Page 391 of 484
Re: Randomness
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 7:50 pm
by nuttinnew
Re: Randomness
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 8:29 pm
by dinny_g
nuttinnew wrote: Wed Feb 14, 2024 6:19 pm
Que?
Yeah, tik toks weird that way.
It was a clip of scaffolders flying down the scaffold to get to the pub.
Never mind. #BecauseDinny

Re: Randomness
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 9:45 pm
by nuttinnew
Ah, ta

You're fine this time, this is #Becausetiktok

Re: Randomness
Posted: Wed Feb 14, 2024 11:48 pm
by dinny_g
Re: Randomness
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2024 5:37 pm
by mik
60’s car magazine test car of compact cars…
The numbers are pretty laughable today - only one capable of breaking the 75mph vmax barrier, but the brake fade test is just nuts - a 0.5g stop from approx 55mph, performed 20 times, but with
1 minute intervals between each stop!
Re: Randomness
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2024 6:11 pm
by integrale_evo
Strange that they used a fiat 600 not an 850, which is much closer in size and layout to the imp. Maybe it was too expensive?
Re: Randomness
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2024 11:10 pm
by jamcg
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:55 am
by nuttinnew
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:55 am
by nuttinnew
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 8:31 am
by mik
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 1:18 pm
by IanF
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 1:37 pm
by mik
I loved having pop-up lights on the 944S2.
Except when washing it - if you popped them up it was difficult to reach the rearmost edge of the covers, so I tended to pop them up mid-wash.

Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 5:29 pm
by Sundayjumper

- 1b49f554-af40-4dec-93fb-56baad56556e.jpeg (110.73 KiB) Viewed 803 times
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 6:32 pm
by nuttinnew
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 8:34 pm
by Sundayjumper

- IMG_0192.jpeg (24.22 KiB) Viewed 771 times
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 8:37 pm
by Beany
I'm imagining swastikas. Swastikas everywhere.
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 9:58 pm
by nuttinnew
You don't have anything like that yet the same exclusions apply.
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 10:03 pm
by nuttinnew
Ah. I was thinking through options, didn't consider that one.
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 10:07 pm
by nuttinnew
mik wrote: Thu Feb 15, 2024 5:37 pm
60’s car magazine test car of compact cars…
The numbers are pretty laughable today - only one capable of breaking the 75mph vmax barrier, but the brake fade test is just nuts - a 0.5g stop from approx 55mph, performed 20 times, but with
1 minute intervals between each stop!
I'm sure a lot of far more recent cars would struggle 30-50 in top.
What engine size would the Mini have been?
Re: Randomness
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2024 10:37 pm
by Beany
nuttinnew wrote: Fri Feb 16, 2024 9:58 pm
You don't have anything like that yet the same exclusions apply.
.........fair.