Page 4 of 159

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 5:46 pm
by Zonda_
I remember MarkBT_52 taking me round Donington in his Exige, bonkers. Only thing I've passengered in that was quicker was a 340R!

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 6:04 pm
by JonMad
Carlos wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 3:24 pm
JonMad wrote: Sat Feb 29, 2020 3:12 pm Yeah I know they’re rare and all but £280k vs about £5k I expect, for a CLK55. :shock:
Are they the same underpinnings ?
Well, the DTM is supercharged, so 200+bhp more, and can do 200mph and 60 in < 4s. So there is that.

Same basic engine as some others though, albeit retuned: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes- ... Kompressor

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:31 am
by Coaster1

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 am
by Rich B
pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 8:03 am
by Alex_
The picture reminds me those Alfa circular alloys are some of the most beautiful designs ever.

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 8:41 am
by JonMad
It does look lovely. And so small. A 2+2 as well.

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:50 am
by NotoriousREV
I’m trying to buy this but the seller isn’t responding.
F00E4DA7-F4AC-4B02-9D89-AE7D1E2AD0CF.jpeg
F00E4DA7-F4AC-4B02-9D89-AE7D1E2AD0CF.jpeg (77.06 KiB) Viewed 13201 times

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:01 am
by GG.
NotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:50 am I’m trying to buy this but the seller isn’t responding.

F00E4DA7-F4AC-4B02-9D89-AE7D1E2AD0CF.jpeg
He probably only communicates over CB radio ;)


Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 am
by integrale_evo
Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 am
pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?
Because it was designed in the 70s

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:40 am
by Carlos
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 am
Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 am
pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?
Because it was designed in the 70s
A 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?

Those GTV go really well and are a right handful drive. The oddest driving position i have ever come across, i couldnt get remotely comfortable.

ETA- The advert is wrong as they were 230bhp.

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:43 pm
by Rich B
Carlos wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:40 am
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 am
Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 am pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?
Because it was designed in the 70s
A 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?

Those GTV go really well and are a right handful drive. The oddest driving position i have ever come across, i couldnt get remotely comfortable.

ETA- The advert is wrong as they were 230bhp.
was the 3.2 around 230bhp? Equally pathetic for something supposed to be a special version.

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:58 pm
by Mito Man
It was on purpose so you could be on the loud pedal for longer and listen to that glorious V6 ;)
Not like new cars nowadays where after 3 seconds of throttle you’re banned from driving.

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:01 pm
by NotoriousREV
Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:43 pm
Carlos wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:40 am
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 am

Because it was designed in the 70s
A 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?

Those GTV go really well and are a right handful drive. The oddest driving position i have ever come across, i couldnt get remotely comfortable.

ETA- The advert is wrong as they were 230bhp.
was the 3.2 around 230bhp? Equally pathetic for something supposed to be a special version.
The 24v 3.0 was 220ps (vs 230 for the BMW 3.0 of that era) and the 3.2 was 240ps. 75ps/litre is just normal, really. It was hardly an M3 competitor (nor was it M3 money).

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:14 pm
by integrale_evo
A mid 80s 2.5 version of a 70s BMW straight 6 made 170bhp odd, a 2001 BMW 2.2 straight 6 made 170bhp ish.

My mid 90s 3.2 straight 6 BMW made 316bhp...

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:16 pm
by integrale_evo
156gta wasn't far off m3 money was it?

I love how they look and probably would have bought one years ago if they had another 70bhp and were rwd.

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:55 pm
by NotoriousREV
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:14 pm My mid 90s 3.2 straight 6 BMW made 316bhp...
So you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 2:04 pm
by Rich B
NotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:55 pm
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:14 pm My mid 90s 3.2 straight 6 BMW made 316bhp...
So you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.
nah, just they they’re a “bit shit.”

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 2:46 pm
by NotoriousREV
Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 2:04 pm
NotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:55 pm
integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:14 pm My mid 90s 3.2 straight 6 BMW made 316bhp...
So you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.
nah, just they they’re a “bit shit.”
I think you’ll find they’re “pathetic”.

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 3:00 pm
by NotoriousREV
Anyway, the Firebird I want makes 34bhp/litre. Beat that for pathetic output :lol:

Re: Today’s want

Posted: Tue Mar 24, 2020 3:45 pm
by Mito Man
I have farts more powerful.