Re: Today’s want
Posted: Sat Feb 29, 2020 5:46 pm
I remember MarkBT_52 taking me round Donington in his Exige, bonkers. Only thing I've passengered in that was quicker was a 340R!
Well, the DTM is supercharged, so 200+bhp more, and can do 200mph and 60 in < 4s. So there is that.
pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?Coaster1 wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:31 am
https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds ... p/10460033
Tasty
He probably only communicates over CB radioNotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 10:50 am I’m trying to buy this but the seller isn’t responding.
F00E4DA7-F4AC-4B02-9D89-AE7D1E2AD0CF.jpeg
Because it was designed in the 70sRich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 ampretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?Coaster1 wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:31 am
https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds ... p/10460033
Tasty
A 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 amBecause it was designed in the 70sRich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 ampretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?Coaster1 wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:31 am
https://www.pistonheads.com/classifieds ... p/10460033
Tasty
was the 3.2 around 230bhp? Equally pathetic for something supposed to be a special version.Carlos wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:40 amA 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?integrale_evo wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:24 amBecause it was designed in the 70sRich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 6:52 am pretty, but how does it make so little power out of so many litres?
Those GTV go really well and are a right handful drive. The oddest driving position i have ever come across, i couldnt get remotely comfortable.
ETA- The advert is wrong as they were 230bhp.
The 24v 3.0 was 220ps (vs 230 for the BMW 3.0 of that era) and the 3.2 was 240ps. 75ps/litre is just normal, really. It was hardly an M3 competitor (nor was it M3 money).Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 12:43 pmwas the 3.2 around 230bhp? Equally pathetic for something supposed to be a special version.Carlos wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 11:40 amA 90s early 2000s Bmw 3l engine would have been 200-230bhp though ?
Those GTV go really well and are a right handful drive. The oddest driving position i have ever come across, i couldnt get remotely comfortable.
ETA- The advert is wrong as they were 230bhp.
So you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.
nah, just they they’re a “bit shit.”NotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:55 pmSo you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.
I think you’ll find they’re “pathetic”.Rich B wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 2:04 pmnah, just they they’re a “bit shit.”NotoriousREV wrote: Tue Mar 24, 2020 1:55 pmSo you’re saying that engines that didn’t set the contemporary record for highest specific output for a production engine had a lower specific output than engines that did? I, for one, am shocked at this news. Shocked.