Isn't that just generally good advice anyway?
(FWIW Linda Bauld is pretty legit)
I was just going on this article, but I guess that's no guarantee! Link
Could actually be very deliberate if you think outside the box... if, say, a particular demographic that congregates in large numbers in houses but does not go out drinking in pubs were the area of concern and the source of the increasing infections, presumably you would enact a measure saying don't congregate inside but fine to go to the pub. Only if you see it as a measure for society as a whole is it incongruous.duncs500 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:09 amI was just going on this article, but I guess that's no guarantee! Link
"The measures mean different households will not be allowed to meet in homes or private gardens. Individual households will still be able to go to pubs and restaurants but not mix with another household."
Got any insight on how a tweet from Matt Hancock has force of law?GG. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:31 amCould actually be very deliberate if you think outside the box... if, say, a particular demographic that congregates in large numbers in houses but does not go out drinking in pubs were the area of concern and the source of the increasing infections, presumably you would enact a measure saying don't congregate inside but fine to go to the pub. Only if you see it as a measure for society as a whole is it incongruous.duncs500 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:09 amI was just going on this article, but I guess that's no guarantee! Link
"The measures mean different households will not be allowed to meet in homes or private gardens. Individual households will still be able to go to pubs and restaurants but not mix with another household."
Twitter was the forum for announcement of this new lockdown. No SI has been published. So it's impossible to know what the law will actually say; the only info we have originates from Matt Hancock's tweets.GG. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:41 am I haven't seen a tweet from Matt Hancock! I'm trying to determine logic from banning household gatherings but letting people go to the pub. I'm not suggesting anything has the force of law unless it has been promulgated by statutory instrument or some other delegated power.
@ZedLeg In my ignorance didn't Eid overlapped with the taking of this measure. Seems very coincidental if that wasn't the specific intention...
Assuming low voluntary cooperation and the breakdown of the social contract... in which you may well be right as after months of restrictions I imagine many will ignore it. That's not to say that actual laws without enforcement are pretty worthless too, though!Jobbo wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:43 amTwitter was the forum for announcement of this new lockdown. No SI has been published. So it's impossible to know what the law will actually say; the only info we have originates from Matt Hancock's tweets.GG. wrote: ↑Fri Jul 31, 2020 9:41 am I haven't seen a tweet from Matt Hancock! I'm trying to determine logic from banning household gatherings but letting people go to the pub. I'm not suggesting anything has the force of law unless it has been promulgated by statutory instrument or some other delegated power.
@ZedLeg In my ignorance didn't Eid overlapped with the taking of this measure. Seems very coincidental if that wasn't the specific intention...
I don't propose to comment on what the law says until the SI is published; for the moment, I restrict my comments to the fact that this isn't law so it's pretty worthless.