit in with your control comment?

Are they giving up the control or have they got some extra control from the lockdowns they can benefit from in some way going forward?

I'm not point scoring, I'm genuinely interested to understand what you think the gain is that was worth destroying the economy and the governments popularity for.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:25 pm
by nuttinnew
ZedLeg wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 11:44 am Everyone ripping off Ianf's joke :lol:
CUNT TROLL, or, with the Gloucester variant, CUNT ROLL.


OMG :o I've just realised, the Gloucester variant was responsible for last year's Christmas songs; Kunt and the gang, sausage rolls, they're all at it.

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 3:15 pm
by Jobbo
Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 9:54 am Tiresome
What is tiresome is when you say something controversial, don't say what your view is, don't answer the direct question, wait a few days then say you've answered already.

Boris would be proud, but we see through you just like we do him :lol:

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 5:04 pm
by dan
I see the 'Fear' thing is always part of the argument, why is that. Some fuckwit I know keeps posting about it on facebook.

I've had all my jabs and I wear a mask but i'm not afraid of anything, just doing what I think is right. Why do the conspiracy theorist loonies equate that to me being afraid of something?

Re: Coronavirus

Posted: Wed Jan 19, 2022 5:06 pm
by Broccers
Rich B wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:24 pm
Broccers wrote: ↑Wed Jan 19, 2022 2:10 pm Arent you all bored yet :lol: :lol:

I see they are releasing us as planned next week.

Wahay
How does this fit in with your control comment?

Are they giving up the control or have they got some extra control from the lockdowns they can benefit from in some way going forward?

I'm not point scoring, I'm genuinely interested to understand what you think the gain is that was worth destroying the economy and the governments popularity for.
I have no idea - do you? I do know previously tho you could go to work in the NHS and not be forced to have a jab. You could enter countries without proving your medical status. While I understand why and in many circumstances its good however the rules are quick to come in yet take ages to be recindered.

If I lived in Scotland or Wales I'd be pretty annoyed. Or NZ where everyone seems shit scared of their own shadow.

How will the winter olympics pan out in China? No spectators at all? Sounds a right riot. :lol: